Cited by 100Probiotics and Fermented FoodsIdentification and Quantification in FoodGut microbiota and health

Genotyping by PCR and high-throughput sequencing of commercial probiotic products reveals composition biases

Open access
Morovic, Wesley, Hibberd, Ashley A., Zabel, Bryan, Barrangou, Rodolphe, Stahl, Buffy·2016·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Recent advances in microbiome research have brought renewed focus on beneficial bacteria, many of which are available in food and dietary supplements. Although probiotics have historically been defined as microorganisms that convey health benefits when ingested in sufficient viable amounts, this description now includes the stipulation “well defined strains,” encompassing definitive taxonomy for consumer consideration and regulatory oversight. Here, we evaluated 52 commercial dietary supplements covering a range of labeled species, and determined their content using plate counting, targeted genotyping. Additionally, strain identities were assessed using methods recently published by the United States Pharmacopeial Convention. We also determined the relative abundance of individual bacteria by high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of the 16S rRNA sequence using paired-end 2x250bp Illumina MiSeq technology. Using multiple methods, we tested the hypothesis that products do contain the quantitative amount of labeled bacteria, and qualitative list of labeled microbial species. We found that 17 samples (33%) were below label claim for CFU prior to their expiration dates. A multiplexed-PCR scheme showed that only 30/52 (58%) of the products contained a correctly labeled classification, with issues encompassing incorrect taxonomy, missing species and un-labeled species. The HTS revealed that many blended products consisted predominantly of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis. These results highlight the need for reliable methods to qualitatively determine the correct taxonomy and quantitatively ascertain the relative amounts of mixed microbial populations in commercial probiotic products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01747

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global assessments report label-claim discrepancies in over 40% of commercial probiotics.

    “These findings align with global assessments, which report label-claim discrepancies in over 40% of commercial probiotics.24,25”

    From Safety and efficacy concerns in Indian probiotics: Insights from whole-genome sequencing and <i>in vitro</i> assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results section reports labeling discrepancies in 22 of 52 tested products (42.3%), supporting the ‘over 40%’ figure. But the Materials and methods section says the products were purchased from retailers in Madison, Wisconsin; this study does not establish a global rate of discrepancies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Aronesty, 2011, Ea-Utils: Command-Line Tools for Processing Biological Sequencing Data
  2. Branton, 2011, In vitro characterization and safety of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus reuteri cardioviva NCIMB 30242, Int. J. Probiotics Prebiotics, 6, 1
  3. FAO-WHO, 2001, Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with live Lactic Acid Bacteria.
  4. Hammett, 2008, Therapeutic Goods Order No. 78: Standard for Tablets and Capsules. Australian Government Therapeutic Goods Administration, F2008L04287
  5. Health Canada, 2015, Natural Health Product: Probiotics. Health Canada
  6. 2014, Lactic Acid Bacteria: Biodiversity and Taxonomy.
  7. International Organization for Standardization, 2003, ISO 7889:2003 (IDF 117:2003). Yogurt — Enumeration of Characteristic Microorganisms — Colony-Count Technique at 37 Degrees C. International Organization for Standardization
  8. International Organization for Standardization, 2015, ISO 19344:2015 (IDF 232): Milk and Milk Products – Starter Cultures, Probiotics and Fermented Products – Quantification of Lactic Acid Bacteria by Flow Cytometry. International Organization for Standardization
  9. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2015, Food Chemicals Codex

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morovic, W., Hibberd, A. A., Zabel, B., Barrangou, R., & Stahl, B.
Affiliations
  • DuPont (United States) (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Stahl, Buffy
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2016-11-03
Volume
7
Pages
1747-1747
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2548672526
Cited by
99
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
DuPont
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, dietary supplements, commercial probiotic products, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, colony-forming units, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, microbial community composition, microbiome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review