Cited by 851Education, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter?

Komarraju, Meera, Nadler, Dustin·2013·Learning and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.005

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D.
Affiliations
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
Komarraju, Meera
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
25
Pages
67-72
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083614944
Cited by
851
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 6
FWCI
42.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
self-efficacy, academic performance, implicit theories of intelligence, achievement goals, mastery goals, performance goals, effort regulation, help-seeking, metacognitive strategies, motivation, grade point average, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review