Cited by 231Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Management and Treatment

Anticipatory brainstem activity predicts neural processing of pain in humans

Fairhurst, Merle, Wiech, Katja, Dunckley, Paul, Tracey, Irene·2007·Pain

Abstract

Previous neuroimaging studies have shown brain activity during not only the application of noxious stimuli, but also prior to stimulation. The functional significance of the anticipatory response, however, has yet to be explored. Two theoretical responses involve either a decrease or an increase in sensitivity of the nociceptive system. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, brainstem responses during anticipation and processing of thermal noxious stimuli were investigated. Twelve healthy subjects were warned prior to and then received noxious stimulation to their left hand. Behavioral data showed a positive correlation between the intensity of anticipation and pain. FMRI data revealed brainstem activation in the PAG during the anticipation period. When correlated with individual anticipation ratings, activation during anticipation included significant clusters within the entorhinal cortex and ventral tegmental area (VTA). During receipt, activation within the brainstem included the PAG, VTA, rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), and the parabrachial nucleus (PB), all elements of descending pain pathways. Using a backward model approach, we explored the functional significance of the anticipatory neural response for subsequent pain processing. Results of this regression analysis revealed that insula activity during receipt was predicted by activity in both the entorhinal cortex and VTA during anticipation. We suggest that activation in both regions before and during pain may underlie anticipation and subsequent pain modulatory responses, possibly involving the appraisal and control of attention necessary for pain modulation. Together, the results suggest a possible role of brainstem areas in anticipatory mechanisms involved in the maintenance of chronic pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.001

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activity in the PAG and OFC has often been related to processing of anxiety associated with anticipating nociceptive stimuli.

    “The activity in the PAG and the OFC has also been often related to the processing of anxiety associated with anticipating nociceptive stimuli (Brodersen et al., 2012; Fairhurst et al., 2007).”

    From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as Fairhurst et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fairhurst, M., Wiech, K., Dunckley, P., & Tracey, I.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Tracey, Irene
Venue
Pain
Published
2007-03
Volume
128
Issue
1
Pages
101-110
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044479451
Cited by
231
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-41622)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain anticipation, brainstem, pain processing, periaqueductal gray, ventral tegmental area, entorhinal cortex, rostral ventromedial medulla, parabrachial nucleus, descending pain modulation, insula, chronic pain
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Brain Stem, Cognition, Cues, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Pain, Pain Threshold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review