Cited by 7Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSport Psychology and PerformancePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Psychometric Properties of the Mindfulness Inventory for Sport (German Version)

Open access
Wieczorek, Alissa, Renner, Karl-Heinz, Schrank, Florian, Seiler, Kirstin, Wagner, Matthias·2022·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Mindfulness-based training programs are highly established in competitive and recreational sports. One of the best-known approaches is the Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment Approach (MAC) by Gardner and Moore), which integrates mindfulness aspects of awareness, non-judgmental attitude, and focus. Based on these aspects, Thienot and colleagues developed and validated an English language sport-specific questionnaire, the so-called Mindfulness Inventory for Sport (MIS), for the assessment of mindfulness skills in athletes. The aim of this study is to psychometrically test a German language version of the MIS (MIS-D). To assess the psychometric properties, the MIS-D was examined in an online survey with an integrated test–retest design (n = 228) for reliability (internal consistency; test–retest reliability), validity (factorial; convergent), and measurement invariance (gender; competition type). The present results support the psychometric quality of the German language version of the MIS. Necessary replications should among others focus on checking the measurement invariance for further relevant subgroups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864208

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Aherne C. Moran A. P. Lonsdale C. (2011). The effect of mindfulness training on athletes’ flow: an initial investigation. The Sport Psychol. 25, 177– 189. doi: 10.1123/tsp.25.2.177 · DOI
  2. Altstötter-Gleich C. Bergemann N. (2006). Testgüte einer deutschsprachigen Version der Mehrdimensionalen Perfektionismus Skala von Frost, Marten, Lahart und Rosenblate (MPS-F). Diagnostica 52, 105– 118. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.52.3.105 · DOI
  3. Amelang M. Schmidt-Atzert L. (2006). Psychologische Diagnostik und Intervention: Mit 3 neuen Anwendungsfeldern (4., vollst. überarb. und erw. Aufl.). Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer Medizin.
  4. Baer R. A. Smith G. T. Allen K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment 11, 191– 206. doi: 10.1177/1073191104268029 15358875 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bentler P. M. Bonett D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 588– 606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
  6. Berger U. (2019). Interne Konsistenz von Fragebogen-Skalen: Alpha oder Omega? PPmP - Psychotherapie Psychosomatik. Medizinische Psychologie 69, 348– 349. doi: 10.1055/a-0878-1270 31382310 · DOI
  7. Bishop S. R. Lau M. Shapiro S. Carlsom L. Anderson N. D. Carmody J.. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 11, 230– 241. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/bph077 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Briggs S. R. Cheek J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J. Pers. 54, 106– 148. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x · DOI
  9. Brown K. W. Ryan R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 822– 848. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822, PMID: 12703651 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Browne M. W. Cudeck R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 21, 230– 258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Bühner M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion (4., korrigierte und erweiterte Auflage). Pearson Studium.
  12. Campbell D. T. Fiske D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56, 81– 105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016 13634291 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cheung G. W. Rensvold R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 9, 233– 255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cox B. J. Enns M. W. Clara I. P. (2002). The multidimensional structure of perfectionism in clinically distressed and college student samples. Psychol. Assess. 14, 365– 373. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.14.3.365, PMID: 12214443 · DOI
  15. Csikszentmihalyi M. (1978). “ Attention and the holistic approach to behavior” in Emotions, Personality, and Psychotherapy. The Stream of Consciousness: Scientific Investigations into the Flow of Human Experience. eds. Pope K. S. Singer J. L. (New York: Springer US), 335– 358.
  16. Dimitrov D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev. 43, 121– 149. doi: 10.1177/0748175610373459 · DOI
  17. DiStefano C. Morgan G. B. (2014). A comparison of diagonal weighted least squares robust estimation techniques for ordinal data. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 21, 425– 438. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.915373 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Fornell C. Larcker D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39. doi: 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Frost R. O. Marten P. Lahart C. Rosenblate R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cogn. Ther. Res. 14, 449– 468. doi: 10.1007/BF01172967 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Furr R. M. (2021). Psychometrics: An Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  21. Hewitt P. L. Flett G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60, 456– 470. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456, PMID: 2027080 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hill A. P. Mallinson-Howard S. H. Jowett G. E. (2018). Multidimensional perfectionism in sport: a meta-analytical review. Sport Exerc. Perform. Psychol. 7, 235– 270. doi: 10.1037/spy0000125 · DOI
  23. Hinterman C. Burns L. Hopwood D. Rogers W. (2012). Mindfulness: seeking a more perfect approach to coping with life’s challenges. Mindfulness 3, 275– 281. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0091-8 · DOI
  24. Hu L. Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 6, 1– 55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Jackson S. A. Martin A. J. Eklund R. C. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: the construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 30, 561– 587. doi: 10.1123/jsep.30.5.561, PMID: 18971512 · DOI
  26. Jansen P. Seidl F. Richter S. (2019). Achtsamkeit im Sport. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
  27. Josefsson T. Ivarsson A. Lindwall M. Gustafsson H. Stenling A. Böröy J.. (2017). Mindfulness mechanisms in sports: mediating effects of rumination and emotion regulation on sport-specific coping. Mindfulness 8, 1354– 1363. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0711-4, PMID: 28989551 PMC5605575 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kelava A. Moosbrugger H. (2011). “ Deskriptivstatistische evaluation von items (Itemanalyse) und Testwertverteilungen,” in Springer-Lehrbuch. Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. 2nd Edn. eds. Moosbrugger H. Kelava A. (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer), 75– 102.
  29. Kline R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Methodology in the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford Press.
  30. Li C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav. Res. Methods 48, 936– 949. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7, PMID: 26174714 · DOI · Paper page
  31. MacKinnon D. P. Krull J. L. Lockwood C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev. Sci. 1, 173– 181. doi: 10.1023/A:1026595011371, PMID: 11523746 PMC2819361 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Meade A. W. Johnson E. C. Braddy P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. J. Appl. Psychol. 93, 568– 592. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568, PMID: 18457487 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Messick S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am. Psychol. 50, 741– 749. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Michalak J. Heidenreich T. Ströhle G. Nachtigall C. (2008). Die deutsche Version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) Psychometrische Befunde zu einem Achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Z. Klin. Psychol. Psychother. 37, 200– 208. doi: 10.1026/1616-3443.37.3.200 · DOI
  35. Moran A. (2012). Thinking in action: some insights from cognitive sport psychology. Think. Skills Creat. 7, 85– 92. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.03.005 · DOI
  36. Noetel M. Ciarrochi J. Sahdra B. Lonsdale C. (2019a). Using genetic algorithms to abbreviate the mindfulness inventory for sport: a substantive-methodological synthesis. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 45: 101545. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101545 · DOI
  37. Peterson R. A. Kim Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. J. Appl. Psychol. 98, 194– 198. doi: 10.1037/a0030767, PMID: 23127213 · DOI
  38. Putnick D. L. Bornstein M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev. Rev. 41, 71– 90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004, PMID: 27942093 PMC5145197 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Renner K.-H. Hock M. Bergner-Köther R. Laux L. (2018). Differentiating anxiety and depression: the state-trait anxiety-depression inventory. Cognit. Emot. 32, 1409– 1423. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1266306, PMID: 27928931 · DOI
  40. Rheinberg F. Vollmeyer R. Engeser S. (2003). “ Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens,” in Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept: Tests und Trends. Vol. 16 (Göttingen: Hogrefe), 261– 279.
  41. Rice K. G. Ashby J. S. Slaney R. B. (1998). Self-esteem as a mediator between perfectionism and depression: a structural equations analysis. J. Couns. Psychol. 45, 304– 314. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.304 · DOI
  42. Rigdon E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: a comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 3, 369– 379. doi: 10.1080/10705519609540052 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Roger D. Najarian B. (1989). The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring emotion control. Personal. Individ. Differ. 10, 845– 853. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(89)90020-2 · DOI
  44. Sappington R. Longshore K. (2015). Systematically reviewing the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions for enhanced athletic performance. J. Clin. Sport Psychol. 9, 232– 262. doi: 10.1123/jcsp.2014-0017 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Satorra A. (2000). “ Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures,” in Springer eBook Collection: Vol. 36. Innovations in Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Festschrift for Heinz Neudecker. Vol. 36. eds. Heijmans R. D. H. Pollock D. S. G. Satorra A. (Berlin: Springer)
  46. Satorra A. Bentler P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 66, 507– 514. doi: 10.1007/BF02296192 PMC2905175 20640194 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Schindler S. (2020). Ein achtsamer Blick auf den Achtsamkeits-Hype. Organ. Superv. Coach. 27, 111– 124. doi: 10.1007/s11613-020-00641-z · DOI
  48. Scott-Hamilton J. Schutte N. S. Brown R. F. (2016). Effects of a mindfulness intervention on sports-anxiety, pessimism, and flow in competitive cyclists. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 8, 85– 103. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12063, PMID: 26970111 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Segal Z. V. Williams J. M. G. Teasdale J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: A New Approach to Preventing Relapse. New York: Guilford Press.
  50. Si G. Lo C. H. Zhang C. Q. (2016). “ Mindfulness training program for Chinese athletes and its effectiveness,” in Mindfulness and Performance. ed. A. Baltzell (New York: Cambridge University Press), 235– 267.
  51. Slaney R. B. Ashby J. S. Trippi J. (1995). Perfectionism: its measurement and career relevance. J. Career Assess. 3, 279– 297. doi: 10.1177/106907279500300403 · DOI
  52. Smith R. E. Smoll F. L. Cumming S. P. Grossbard J. R. (2006). Measurement of multidimensional sport performance anxiety in children and adults: The sport anxiety Scale-2. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 28, 479– 501. doi: 10.1123/jsep.28.4.479 · DOI
  53. Steyer R. Mayer A. Geiser C. Cole D. A. (2015). A theory of states and traits—revised. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 11, 71– 98. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153719 25062476 · DOI
  54. Steyer R. Schmitt M. Eid M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. Eur. J. Personal. 13, 389– 408. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  55. Streiner D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J. Pers. Assess. 80, 99– 103. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18, PMID: 12584072 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Stumpf H. Parker W. D. (2000). A hierarchical structural analysis of perfectionism and its relation to other personality characteristics. Personal. Individ. Differ. 28, 837– 852. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00141-5 · DOI
  57. Trapnell P. D. Campbell J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: distinguishing rumination from reflection. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 284– 304. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.284, PMID: 10074710 · DOI · Paper page
  58. van de Schoot R. Lugtig P. Hox J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 9, 486– 492. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.686740 · DOI · Paper page
  59. van Dyke E. D. Metzger A. Zizzi S. J. (2021). Being mindful of perfectionism and performance among collegiate gymnasts: a person-centered approach. J. Clin. Sport Psychol. 15, 143– 161. doi: 10.1123/jcsp.2019-0100 · DOI
  60. Woll A. Kurth B.-M. Opper E. Worth A. Bös K. (2011). The ‘Motorik-Modul’ (MoMo): physical fitness and physical activity in German children and adolescents. Eur. J. Pediatr. 170, 1129– 1142. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1391-4, PMID: 21318230 · DOI
  61. Zizzi S. J. (Ed.). (2017). Being Mindful in Sport and Exercise Psychology: Pathways for Practitioners and Students. Morgantown, WV: FiT Publishing, a Division of the International Center for Performance Excellence, West Virginia University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wieczorek, A., Renner, K.-H., Schrank, F., Seiler, K., & Wagner, M.
Affiliations
Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
Corresponding author
Wieczorek, Alissa
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2022-05-24
Volume
13
Pages
864208-864208
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285742307
Cited by
7
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
athletes, German translation, psychometric validation, measurement invariance, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, factorial validity, convergent validity, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review