Cited by 13Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Research TopicsMental Health and Psychiatry

Benefits of social contact in individuals with psychotic symptoms: do closeness of the contact and empathic skills make the difference?

Open access
Krijnen, Lisa J. G., Lemmers-Jansen, Imke L. J., Fett, Anne-Kathrin J., Krabbendam, Lydia·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Objectives: Social contact is known to be beneficial for humans’ mental health. Individuals with psychotic symptoms (PS) tend to show poorer social and interpersonal functioning. However, in this patient population, social contact may be crucial for their mental wellbeing and treatment success. Additionally, closeness of social contact (familiar versus less familiar others), rather than only the presence or absence of social contacts, may play an important role. Empathy may heighten the beneficial effects of social/close contact on mental health, facilitating interactions. We investigated the association between social contact and closeness of contact on mental health, defined as positive symptoms, positive affect and negative affect in PS and control participants, with empathy as a moderator. Methods: Participants were 16–30 years old. Information regarding social/close contact and mental health was obtained using the experience sampling method in individuals with PS (n = 29) and healthy controls (n = 28). Empathy was measured using a self-report questionnaire. Results: Social contact was associated with higher positive affect in the total sample. Contact with close as opposed to less close others was related to better mental health: It was associated with lower positive symptoms in the PS group, and with more positive affect in the total sample. Empathy moderated the association between closeness of contact and positive affect in the total sample, in which the combination of higher levels of empathy combined with the presence of close contact was associated with higher positive affect in the total sample. However, the direct association between empathy and positive affect was not significant per group of contact. Conclusion: The results suggest that social contact, but especially contact with a close other is important for mental health outcomes: Contact with close others is beneficial for positive affect in the total sample and for positive symptoms in individuals with PS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769091

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A strong therapeutic alliance is an essential ingredient for treatment success.

    “Lastly, our intervention was supposed to support patients’ recovery by providing positive social support and with this foster peer group relationships, and a strong therapeutic alliance found to be essential ingredients for treatment success (132, 133).”

    From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links contact with close friends or family to better outcomes in people with psychotic symptoms, but does not address the therapeutic alliance between patient and clinician. Searches for “therapeutic alliance treatment success” and “therapeutic relationship alliance therapy effectiveness” found no passage supporting the claimed essential role in treatment success. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. De Vries M. W. (ed.) (1992). Practical issues in psychiatric applications of ESM. The Experience of Psychopathology: Investigating Mental Disorders In Their Natural Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 317– 323.
  2. McDonald N. M. Messinger D. S. (2011). “ The development of empathy: How, when, and why,” in Moral Behavior And Free will: A Neurobiological And Philosophical Approach, eds Sanguineti J. J. Acerbi A. Lombo J. A. (London: IF Press), 333– 359.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krijnen, L. J. G., Lemmers-Jansen, I. L. J., Fett, A.-K. J., & Krabbendam, L.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • City, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Krijnen, Lisa J. G.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-12-16
Volume
12
Pages
769091-769091
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200389546
Cited by
13
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Hersenstichting (KS2011(1)-75)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
social contact, psychotic symptoms, empathy, positive affect, negative affect, positive symptoms, mental health, interpersonal functioning, young adults, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review