Cited by 75Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

Vortioxetine for cognitive enhancement in major depression: From animal models to clinical research

Open access
Bennabi, Djamila, Haffen, Emmanuel, Van Waes, Vincent·2019·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: Vortioxetine, has already shown its efficacy in the acute and long-term treatment of MDD, and its interest in the prevention of relapse. The aim of this study was to review the current status of knowledge regarding cognitive effects of vortioxetine. Methods: We conducted a review of key data obtained from preclinical behavioral models and clinical trials in MDD focusing on vortioxetine-induced cognitive changes. Results: In animal, acute and chronic administration of vortioxetine improved performance on objective measures that cover a broad range of cognitive domains. In human, vortioxetine appears as a useful treatment option in patients with MDD, especially in the presence of cognitive dysfunction. Conclusion: Vortioxetine constitutes a promising treatment for treatment of cognitive impairment in MDD, but its place in the therapeutic armamentarium still need to be determined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00771

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennabi, D., Haffen, E., & Van Waes, V.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Bennabi, Djamila
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2019-11-06
Volume
10
Pages
771-771
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984384647
Cited by
75
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
vortioxetine, major depressive disorder, cognitive enhancement, cognitive impairment, animal models of depression, behavioral models, antidepressant effects, relapse prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review