Cited by 118COVID-19 and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingEducation during COVID-19 pandemic

A Study on the Psychological Wound of COVID-19 in University Students

Open access
Padrón, Isabel, Fraga, Isabel, Vieitez, Lucía, Montes, Carlos, Romero, Estrella·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

An increasing number of studies have addressed the psychological impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the general population. Nevertheless, far less is known about the impact on specific populations such as university students, whose psychological vulnerability has been shown in previous research. This study sought to examine different indicators of mental health in university students during the Spanish lockdown; we also analyzed the main sources of stress perceived by students in relation to the COVID-19 crisis, and the coping strategies adopted when faced with the situation. Data was collected from 932 students (704 women) through a web-based platform. Measures of anxiety (i.e., GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), irritability, and self-perceived change in mental health were administered, as well as ad hoc measures of stressors and coping strategies. Results indicated that students experienced considerable psychological problems during the confinement, with higher rates of emotional difficulties in women and undergraduate students than in men and postgraduates, respectively. Psychological distress was mainly related to several specific domains of stressors, as perceived by the participants: academic future, task overload, worsening of interpersonal conflicts, and restrictions in pleasant social contact; and far less related to the spread of the disease and its consequences for physical health. As regards coping strategies, both reframing skills and daily routines were shown to be the most effective. A path-analysis model integrating stressors, coping, and mental health revealed that coping strategies partially mediated the effect of stressors on psychological health. In general, results suggest that students' psychological health was substantially affected by the COVID-19 situation and that the academic and relational changes were the most notable sources of stress. This study reinforces the need to monitor and promote mental health in university students to boost resilience in times of crisis. Our results on effective coping strategies may inform preventive programs aimed at helping students to deal with challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589927

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Byrne B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modelling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
  2. Cooper C. Quick J. C. (2017). The Handbook of Stress and Health: A Guide to Research and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons 168– 185.
  3. Crocker P. R. E. Tammien K. A. Gaudreau P. (2015). “ Coping in sport,” in Contemporary Advances in Sport Psychology: A Review, ed. Hanton S. D. M. S. (Oxon: Routledge), 28– 67.
  4. Midlarsky E. (1991). “ Helping as coping,” in Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 12 ed. Clark M. S. (London: Sage Publications, Inc), 238– 264.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padrón, I., Fraga, I., Vieitez, L., Montes, C., & Romero, E.
Affiliations
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Corresponding author
Romero, Estrella
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-01-26
Volume
12
Pages
589927-589927
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122493339
Cited by
118
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 26
FWCI
16.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositorio institucional da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (University of Santiago de Compostela) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, university students, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, stressors, coping strategies, lockdown, gender differences, academic stress, interpersonal conflict, social isolation, resilience, mental health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review