Cited by 80Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesConservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Programmatic approaches to assessing and improving animal welfare in zoos and aquariums

Barber, Joseph C.E.·2009·Zoo Biology

Abstract

There continues to be intense public, professional, and scientific focus on the welfare of animals in zoos and aquariums, but implementing welfare assessment tools consistently throughout this community remains challenging. Indirect measures can be used to assess "welfare potential"-the potential that animals will experience good welfare based on the care that they are provided with. Zoos and aquariums focus on welfare potential with their continued commitment to develop animal care guidelines (e.g. Animal Care Manuals) that can play a role within institutional accreditation or certification. The Association of Zoos and Aquariums Animal Welfare Committee has been pursuing approaches to maximize welfare potential by developing the concept of an integrated welfare approach or framework-an attempt to identify recommended animal care programs (e.g. enrichment, nutrition, veterinary care, research, and animal training programs) and their programmatic components. Objectively assessing the influence that animal care recommendations have on the welfare of individual animals is important to determine the efficacy of programmatic approaches. The future of welfare assessment within zoos and aquariums will include population-level evaluations-tracking emerging trends in health and behavior that come from both formal and informal institutional animal reports. Sharing this information, and performing meta-analyses of the data using epidemiological approaches, will become easier with advances in technology and database management software. Identifying welfare "red/green flags" throughout captive populations will provide direction for more focused assessments that will ultimately inform the design of more effective animal care programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.20260

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barber, J. C. E.
Affiliations
Hunter College (US)
Corresponding author
Barber, Joseph C.E.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-10
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
519-530
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W2165548372
Cited by
80
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
animal welfare assessment, zoos and aquariums, institutional accreditation, animal enrichment
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Epidemiologic Methods, Quality Assurance, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review