Cited by 85Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Is dorsal anterior cingulate cortex activation in response to social exclusion due to expectancy violation? An fMRI study

Open access
Kawamoto, Taishi, Onoda, Keiichi, Nakashima, Ken'ichiro, Nittono, Hiroshi, Yamaguchi, Shuhei, Ura, Mitsuhiro·2012·Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience

Abstract

People are typically quite sensitive about being accepted or excluded by others. Previous studies have suggested that the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) is a key brain region involved in the detection of social exclusion. However, this region has also been shown to be sensitive to non-social expectancy violations. We often expect other people to follow an unwritten rule in which they include us as they would expect to be included, such that social exclusion likely involves some degree of expectancy violation. The present event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study sought to separate the effects of expectancy violation from those of social exclusion, such that we employed an "overinclusion" condition in which a player was unexpectedly overincluded in the game by the other players. With this modification, we found that the dACC and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (rVLPFC) were activated by exclusion, relative to overinclusion. In addition, we identified a negative correlation between exclusion-evoked brain activity and self-rated social pain in the rVLPFC, but not in the dACC. These findings suggest that the rVLPFC is critical for regulating social pain, whereas the dACC plays an important role in the detection of exclusion. The neurobiological basis of social exclusion is different from that of mere expectancy violation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00011

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing studies that compare social exclusion with over-inclusion and/or acceptance do not paint a consistent picture of dACC and AI involvement.

    “Existing studies that compare social exclusion with over-inclusion and/or acceptance do not paint a consistent picture of dACC and AI involvement.”
  • Over-inclusion may be a more appropriate comparison than fair play for determining the specificity of neural responses to the affective distress of exclusion, because its psychological experience may be better matched in the degree to which participants' expectations are violated.

    “Over-inclusion may be a more appropriate comparison for determining the specificity of neural responses to the affective distress of exclusion, because its psychological experience may be better matched in the degree to which participant’s expectations are violated (Kawamoto et al., 2012).”
  • In a Cyberball study with young adults, the dACC exhibited greater responses to exclusion than over-inclusion, but the AI did not.

    “One such study with Cyberball in young adults found that the dACC exhibited greater responses to exclusion than over-inclusion, but that the AI did not (Kawamoto et al., 2012).”
  • Greater ACC activity is related to greater self-reported distress from exclusion during Cyberball, while greater ventrolateral PFC activation is related to less distress.

    “Masten and colleagues (2009) found that greater ACC activity was related to greater self-reported distress from exclusion during Cyberball, while greater ventrolateral PFC activation was related to less distress; this latter association (but not the former) was also supported by Kawamoto et al. (2012) and Bolling et al. (2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pickett C. L. Gardner W. L. (2005). The social monitoring system: enhanced sensitivity to social cues as an adaptive response to social exclusion, in The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying, eds Williams K. D. Forgas J. von Hippel W. (New York, NY: Psychological Press), 213– 226

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawamoto, T., Onoda, K., Nakashima, K., Nittono, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Ura, M.
Affiliations
  • Hiroshima University (JP)
  • Shimane University (JP)
  • Nagasaki Women's Junior College (JP)
Corresponding author
Kawamoto, Taishi
Venue
Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
4
Pages
11-11
ISSN
1663-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000222230
Cited by
85
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19203030, 12J05780, 22830128, 24500483)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
social exclusion, expectancy violation, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, overinclusion, social pain, social acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review