Cited by 18Mind wandering and attentionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The influence of valence and decision difficulty on self-referential processing

Open access
Meffert, Harma, Blanken, Laura, Blair, Karina S., White, Stuart F., Blair, James R.·2013·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Self-referential processing is defined as the process by which a person becomes aware that specific contents are related to his or her own self. Cortical midline structures (CMS), such as dorsal and medial prefrontal cortex, and regions such as inferior frontal cortex, insula, and temporal pole have been implicated in self-referential processing. However, the specific contribution of each of these areas is still largely unknown. More particularly, not many studies have examined the influence of valence and decision making difficulty on regions involved in self-referential processing. In this study, participants evaluated how well personality traits, differing in valence and decision difficulty, described themselves or the current US President. In line with predictions, ventral, rostral, and dorsal parts of medial prefrontal cortex showed greater activity when participants judged traits about themselves relative to judging traits about the current US President. However, none of these regions showed significant modulation by trait valence. Increasing trait decision difficulty was associated with increased activity within dorsal medial prefrontal cortex and bilateral anterior insula. However, there was very minimal overlap (6/119 voxels, i.e., 5%) of the regions of dorsal medial prefrontal cortex implicated in self-referential processing and those implicated in trait decision difficulty. The results are interpreted within current accounts of self-referential processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00046

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Talairach J. Tournoux P. (1988). Co-Planar Stereotaxix Atlas of the Human Brain. Stuttgart: Thieme
  2. Anderson N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 9, 272– 979 5666976

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meffert, H., Blanken, L., Blair, K. S., White, S. F., & Blair, J. R.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital (NL)
Corresponding author
Meffert, Harma
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
46-46
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097772879
Cited by
18
References
59
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1‑ZIA‑MH002860‑08, ZIAMH002860)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
self-referential processing, decision difficulty, medial prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, self-other judgment, personality traits, self-awareness, cortical midline structures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review