Cited by 194Probiotics and Fermented FoodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Improving End-User Trust in the Quality of Commercial Probiotic Products

Open access
Jackson, Scott A., Schoeni, Jean L., Vegge, Christina, Pane, Marco, Stahl, Buffy, Bradley, Michael, Goldman, Virginia S., Burguière, Pierre +2 more·2019·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

In a rapidly growing global probiotic market, end-users have difficulty distinguishing between high quality and poor quality products. This ambiguity threatens the trust consumers and healthcare providers have in probiotic products. To address this problem, we recommend that companies undergo third-party evaluations to certify probiotic quality and label accuracy. In order to communicate about product quality to end-users, indication of certification on product labels is helpful, although not all manufacturers choose to use this approach. Herein we discuss: third-party certification, the process of setting standards for identity, purity, and quantification of probiotics; some emerging methodologies useful for quality assessment; and some technical challenges unique to managing quality of live microbial products. This review provides insights of an Expert Panel engaged in this process and aims to update the reader on relevant current scientific methodologies. Establishing validated methodologies for all aspects of quality assessment is an essential component of this process and can be facilitated by established organizations, such as United States Pharmacopeia. Emerging methodologies including whole genome sequencing and flow cytometry are poised to play important roles in these processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00739

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Staley J. T. Krieg N. R. (1984). “Classification of prokaryote organisms: an overview,” in Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol. 1 eds Krieg N. R. Holt J. G. (Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins) 1– 4.
  2. United States Food and Drug Administration (2007). 21 CFR Part 111: Current Good Manufacturing Practices in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements. Available at: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=435f52505034431827df2ab91d540930&mc=true&node=pt21.2.111&rgn=div5#_tap (accessed April 1 2019). 17674484

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, S. A., Schoeni, J. L., Vegge, C., Pane, M., Stahl, B., Bradley, M., Goldman, V. S., Burguière, P., Atwater, J. B., & Sanders, M. E.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Eurofins (United States) (US)
  • Chr. Hansen (Denmark) (DK)
  • DuPont (United States) (US)
  • United States Pharmacopeial Convention (US)
Corresponding author
Sanders, Mary Ellen
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2019-04-17
Volume
10
Pages
739-739
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936341475
Cited by
192
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
probiotics, third-party certification, consumer trust, product labeling, United States Pharmacopoeia, whole genome sequencing, flow cytometry, quality standards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review