Cited by 28Behavioral Health and InterventionsGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Self-efficacy in habit building: how general and habit-specific self-efficacy influence behavioral automatization and motivational interference

Open access
Stojanovic, Marco, Fries, Stefan, Grund, Axel·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the role of self-efficacy (SE) in intentional habit building. We analyzed event sampling data from a habit building app we created that helps define and track habit data. We used hierarchical growth curve modeling and multilevel mediation to test our hypotheses. In a first study, N = 91 university students built new study habits over a period of 6 weeks in a controlled study. We found that the trait-like (Level 2) general self-efficacy predicted automaticity (i.e., habit strength) but not the experience of motivational interference (MI). In a second study with real user data, N = 265 idiographic habits have been analyzed. The specific SE associated with these habits – habit-specific self-efficacy (Level 1, HSE) – was measured during habit formation. We found that lagged HSE predicted automaticity and that lagged automaticity predicted HSE, indicating a positive feedback mechanism in habit building. Furthermore, we found that lagged HSE predicted less MI during habit performance. A multilevel mediation analysis showed significant effects of lagged HSE (Level 1) and aggregated HSE (Level 2) on MI, which were both partially mediated by automaticity. These results show the importance of defining the specificity of SE beliefs and how they interact with automaticity in the habit building process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643753

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automaticity is associated with less want conflicts and less motivational interference during habit performance and with more habit-specific self-efficacy.

    “Automaticity is associated with less want conflicts (i.e., wanting to do something else) and less motivational interference (Stojanovic et al., 2020) during habit performance and with more habit-specific self-efficacy (Stojanovic et al., 2021).”

    From Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment (2022) · cites this paper as Stojanovic et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bandura A. (1994). “ Self-efficacy,” in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Vol. 4 ed. Ramachaudran V. S. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 71– 81.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stojanovic, M., Fries, S., & Grund, A.
Affiliations
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
Corresponding author
Stojanovic, Marco
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-05-07
Volume
12
Pages
643753-643753
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160604414
Cited by
28
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Universität Bielefeld
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
self-efficacy, general self-efficacy, habit strength, habit formation, positive feedback loop, study habits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review