The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 4 are not checked yet.
The Cognitive Atlas: Toward a Knowledge Foundation for Cognitive Neuroscience
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive neuroscience aims to map mental processes onto brain function, which begs the question of what "mental processes" exist and how they relate to the tasks that are used to manipulate and measure them. This topic has been addressed informally in prior work, but we propose that cumulative progress in cognitive neuroscience requires a more systematic approach to representing the mental entities that are being mapped to brain function and the tasks used to manipulate and measure mental processes. We describe a new open collaborative project that aims to provide a knowledge base for cognitive neuroscience, called the Cognitive Atlas (accessible online at http://www.cognitiveatlas.org), and outline how this project has the potential to drive novel discoveries about both mind and brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The N-back task is often used as a measure of cognitive control, which itself is a complex construct composed of dissociable sub-components, such as updating, set-shifting and response inhibition (Miyake et al., 2000), that likely rely on overlapping, yet distinct, neural architectures (Duncan, 2010; Poldrack et al., 2011).”
From The Dynamics of Functional Brain Networks: Integrated Network States during Cognitive Task Performance (2016) · cites this paper as Poldrack et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
A translation approach to portable ontology specifications
Gruber, T. (1993) · Knowledge Acquisition · doi:10.1006/knac.1993.1008 · Cited by 13,568
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
Berners‐Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34 · Cited by 9,605
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 · Cited by 7,067
Baddeley, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1736359 · Cited by 5,258
Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data.
Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1635 · Cited by 3,686
Self-citationAn Integrated Theory of the Mind.
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C. J., & Qin, Y. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1036 · Cited by 3,153
The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Sternberg, S. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 · Cited by 3,137
Cellular basis of working memory
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90304-6 · Cited by 2,663
SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence
Laird, J. E., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(87)90050-6 · Cited by 2,535
Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?
POLDRACK, R. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004 · Cited by 2,249
Self-citationCohen, J. D., Dunbar, K. N., & McClelland, J. L. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.332 · Cited by 2,192
Hippocampus, space, and memory
Olton, D. S., Becker, J. T., & Handelmann, G. E. (1979) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00062713 · Cited by 2,018
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Giles, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/438900a · Cited by 1,978
A History of Experimental Psychology
Ruckmick, C. A., & Boring, E. G. (1930) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1414897 · Cited by 1,814
Relations in biomedical ontologies
Smith, B., Ceusters, W. M., Klagges, B. R. E., Köhler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A. L., & Rosse, C. (2005) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r46 · Cited by 1,030
Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity
Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Miura, T. K., & Colflesh, G. J. H. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615 · Cited by 933 · cited 1×
“Similarly, while the N -back task is often referred to as the “N -back working memory task,” serious questions have been raised regarding whether it truly measures the construct of “working memory” (Kane et al., 2007).”
BackgroundHarnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia
Kittur, A., & Kraut, R. E. (2008) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/1460563.1460572 · Cited by 700
Self-citationThe Remembered Present; A Biological Theory of Consciousness.
Berger, G., & Edelman, G. M. (1994) · Noûs · doi:10.2307/2216056 · Cited by 692
SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference
Miles, A., & Bechhofer, S. (2009) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 681
Textpresso: An Ontology-Based Information Retrieval and Extraction System for Biological Literature
Müller, H.-M., Kenny, E. E., & Sternberg, P. W. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020309 · Cited by 653
Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B. A., & Ed, H. (2007) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240698 · Cited by 575
Self-citationA history of experimental psychology, 2nd ed.
Boring, E. G. (1950) · Cited by 488
Laird, A., Lancaster, J., & Fox, P. (2007) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1385/ni:3:1:065 · Cited by 379
Ontologies in biology: design, applications and future challenges
Bard, J., & Rhee, S. Y. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1295 · Cited by 352
The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness
Verschure, P. F. M. J., & Edelman, G. M. (1992) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423200 · Cited by 327
Decentralization in wikipedia governance.
Forte, A., Larco, V., & Bruckman, A. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260103 · Cited by 300
Functional ontologies for cognition: The systematic definition of structure and function
Price, C. J., & Friston, K. J. (2004) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290442000095 · Cited by 285
Decoding the Large-Scale Structure of Brain Function by Classifying Mental States Across Individuals
Poldrack, R. A., Halchenko, Y. O., & Hanson, S. J. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02460.x · Cited by 237
Self-citationThe Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness
Stafford, C. (1990) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450130130045 · Cited by 236
Soar: An Architecture for General Intelligence
Laird, J. E., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada205407 · Cited by 219
DSM categories and dimensions in clinical and research contexts
KRAEMER, H. C. (2007) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.211 · Cited by 195
Towards an Ontology of Cognitive Control
Lenartowicz, A., Kalar, D. J., Congdon, E. L., & Poldrack, R. A. (2010) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01100.x · Cited by 184
Self-citationCategory learning and the memory systems debate
Poldrack, R. A., & Foerde, K. (2007) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.07.007 · Cited by 169
Self-citationCiTO, the Citation Typing Ontology
Shotton, D. M. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Semantics · doi:10.1186/2041-1480-1-s1-s6 · Cited by 161
The Cognitive Paradigm Ontology: Design and Application
Turner, J. A., & Laird, A. R. (2011) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-011-9126-x · Cited by 156
e-Neuroscience: challenges and triumphs in integrating distributed data from molecules to brains
Martone, M. E., Gupta, A., & Ellisman, M. H. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1229 · Cited by 124
Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J., Botstein, D., Davis, A. P., Eppig, J. T., Harris, M. A., Hill, D. P., Richardson, J., Ringwald, M., et al. (2000) · The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) · Cited by 114
Cognitive ontologies for neuropsychiatric phenomics research
Bilder, R. M., Sabb, F. W., Parker, D. S., Kalar, D. J., Chu, W. W., Fox, J., Freimer, N. B., & Poldrack, R. A. (2009) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546800902787180 · Cited by 110
Self-citationHarnessing the Wisdom of Crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through Coordination
Kittur, A., & Kraut, R. E. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6470099 · Cited by 81
Self-citationA collaborative knowledge base for cognitive phenomics
Sabb, F. W., Bearden, C. E., Glahn, D. C., Parker, D. S., Freimer, N. B., & Bilder, R. M. (2008) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4002124 · Cited by 76
Self-citationDonohoe, G. J., Corvin, A. P., & Robertson, I. H. (2006) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546800444000155 · Cited by 69
Bowden, D. M., & Dubach, M. F. (2003) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1385/ni:1:1:043 · Cited by 59
GS2: an efficiently computable measure of GO-based similarity of gene sets
Ruths, T., Ruths, D. A., & Nakhleh, L. K. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp128 · Cited by 49
Smith, A. A., Greenbaum, D. S., Douglas, S. M., Long, M., & Gerstein, M. (2005) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-9-119 · Cited by 25
Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards
Giles, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/438136b · Cited by 17
Miller, E., Seppa, C., Kittur, A., Sabb, F. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2010) · Nature Precedings · doi:10.1038/npre.2010.4532.1 · Cited by 10
Self-citationMiller, E., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Kittur, A., Sabb, F. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2010) · Nature Precedings · doi:10.1038/npre.2010.4532 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn
Abraham, A., Pedregosa, F., Eickenberg, M., Gervais, P., Mueller, A., Kossaifi, J., Gramfort, A., Thirion, B., & Varoquaux, G. P. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2014.00014 · Cited by 2,556
Gorgolewski, K. J., Auer, T., Calhoun, V. D., Craddock, R. C., Das, S., Duff, E. P., Flandin, G., Ghosh, S. S., Glatard, T., Halchenko, Y. O., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.44 · Cited by 1,775
Self-citationShine, J. M., Bissett, P. G., Bell, P. T., Koyejo, O., Balsters, J. H., Gorgolewski, K. J., Moodie, C. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.018 · Cited by 886
Self-citationInferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding
Poldrack, R. A. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.001 · Cited by 821
Self-citationHansen, J. Y., Shafiei, G., Markello, R. D., Smart, K., Cox, S. M. L., Nørgaard, M., Beliveau, V., Wu, Y., Gallezot, J.-D., Aumont, É., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01186-3 · Cited by 797
Metadata
- Authors
- Poldrack, R. A., Kittur, A., Kalar, D., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Gil, Y., Parker, D. S., Sabb, F. W., & Bilder, R. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Poldrack, Russell A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1662-5196 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3167196
- OpenAlex
- W1974687978
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (PL1MH083271, R01MH082795)
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (UL1DE019580)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (RL1LM009833)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- knowledge base, cognitive neuroscience, cognitive processes, functional brain mapping, cognitive tasks, knowledge representation, neuroinformatics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
