Cited by 117Probiotics and Fermented FoodsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGut microbiota and health

Probiotic potential and safety evaluation of Enterococcus faecalis OB14 and OB15, isolated from traditional tunisian testouri cheese and rigouta, using physiological and genomic analysis

Open access
Baccouri, Olfa, Boukerb, Amine Mohamed, Farhat, Leila Ben, Zébré, Arthur, Zimmermann, Kurt, Domann, Eugen, Cambronel, Mélyssa, Barreau, Magalie +7 more·2019·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains OB14 and OB15 were isolated from traditional Tunisian fermented dairy products, Testouri cheese and Rigouta, respectively. They were identified as Enterococcus faecalis by the MALDI TOF-MS (matrix assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight mass spectrometry) biotyper system and molecular assays (species-specific PCR). These new isolates were evaluated for probiotic properties, compared to E. faecalis Symbioflor 1 clone DSM 16431, as probiotic reference. The bacteria were found to be tolerant to the harsh conditions of the gastrointestinal tract (acidity and bile salt). They were low to moderate biofilm producers, can adhere to Caco-2/TC7 intestinal cells and strengthen the intestinal barrier through the increase of the transepithelial electrical resistance (TER). Susceptibility to ampicillin, vancomycin, gentamicin and erythromycin has been tested using the broth microdilutions method. The results demonstrated that E. faecalis OB14 and OB15 were sensitive to the clinically important ampicillin (MIC=1µg/mL) and vancomycin (MIC= 2µg/mL) antibiotics. However, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) showed the presence of tetracycline resistance and cytolysin genes in E. faecalis OB14, and this led to high mortality of Galleria Mellonella larvae in the virulence test. Hierarchical cluster analysis by MALDI TOF-MS biotyper showed that E. faecalis OB15 was closely related to the E. faecalis Symbioflor 1 probiotic strain than to OB14, and this has been confirmed by WGS using the Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and Genome-to-Genome Hybridization similarity (GGDH) methods. According to these results, E. faecalis OB15 seems to be reliable for future development as probiotic, in food or feed industry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00881

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The criteria for selecting probiotic LAB strains are safety, including absence of secretion of harmful metabolites, survival in gastrointestinal conditions, and ability to inhibit pathogens.

    “The criteria for selecting probiotic LAB strains are safety, including the absence of the secretion of harmful metabolites, survival in gastrointestinal conditions, and the ability to inhibit pathogens [10,11].”

    From Probiotic and Antifungal Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates from Naturally Fermented Brazilian Table Olives (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    In Results and Discussion (page not available), the paper identifies survival under stomach and intestinal conditions as a prerequisite for probiotics; its safety evaluation also calls for assessing hemolysis and cytotoxicity. The Introduction describes inhibition of pathogens by bacteriocins as a proposed probiotic selection trait. The available passages do not identify absence of secretion of harmful metabolites as a selection criterion. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baccouri, O., Boukerb, A. M., Farhat, L. B., Zébré, A., Zimmermann, K., Domann, E., Cambronel, M., Barreau, M., Maillot, O., Rincé, I., Muller, C., Marzouki, M. N., Feuilloley, M., Abidi, F., & Connil, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Carthage (TN)
  • Normandie Université (FR)
  • SymbioPharm (Germany) (DE)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
Connil, Nathalie
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2019-04-24
Volume
10
Pages
881-881
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2942463136
Cited by
117
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
FWCI
12.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Région Normandie
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
Enterococcus faecalis, probiotic potential, probiotic safety, fermented dairy products, gastrointestinal tolerance, bile salt tolerance, biofilm formation, intestinal barrier, antibiotic susceptibility, tetracycline resistance, Galleria mellonella virulence, whole genome sequencing, average nucleotide identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review