Cited by 129Probiotics and Fermented FoodsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesHealthcare Regulation

Probiotic use in at-risk populations

Open access
Sanders, Mary Ellen, Merenstein, Daniel J., Ouwehand, Arthur C., Reid, Gregor, Salminen, Seppo, Cabana, Michael D., Paraskevakos, George, Leyer, Gregory·2016·Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To inform health care providers about quality standards for manufacture of probiotic products being recommended for at-risk patient populations. SUMMARY: Probiotics are used in a variety of clinical settings, sometimes in at-risk populations for therapeutic endpoints. Although probiotics might not be approved as drugs, they are sometimes used for the prevention or treatment of disease. In the United States, and many regions of the world, probiotic products are marketed as dietary supplements (not drugs) and are therefore subject to different manufacturing and quality control standards than approved drugs are. Health care providers need to be assured that probiotic products used in at-risk populations are safe for this use. Pharmacists should require certificates of analysis, which document quality standards, from manufacturers of products stocked in hospital formularies or other pharmacies dispensing to at-risk people. Although responsible manufacturers use stringent quality standards on their processes and finished products, using a third party to verify compliance with manufacturing and accuracy of product labeling adds assurance to end users that the product is of high quality. CONCLUSION: It is in patients' best interest to use probiotics in the prevention and treatment of conditions when the evidence is convincing. To protect high-risk patients, probiotic products should meet stringent microbiological standards. Product testing results should be available for review before recommending probiotic products to at-risk individuals. For products used in at-risk populations, manufacturers should provide this information or participate in a third-party verification program that certifies compliance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.japh.2016.07.001

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are two aspects to safety: establishing the adverse effect profile of specific single-strain and multi-strain supplements, and ensuring marketed supplements meet stringent quality standards to ensure correct strains are present and product is free of contamination.

    “There are two aspects to safety: establishing the adverse effect profile of specific single-strain and multi-strain supplements (i.e., the safety of the strain(s) per se), and ensuring that marketed supplements meet stringent quality standards to ensure the correct strains are present and the product is free of contamination [217].”
  • Probiotics have been studied in vulnerable groups including infants, patients with severe acute pancreatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, liver diseases, HIV, and other conditions, with greater cause for concern for products containing high concentrations up to 450-900 billion live bacteria per dose.

    “Further, probiotics have been studied in vulnerable groups, including infants, patients with severe acute pancreatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, liver diseases, HIV, and other conditions [213, 216–218] with even greater cause for concern with the small number of products that contain high concentrations of up to 450–900 billion live bacteria per dose [211].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, et al. Expert consensus document. The Inter- national Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506e514.
  2. Gregory Leyer, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer, UAS Laboratories, Madison, WI M.E. Sanders et al. / Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 56 (2016) 680e686

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanders, M. E., Merenstein, D. J., Ouwehand, A. C., Reid, G., Salminen, S., Cabana, M. D., Paraskevakos, G., & Leyer, G.
Corresponding author
Sanders, Mary Ellen
Venue
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
680-686
ISSN
1544-3191 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549916053
Cited by
129
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
15.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Pharmacists Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Pharmacopeia
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
Keywords
probiotics, vulnerable populations, probiotic quality control, production standards, dietary supplements, microbiological standards, third-party verification, product labeling, hospital formulary, pharmacist recommendations, probiotic safety
MeSH terms
Food Labeling, Humans, Pharmacists, Quality Control, Risk Factors, United States, Dietary Supplements, Food Industry, Probiotics, Professional Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review