The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.
The Eyes Test as a Measure of Individual Differences: How much of the Variance Reflects Verbal IQ?
Open accessAbstract
Developed by Baron-Cohen et al. (1997, 2001), the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test requires individuals to determine mental states from photos of pairs of eyes. Used in over 250 studies, it has been conceptualized as an advanced theory of mind test that is relatively free of general cognitive abilities. Given the sensitivity of the instrument, many studies with healthy adult samples have used this instrument as a measure of individual differences in social-perceptual processes that contribute to theory of mind and overall phenotype. We administered the two-subtest Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, a face-processing task (Cambridge Face Memory Test), and the Eyes Test to 42 college students. Surprisingly, verbal IQ contributed significantly to the variance in Eyes Test performance while the face perception measure did not. These findings have both practical and theoretical ramifications for interpreting Eyes Test results in normative adult samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“That this is the second study to identify such a strong relation between the Eyes Test and Vocabulary suggests that performance on the former may be heavily based on one's vocabulary knowledge.”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Peterson and Miller, 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In general, verbal abilities are associated with performance on the Eyes Test (Golan et al., 2006; Ahmed and Miller, 2011; Peterson and Miller, 2012; cf. Ferguson and Austin, 2010 who found no relation).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Peterson and Miller, 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“At the latent level, however, we found a strong correlation (0.49 in Study 1 and 0.62 in Study 2) between the ACO Model with Vocabulary, which is similar in magnitude to the manifest correlation with Vocabulary found by Peterson and Miller (2012).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Peterson and Miller, 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Previous research suggests that at the manifest level, the Eyes Test is weakly related to verbal fluency (Ahmed and Miller, 2011) and moderately related to verbal IQ (Golan et al., 2006; Peterson and Miller, 2012).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Peterson and Miller, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Veizel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2519 · Cited by 5,546
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715 · Cited by 4,555
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 4,313
Happé, F. G. E. (1994) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02172093 · Cited by 2,352
Baron‐Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01599.x · Cited by 1,970
Autistic Traits in the General Population: A Twin Study
Constantino, J. N., & Todd, R. D. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.524 · Cited by 1,317 · cited 3×
“Given both the notion of a broader autism phenotype (Baron-Cohen and Hammer, 1997) and the understanding that autism symptomatology is normally distributed in the general population (Constantino and Todd, 2003), we were motivated to explore the degree to which any influence of verbal IQ might overlap with either phono…”
BackgroundComprehensive Test of Phonological Processing
Mitchell, J.-J. (2001) · Assessment for Effective Intervention · doi:10.1177/073724770102600305 · Cited by 1,307
Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states
Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0016923 · Cited by 1,261
Baron-Cohen, S., O'Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1023035012436 · Cited by 1,211
Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2005) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,040
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002 · Cited by 614
Genetic Heterogeneity Between the Three Components of the Autism Spectrum: A Twin Study
RONALD, A., HAPPÉ, F., BOLTON, P., BUTCHER, L. M., PRICE, T. S., WHEELWRIGHT, S., BARON-COHEN, S., & PLOMIN, R. (2006) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000215325.13058.9d · Cited by 508
Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Viezel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese0544 · Cited by 493
Cross-cultural Reading the Mind in the Eyes: An fMRI Investigation
Adams, R. B., Rule, N. O., Franklin, R. G., Wang, E. J., Stevenson, M. T., Yoshikawa, S., Nomura, M., Sato, W., Kveraga, K., & Ambady, N. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21187 · Cited by 452
Implicit and Explicit Processes in Social Cognition
Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.032 · Cited by 448
Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability
Russell, R., Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.252 · Cited by 429
Parents of Children with Asperger Syndrome: What is the Cognitive Phenotype?
Baron‐Cohen, S., & Hammer, J. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.4.548 · Cited by 375
Understanding orbitofrontal contributions to theory-of-mind reasoning: Implications for autism
Sabbagh, M. A. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2003.04.002 · Cited by 337
Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing
Reynolds, C. R. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced0478 · Cited by 268
Phenotypic and Genetic Overlap Between Autistic Traits at the Extremes of the General Population
Ronald, A., Happe, F. G. E., Price, T. S., Baron‐Cohen, S., & Plomin, R. J. (2006) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000230165.54117.41 · Cited by 229
Test of Language Competence--Expanded Edition
Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1989) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15159-000 · Cited by 224
Deficits in Social Cognition and Response Flexibility in Pediatric Bipolar Disorder
McClure, E. B., Treland, J. E., Snow, J., Schmajuk, M., Dickstein, D. P., Towbin, K. E., Charney, D. S., Pine, D. S., & Leibenluft, E. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1644 · Cited by 214
Social‐cognition and the broad autism phenotype: identifying genetically meaningful phenotypes
Losh, M. C., & Piven, J. (2006) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01594.x · Cited by 209
Billington, J., Baron‐Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. J. (2007) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.004 · Cited by 172
Social Value Orientation: Related to Empathy and the Ability to Read the Mind in the Eyes
Declerck, C. H., & Bogaert, S. (2008) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.148.6.711-726 · Cited by 147
Ferguson, F. J., & Austin, E. J. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.009 · Cited by 134
Baron‐Cohen, S., Stone, V. E., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. C. (1999) · Cited by 127
Carroll, J. M., & Chiew, K. Y. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0127-9 · Cited by 92
The reading the mind in the eyes test: test-retest reliability of a Swedish version
Hallerbäck, M. U., Lugnegård, T., Hjärthag, F., & Gillberg, C. (2009) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546800902901518 · Cited by 90
Gavilán, J. M., & García‐Albea, J. E. (2010) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.07.006 · Cited by 63
A critical review of the eyes test as a measure of social-cognitive impairment
Johnston, L. C., Miles, L. K., & McKinlay, A. (2008) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530701449521 · Cited by 62
Schmidt, G. L., Kimel, L. K., Winterrowd, E. M., Pennington, B. F., Hepburn, S., & Rojas, D. C. (2008) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390701551225 · Cited by 47
The role of Theory of Mind in assessing cooperative intentions
Sylwester, K., Lyons, M. T., Buchanan, C., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.005 · Cited by 37
Lee, S. A., Guajardo, N. R., Short, S. D., & King, W. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.016 · Cited by 23
In search of “master mindreaders”: Are psychics superior in reading the language of the eyes?
Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Hassenstab, J. J., Gold, S. M., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. J. (2005) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.12.002 · Cited by 22
What makes a face memorable? The relationship between face memory and emotional state reasoning
Franklin, R. G., & Adams, R. B. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.031 · Cited by 15
Baron‐Cohen, S. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1017/s0021963001266979 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kaufmann A. S. (1994). Intelligence Testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Initial Psychometric Study
Pinkham, A. E., Penn, D. L., Green, M. F., & Harvey, P. D. (2015) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv056 · Cited by 327
Empirical failures of the claim that autistic people lack a theory of mind.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Yergeau, M. (2019) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000067 · Cited by 295
Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Final Validation Study
Pinkham, A. E., Harvey, P. D., & Penn, D. L. (2017) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx117 · Cited by 291
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000064 · Cited by 289
Baron-Cohen, S., Bowen, D. C., Holt, R. J., Allison, C., Auyeung, B., Lombardo, M. V., Smith, P., & Lai, M.-C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136521 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterson, E., & Miller, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Northern Colorado (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peterson, Eric
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 220-220
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3389807
- OpenAlex
- W2150119965
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, theory of mind, verbal IQ, individual differences, face perception, Cambridge Face Memory Test, WASI, social cognition, general intelligence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
