CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184Gender Diversity and InequalityWork-Family Balance ChallengesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Glass Ceiling for Women Managers: Antecedents and Consequences for Work-Family Interface and Well-Being at Work

Open access
Babic, Audrey, Hansez, Isabelle·2021·Frontiers in Psychology
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250PMC PMC7985459
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Despite significant promotion of diversity in companies, as well as legislation for equal opportunities for women and men, it must be noted that women still remain largely in the minority in decision-making positions. This observation reflects the phenomenon of the glass ceiling that constitutes vertical discrimination within companies against women. Although the glass ceiling has generated research interest, some authors have pointed out that theoretical models have made little attempt to develop an understanding of this phenomenon and its implications. Therefore, our study aims to fill this gap and to better understand the phenomenon of the glass ceiling by considering both its antecedents and its possible consequences. More precisely, we extend the model developed by Elacqua et al. (2009), proposing a more comprehensive model including organizational gender culture as a third factor (in addition to situational and interpersonal issues) in the emergence of the glass ceiling through the perception of differential treatment. We also investigated the glass ceiling’s consequences for organizational attitudes and well-being at work by considering work-to-family conflict (WFC) as a possible mediator. We surveyed 320 women in managerial positions in a Belgian organization. Our study highlights the importance of all three factors in the emergence of the perception of differential treatment and, ultimately, the perception that a glass ceiling exists. Moreover, our results show that WFC fully mediates the effects of the glass ceiling on job strain and job engagement, and partially mediates the effects of the glass ceiling on job satisfaction and intention to quit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 Hypothesized theoretical model. WFC, work-to-family conflict.
FIGURE 1 Hypothesized theoretical model. WFC, work-to-family conflict.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 2 Completely standardized path coefficients for the retained model (Model 8); WFC, work-to-family conflict. For the sake of clarity, only structural relationships are shown. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 2 Completely standardized path coefficients for the retained model (Model 8); WFC, work-to-family conflict. For the sake of clarity, only structural relationships are shown. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Brislin, 1980, “Translation and content analysis of oral and written material,” in, Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 398
  2. Elkin, 2006, A review of mentorat relationships: formation, function, benefits and dysfunction., Otago Manag. Graduate Rev., 4, 11
  3. 2013, Femmes au Sommet 2012.
  4. Jöreskog, 2006, LISREL 8.80 for Window.
  5. Peeters, 2013, “Consequences of combining work and family roles: a closer look at cross-domain versus within-domain relations,” in, New Frontiers in Work and Family Research, 93
  6. Vinokur-Kaplan, 2009, “Motivating work performance in human services organizations,” in, The Handbook of Human Services Management, 209

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 184

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Babic, A., & Hansez, I.
Affiliations
University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Babic, Audrey
ORCID
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2021-03-09
Volume
12
Pages
618250-618250
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250
PMC
PMC7985459
OpenAlex
W3133906889
Cited by
184
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 2
FWCI
37.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Université de Liège
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
glass ceiling, women in management, gender discrimination, work-to-family conflict, job strain, work engagement, job satisfaction, turnover intention, work-family interface, women in leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review