Cited by 73COVID-19 and Mental HealthImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Relationship Between problematic social media usage and employee depression: a moderated mediation model of mindfulness and fear of COVID-19

Open access
Majeed, Mehwish, Irshad, Muhammad, Fatima, Tasneem, Khan, Jabran, Hassan, Muhammad Mubbashar·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Social media plays a significant role in modern life, but excessive use of it during the COVID-19 pandemic has become a source of concern. Supported by the conservation of resources theory, the current study extends the literature on problematic social media usage during COVID-19 by investigating its association with emotional and mental health outcomes. In a moderated mediation model, this study proposes that problematic social media use by workers during COVID-19 is linked to fear of COVID-19, which is further associated with depression. The current study tested trait mindfulness as an important personal resource that may be associated with reduced fear of COVID-19 despite problematic social media use. The study collected temporally separate data to avoid common method bias. Pakistani employees (N = 267) working in different organizations completed a series of survey questionnaires. The results supported the moderated mediation model, showing that problematic social media use during the current pandemic is linked to fear of COVID-19 and depression among employees. Furthermore, trait mindfulness was found to be an important buffer, reducing the negative indirect association between problematic social media use and depression through fear of COVID-19. These results offer implications for practitioners. The limitations of this study and future research directions are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557987

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is substantial evidence in adults that trait mindfulness promotes resilience to COVID-19 stressors.

    “There is substantial evidence in adults that trait mindfulness promotes resilience to COVID-19 stressors [46–51].”

    From Mindfulness supports emotional resilience in children during the COVID-19 pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Results (Hypothesis Testing; page not available in our copy) find that higher employee mindfulness weakens the association between problematic social media use and fear of COVID-19. This supports a protective role in that specific setting, but not the broader claim of substantial evidence across adults and COVID-19 stressors. The Theory and Hypothesis Development section says little was known about trait mindfulness’s benefits for COVID-19-related negative emotions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dispositional mindfulness is related to enhanced wellbeing and reduced psychological distress associated with the pandemic.

    “It has also been related to enhanced wellbeing and reduced psychological distress associated with the pandemic (Conversano et al., 2020; Majeed et al., 2020; Wielgus et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Aiken L. S. West S. G. Reno R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  2. Hair J. F. Black W. C. Babin B. J. Anderson R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Limited.
  3. Hayes A. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  4. Myers R. H. Myers R. H. (1990). Classical and Modern Regression with Applications, Vol. 2 Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Majeed, M., Irshad, M., Fatima, T., Khan, J., & Hassan, M. M.
Affiliations
  • International Islamic University, Islamabad (PK)
  • University of Lahore (PK)
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • Capital University of Science and Technology (PK)
Corresponding author
Majeed, Mehwish
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-12-16
Volume
11
Pages
557987-557987
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111254469
Cited by
73
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
social media addiction, fear of COVID-19, trait mindfulness, moderated mediation, conservation of resources theory, COVID-19 pandemic, employee mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review