The DOI matches its Crossref record; 202 of the 204 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 207 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy
Open accessAbstract
Cancer is a multifactorial pathology and it represents the second leading cause of death worldwide. In the recent years, numerous studies highlighted the dual role of the gut microbiota in preserving host’s health. Gut resident bacteria are able to produce a number of metabolites and bioproducts necessary to protect host’s and gut’s homeostasis. Conversely, several microbiota subpopulations may expand during pathological dysbiosis and therefore produce high levels of toxins capable, in turn, to trigger both inflammation and tumorigenesis. Importantly, gut microbiota can interact with the host either modulating directly the gut epithelium or the immune system. Numerous gut populating bacteria, called probiotics, have been identified as protective against the genesis of tumors. Given their capability of preserving gut homeostasis, probiotics are currently tested to help to fight dysbiosis in cancer patients subjected to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Most recently, three independent studies show that specific gut resident species may potentiate the positive outcome of anti-cancer immunotherapy. The highly significant studies, uncovering the tight association between gut microbiota and tumorigenesis, as well as gut microbiota and anti-cancer therapy, are here described. The role of the Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), as the most studied probiotic model in cancer, is also reported. Overall, according to the findings here summarized, novel strategies integrating probiotics, such as LGG, with conventional anti-cancer therapies are strongly encouraged.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This narrative review summarizes the dual role of gut microbiota in cancer, from tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting mechanisms to modulation of anti-cancer therapy. It highlights probiotics, especially *Lactobacillus rhamnosus* GG (LGG), and the emerging evidence linking specific gut species to immunotherapy response.
Key findings
- Gut microbiota can be tumor-suppressive or oncogenic: microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate and propionate inhibit histone deacetylases, while dysbiosis-associated pathogens can release toxins causing DNA breaks; microbial pathogens are stated to drive 20% of tumorigenesis.
- LGG is described as the most studied probiotic model in cancer, with anti-inflammatory effects, attenuation of 5-FU- and radiation-mediated gut epithelial injury in animal models, anti-proliferative/anti-metastatic effects in colorectal, ovary, breast, cervical, hepatic and oral squamous in vitro tumor models, prevention of polyps in a colorectal APC/min mouse model, and reduction of colitis-associated cancer in mice.
- Inflammasomes are double-edged in tumorigenesis: in colorectal cancer they are protective via IL-18, whereas in lung, skin, breast and pancreatic cancer IL-1β is pro-inflammatory and tumor-promoting; NLRP6 regulates susceptibility to intestinal inflammation through microbiome-modulatory activity.
- Three independent 2018 studies linked gut microbiome composition to immune checkpoint inhibitor response; anti-PD1 responders were enriched in taxa such as *Akkermansia*, *Alistipes*, *Clostridiales*, *Ruminococcaceae*, *Faecalibacteriae*, *Bifidobacterium longum*, *Enterococcus faecium* and *Collinsella aerofaciens*, and antibiotics were associated with lower survival in melanoma patients treated with anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1.
Methods
- Narrative review; no systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, or meta-analysis is stated.
- Synthesizes preclinical studies (in vitro and mouse models), clinical trials, and translational studies, including three 2018 studies on microbiome and immunotherapy; no primary data are generated.
- Main analysis is qualitative synthesis of mechanisms and therapeutic implications, with referenced tables of LGG and clinical studies.
Limitations
- The paper states that microbiome research is at its beginning, associative and functional studies need corroboration by larger clinical studies, no strong bacterial oncogenic driver has been identified, and it is difficult to determine whether microbiota changes affect cancer genesis or vice versa.
- The paper notes that lifestyle, diet, immune status and anti-cancer treatment itself influence the microbiome, and that larger controlled trials are needed to confirm probiotic efficacy and safety; FMT lacks control because whole microbiota is transferred, and donor health must be carefully controlled.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not describe a systematic literature search, study selection, or risk-of-bias assessment.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures



Verification
Claims the paper makes
133 Not checked yet · 11 Own interpretation · 4 Partly supported · 1 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Multiple studies using different mice deficient for inflammasomes components (including NLRP3, NLRP1, NLRP6, NLRC4 and Caspase-1) found that the inflammasomes protect mice from colitis-associated CRC [120,121,122,123,124].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [120] Zaki, 2011, The NLRP3 inflammasome: Contributions to intestinal homeostasis, Trends Immunol. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section on colitis-associated tumorigenesis (page unavailable) reports increased tumor formation in Nlrp3-deficient mice and similar findings for caspase-1-deficient mice. The section on intestinal epithelial homeostasis also reports protection by NLRC4. The copy does not report colitis-associated colorectal cancer findings from NLRP1- or NLRP6-deficient mice; its reference to NLRP1 concerns expression in human tissues. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [121] Allen, 2010, The NLRP3 inflammasome functions as a negative regulator of tumorigenesis during colitis-associated cancer, J. Exp. Med. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports that NLRP3, PYCARD, and caspase-1 protect mice against colitis-associated cancer. It also reports no significant difference for NLRC4-deficient mice, while the Experimental animals section lists no NLRP1- or NLRP6-deficient mice. This source therefore supports the claim for some, but not all, of the listed components. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked yetcites [122] Hu, 2010, Inflammation-induced tumorigenesis in the colon is regulated by caspase-1 and NLRC4, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
- Not checked yetcites [123] Yeretssian, 2010, Control of intestinal homeostasis, colitis, and colitis-associated colorectal cancer by the inflammatory caspases, Immunity source
- Partly supportedcites [124] Zaki, 2010, IL-18 production downstream of the NLRP3 inflammasome confers protection against colorectal tumor formation, J. Immunol. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports significantly greater AOM/DSS-induced tumor burdens in Nlrp3-, ASC-, and Casp1-deficient mice than in wild-type mice, supporting a protective role for those inflammasome components. This paper does not establish the same finding for NLRP1, NLRP6, or NLRC4; the sentence cites several studies collectively, but does not specify which citation supports those additional components. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The probiotics, including Lactobacilli, are studied as supportive treatment for chemotherapy-associated gastrointestinal toxicity, thanks to their ability to restore gut microbial balance, as further described in Section 5 [86].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [86] Lee, 2014, Gastro-intestinal toxicity of chemotherapeutics in colorectal cancer: The role of inflammation, World J. Gastroenterol. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusion (page unavailable) discusses supportive strategies for chemotherapy-related GI toxicity, and the GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1 AND -2 section discusses GLP-based approaches. Neither addresses probiotics or Lactobacilli restoring gut microbial balance; searches for those terms and intestinal flora found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The explanation is that commensal microbiome members within the gut of the mice might produce TLR agonists, thus promoting the rise of an oxidative stress milieu and tumor cell death.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [165] Iida, 2013, Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment, Science sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s discussion of oxaliplatin experiments (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) suggests that gut commensals may prime tumor-associated cells through TLR-related microbial product sensing. It also links commensal-dependent reactive oxygen species production to chemotherapy-induced tumor damage. The proposed TLR-agonist mechanism was investigated rather than directly demonstrated, and the oxidative damage and tumor-cell death described depend on platinum chemotherapy—not on microbial products alone. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, the gut microbiome can either be tumor-suppressive or oncogenic [22,23].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Fulbright, L.E., Ellermann, M., and Arthur, J.C. (2017). The microbiome and the hallmarks of cancer. PLoS Pathog., 13. source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Gagnaire, 2017, Collateral damage: Insights into bacterial mechanisms that predispose host cells to cancer, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A number of these hormones can be sensed by the gut bacteria, as in the case of leptin and ghrelin, which, in turn, finely tune the gut microbiota composition in rodents [29,30].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Ravussin, 2012, Responses of gut microbiota to diet composition and weight loss in lean and obese mice, Obesity source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Queipo-Ortuño, M.I., Seoane, L.M., Murri, M., Pardo, M., Gomez-Zumaquero, J.M., Cardona, F., Casanueva, F., and Tinahones, F.J. (2013). Gut microbiota composition in male rat models under different nutritional status and physical activity and its association with serum leptin and ghrelin levels. PLoS ONE, 8. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Metabolomics and metagenomics studies highlighted the dual role of the gastro-intestinal microbiome in cancer prevention, tumorigenesis and anti-cancer therapy [21].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Knight, 2017, The Microbiome and Human Biology, Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In particular, it is known that host’s hormones and neuro-hormones are able to modify the gut microbiome composition, as during stress response [27].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Sandrini, 2015, Microbial endocrinology: Host-bacteria communication within the gut microbiome, J. Endocrinol. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Among the human symbiotic microbial populations, the gut microbiota is the most extensively studied and it deeply influences host’s homeostasis [7].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Feng, 2018, Gut Microbiota: An Integral Moderator in Health and Disease, Front. Microbiol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Progresses in metagenomics studies, together with the advancements in transcriptomics and metabolomics, allowed to describe the impact of individual bacterial species on host’s health [15,16].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The link has been found both with local gastro-intestinal cancers, as well as with other distal tumors [20].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Goodman, 2018, The microbiome and cancer, J. Pathol. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the recent years, numerous evidences pointed towards the central role of commensal bacteria colonizing body surfaces as key determinants of health or pathologic conditions, including cancer [6].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Zhang, 2015, Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases, Int. J. Mol. Sci. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Importantly, gastro-intestinal dysbiosis has been linked with both local and distant tumors [52].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Sheflin, 2014, Cancer-promoting effects of microbial dysbiosis, Curr. Oncol. Rep. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although only Helicobacter pylori is included among class I carcinogens by the World Health Organization (WHO) [57], several studies performed in cell culture and animal models, assessed the ability of additional microbiota populations to affect host’s DNA replication and integrity [58,59,60].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Moss, 2017, The Clinical Evidence Linking, Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, Helicobacter pylori or Bacteroides fragilis are both able to activate the host’s spermine oxidase, which, in turn, generates hydrogen peroxide and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced accumulation of DNA damage [77,78].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] Goodwin, 2011, Polyamine catabolism contributes to enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-induced colon tumorigenesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
- Not checked yetcites [78] Chaturvedi, 2011, Spermine oxidase mediates the gastric cancer risk associated with Helicobacter pylori CagA, Gastroenterology source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Importantly, SCFAs have a role in controlling the glucose and the lipidic metabolism, by affecting the intestine hormone peptide secretion, including Peptide YY (PYY) and Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) [37].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Clarke, 2014, Minireview: Gut microbiota: The neglected endocrine organ, Mol. Endocrinol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In fact, it has been widely studied the link between bacterial secretion of the β-glucuronidase enzymes and the increased bioavailability of the host’s estrogen hormones (both originating from hepatic catabolism and phytoestrogens).”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Plottel, 2011, Microbiome and malignancy, Cell Host Microbe source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One good example is ferricrome metabolite secreted from Lactobacillus casei, able to trigger apoptosis in tumor cells via JNK pathway direct activation [44].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.2. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Suppressor
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Konishi, 2016, Probiotic-derived ferrichrome inhibits colon cancer progression via JNK-mediated apoptosis, Nat. Commun. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Regarding cancer, within a dysbiotic gut, certain bacterial pathogens can negatively affect either the host’s metabolism or the host’s gut and immune system functionalities, thereby triggering tumor growth [51].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Rea, 2018, Microbiota effects on cancer: From risks to therapies, Oncotarget source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the same way, the product of the cytotoxin associated gene A (CagA) from Helicobacter pylori, induces the proteasome-mediated degradation of p53 in gastric epithelial cells, by interfering with the host’s AKT pathway, thus promoting the rise of gastric cancer [66].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Buti, 2011, Helicobacter pylori cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) subverts the apoptosis-stimulating protein of p53 (ASPP2) tumor suppressor pathway of the host, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Gut dysbiosis and the consequent development of pathogenic populations within the gut microbiota, may contribute to a wide variety of pathologies, even in sites distant from the gut, ranging from bowel inflammation, to neurodegenerative diseases (including Parkinson’s disease) and cancer [43,49,50].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Warzecha, 2016, Synergic Interaction of Rifaximin and Mutaflor (Escherichia coli Nissle 1917) in the Treatment of Acetic Acid-Induced Colitis in Rats, Gastroenterol. Res. Pract.
- Not checked yetcites [49] Lane, 2017, The microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease: Current and therapeutic insights, J. Inflamm. Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [50] Caputi, V., and Giron, M.C. (2018). Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis and Toll-Like Receptors in Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“When gut dysbiosis is coupled with an increase in the β-glucuronidase-secreting bacteria, such as Clostridium leptum and Clostridium coccoides, the enzyme deconjugates liver-catabolized and plant-derived estrogens, enabling them to bind and activate the estrogen receptors expressed by target cells [81].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Plottel, 2011, Microbiome and malignancy, Cell Host Microbe source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, gut bacterial butyrate and propionate are able to inhibit host’s tumor cells histone deacetylases with a general anti-cancer effect.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.2. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Suppressor
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] Jan, 2002, Propionibacteria induce apoptosis of colorectal carcinoma cells via short-chain fatty acids acting on mitochondria, Cell Death Differ. source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Wei, 2016, Butyrate production from high-fiber diet protects against lymphoma tumor, Leuk. Lymphoma source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, during pathogenic infections, when the gut microbiome is affected by dysbiosis, bacterial pathogens can expand and release a large amount of toxins which, in turn, induce host’s DNA breaks, thus contributing to genomic instability, tumor initiation and progression in those predisposed cells [61,62,63].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] Halazonetis, 2004, Constitutively active DNA damage checkpoint pathways as the driving force for the high frequency of p53 mutations in human cancer, DNA Repair source
- Not checked yetcites [62] Yao, Y., and Dai, W. (2014). Genomic Instability and Cancer. J. Carcinog. Mutagen., 5.
- Not checked yetcites [63] Frisan, 2016, Bacterial genotoxins: The long journey to the nucleus of mammalian cells, Biochim. Biophys. Acta source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Additionally, it has been reported that gut resident commensals can produce hormone-like metabolites, such as the short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), as a consequence of the bacterial fermentation of dietary fibers in the large intestine [36].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Fukui, 2018, Role of Gut Microbiota-Gut Hormone Axis in the Pathophysiology of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, a number of gut commensals can modify small aminoacids into signaling molecules, as for example histidine to histamine or glutamate to γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [35].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Mohajeri, 2018, The role of the microbiome for human health: From basic science to clinical applications, Eur. J. Nutr. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Helicobacter pylori produced protein CagA was the first bacterial protein shown to be involved in human cancer [56].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] Hatakeyama, 2017, Structure and function of Helicobacter pylori CagA, the first-identified bacterial protein involved in human cancer, Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Estrogen receptors activation promotes cell proliferation in tissues responding to estrogens, as breast and endometrium [82].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] Sergio, 2003, Estrogen and antiestrogen regulation of cell cycle progression in breast cancer cells, Endocr. Relat. Cancer
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several commensal bacteria play a probiotic role thanks to their capability to confer health benefits, either protecting against gut dysbiosis or enhancing host’s immune defense mechanisms [22,24].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.2. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Suppressor
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The administration of such probiotics, as for example Mutaflor (Escherichia coli Nissle 1917) combined with the intestinal antibiotic rifaximin, demonstrated a clear anti-inflammatory activity, enhancing the anti-inflammatory effect of rifaximin in a rat model of inflammatory bowel disease [43].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.2. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Suppressor
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Warzecha, 2016, Synergic Interaction of Rifaximin and Mutaflor (Escherichia coli Nissle 1917) in the Treatment of Acetic Acid-Induced Colitis in Rats, Gastroenterol. Res. Pract.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the same direction, the Salmonella enterica effector avirulence protein A (AvrA) is able to translocate into host’s cells and activate β-catenin via its intrinsic de-ubiquitinase activity [70].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] Lu, 2014, Enteric bacterial protein AvrA promotes colonic tumorigenesis and activates colonic beta-catenin signaling pathway, Oncogenesis source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Such mechanism is mediated by the bacterial virulence factor Fap2, able to bind and block the NK inhibitory receptor TGIT, thus arresting the NK-mediated tumor cell attack [80].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Gur, 2015, Binding of the Fap2 protein of Fusobacterium nucleatum to human inhibitory receptor TIGIT protects tumors from immune cell attack, Immunity source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such mechanism is the cause of the anti-tumoral in vitro and in vivo effect of butyrate observed in both colorectal cancer (CRC) and lymphoma [38,39].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.2. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Suppressor
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] Jan, 2002, Propionibacteria induce apoptosis of colorectal carcinoma cells via short-chain fatty acids acting on mitochondria, Cell Death Differ. source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Wei, 2016, Butyrate production from high-fiber diet protects against lymphoma tumor, Leuk. Lymphoma source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Additionally, changes in the host’s lifestyle, diet and immune system are among the factors which deeply influence the microbiota composition and activity [85].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] Conlon, 2014, The impact of diet and lifestyle on gut microbiota and human health, Nutrients source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In line with that, many preclinical studies performed using germ-free mice models demonstrated how the gut microbiome is able to deeply affect cancer genesis and progression through different mechanisms [33,54,55].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Bultman, 2014, Emerging roles of the microbiome in cancer, Carcinogenesis source
- Not checked yetcites [54] Arthur, 2012, Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [55] Homburg, 2006, Escherichia coli induces DNA double-strand breaks in eukaryotic cells, Science source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, bacterial derived pyridoxine, a group B vitamin, can stimulate host’s antitumoral immunosurveillance [42].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.2. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Suppressor
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] Aranda, 2015, Immune-dependent antineoplastic effects of cisplatin plus pyridoxine in non-small-cell lung cancer, Oncogene source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the same way, the monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) from Salmonella enterica has been currently used as adjuvant in the vaccine formulation used against anti-cervical carcinoma [41].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.2. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Suppressor
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] Paavonen, 2009, Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): Final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women, Lancet source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, IL-18 KO or IL-18R KO mice are also highly sensitive to colitis-associated CRC [124,125].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] Zaki, 2010, IL-18 production downstream of the NLRP3 inflammasome confers protection against colorectal tumor formation, J. Immunol. source
- Not checked yetcites [125] Salcedo, 2010, MyD88-mediated signaling prevents development of adenocarcinomas of the colon: Role of interleukin 18, J. Exp. Med. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Importantly, the gut microbiome may also influence the outcome of the specific inflammasomes activation [119].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] Kantono, 2017, Inflammasomes and Cancer: The Dynamic Role of the Inflammasome in Tumor Development, Front. Immunol. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They can detect pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms-derived molecules, as well as sterile stressors molecules, via a subset of cytoplasmic pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), called NOD-like Receptors (NLRs) [116].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Levy, 2015, Inflammasomes and the microbiota–partners in the preservation of mucosal homeostasis, Semin. Immunopathol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“LGG is a gut resident bacterium known to have several anti-inflammatory effects within the intestinal microenvironment [88,89,90].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Khailova, 2017, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG treatment improves intestinal permeability and modulates inflammatory response and homeostasis of spleen and colon in experimental model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia, Clin. Nutr. source
- Not checked yetcites [89] Wang, 2017, An LGG-derived protein promotes IgA production through upregulation of APRIL expression in intestinal epithelial cells, Mucosal Immunol. source
- Not checked yetcites [90] Fong, 2016, Immunomodulation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG)-derived soluble factors on antigen-presenting cells of healthy blood donors, Sci. Rep. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On this line, it has been recently observed how LGG attenuates NLRP6-mediated inflammasomes activation in the intestine [113].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] Yu, 2017, Anti-inflammatory capacity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in monophasic variant Salmonella infected piglets is correlated with impeding NLRP6-mediated host inflammatory responses, Vet. Microbiol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Dysregulation of inflammasomes results in a variety of diseases, ranging from autoimmunity to cancer [118].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Zitvogel, 2012, Inflammasomes in carcinogenesis and anticancer immune responses, Nat. Immunol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In those cases, IL-1β is the key player, acting as pro-inflammatory, tumor-promoting trigger [126,127,128,129,130].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [126] McLoed, 2016, Neutrophil-Derived IL-1β Impairs the Efficacy of NF-κB Inhibitors against Lung Cancer, Cell Rep. source
- Not checked yetcites [127] Okamoto, 2010, Constitutively active inflammasome in human melanoma cells mediating autoinflammation via caspase-1 processing and secretion of interleukin-1beta, J. Biol. Chem. source
- Not checked yetcites [128] Zhong, 2016, Germline NLRP1 Mutations Cause Skin Inflammatory and Cancer Susceptibility Syndromes via Inflammasome Activation, Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [129] Kolb, 2016, Obesity-associated NLRC4 inflammasome activation drives breast cancer progression, Nat. Commun. source
- Not checked yetcites [130] Daley, 2017, NLRP3 signaling drives macrophage-induced adaptive immune suppression in pancreatic carcinoma, J. Exp. Med. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Several potential benefits of LGG administration to cancer patients have been foregrounded since long time, by in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies, as recently reviewed by Banna et al. [94].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] Banna, 2017, GG: An Overview to Explore the Rationale of Its Use in Cancer, Front. Pharmacol. source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This could be mediated through the direct modulation of several host’s proliferation pathways, such as mTOR or WNT [107].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [107] Nouri, 2016, Differentially Modulate mTOR and WNT/β-Catenin Pathways in Different Cancer Cell Lines, Iran J. Cancer Prev.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Importantly, among all the stimuli, inflammasomes are also capable of sensing host-microbiota interactions, thus taking an active role in response to commensal and pathogenic bacteria [116].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Levy, 2015, Inflammasomes and the microbiota–partners in the preservation of mucosal homeostasis, Semin. Immunopathol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In fact, treatment with LGG in a rat dimethyl hydrazine-induced colon cancer model, is able to reduce the tumor mass through the modulation of the commensal gut microbiome and the downregulation of pro-inflammatory molecules produced by both gastrointestinal cells and gut-resident immune cells [110].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Gamallat, 2016, Lactobacillus rhamnosus induced epithelial cell apoptosis, ameliorates inflammation and prevents colon cancer development in an animal model, Biomed. Pharmacother. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been demonstrated within several in vitro tumor models (including colorectal, ovary, breast, cervical, hepatic and oral squamous) that LGG is able to exert either anti-proliferative effects or anti-metastatic effects [102,103,104,105,106].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Orlando, 2016, Antiproliferative effects on colon adenocarcinoma cells induced by co-administration of vitamin K1 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Int. J. Oncol. source
- Not checked yetcites [103] Nouri, 2016, Dual Anti-Metastatic and Anti-Proliferative Activity Assessment of Two Probiotics on HeLa and HT-29 Cell Lines, Cell J.
- Not checked yetcites [104] Zhao, 2017, Protective effect of surface layer proteins isolated from four Lactobacillus strains on hydrogen-peroxide-induced HT-29 cells oxidative stress, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. source
- Not checked yetcites [105] Behzadi, 2017, The inhibitory impacts of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-derived extracellular vesicles on the growth of hepatic cancer cells, Microb. Pathog. source
- Not checked yetcites [106] Cheng, 2017, Lactobacillus raises in vitro anticancer effect of geniposide in HSC-3 human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells, Exp. Ther. Med.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“LGG administration can also change gene expression in intestinal porcine epithelial cells and intestine myo-fibroblasts towards an anti-inflammatory profile [114,115].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [114] Taranu, I., Marin, D.E., Braicu, C., Pistol, G.C., Sorescu, I., Pruteanu, L.L., Berindan Neagoe, I., and Vodnar, D.C. (2018). In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of Lactobacilli Strains in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cell Line. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19. source
- Not checked yetcites [115] Uribe, 2018, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG increases COX-2 expression and PGE, Cell. Microbiol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In detail, the inflammasomes complex mediates the activation of caspase-1 which, in turn, triggers the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-18 (IL-18) as well as pyroptosis, a form of programmed cell death [117].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Franchi, 2009, The inflammasome: A caspase-1-activation platform that regulates immune responses and disease pathogenesis, Nat. Immunol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As a direct consequence, without a healthy gut microbiota there is a decreased microbiota-dependent ROS production, thus a less effective chemotherapeutic response [165].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [165] Iida, 2013, Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment, Science source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“If cisplatin is combined with probiotics, such as Lactobacilli, mice show an improved response to therapy.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [166] Gui, 2015, Well-balanced commensal microbiota contributes to anti-cancer response in a lung cancer mouse model, Genet. Mol. Res. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The mechanism behind involves the direct bacterial stimulation of host’s NK cells and macrophages, in turn responsible of a strong antitumoral immune response [157].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [157] Hoesl, 2005, The probiotic approach: An alternative treatment option in urology, Eur. Urol. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Another widely used anti-cancer molecule, cyclophosphamide, coupled with oral bacterial administration (Lactobacillus johonsoni and Enterococcus hirae), leads to the conversion of T cells from naïve to pro-inflammatory T helper 17 (TH17), with the final effect of improving cyclophosphamide efficacy in tumor-bearing mice [167,168].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [167] Viaud, 2013, The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [168] Waldschmitt, 2016, Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis Facilitate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Therapeutic Immunomodulatory Effects, Immunity source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, it has been observed that the intradermal injection of Mycobacterium obuense in melanoma and in pancreatic ductal carcinoma activates antitumoral immune response, acting on host’s antigen presenting cells (APCs) and cytotoxic T cells [159,160].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [159] Stebbing, 2012, An intra-patient placebo-controlled phase I trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intradermal IMM-101 in melanoma, Ann. Oncol. source
- Not checked yetcites [160] Dalgleish, 2016, Randomised, open-label, phase II study of gemcitabine with and without IMM-101 for advanced pancreatic cancer, Br. J. Cancer source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Commensal bacteria and their bioproducts induce inflammasomes activation and IL-18 production in the gut, which, in turn, prevents intestinal barrier disruption and dysbiosis [121,124,131,132,133].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [121] Allen, 2010, The NLRP3 inflammasome functions as a negative regulator of tumorigenesis during colitis-associated cancer, J. Exp. Med. source
- Not checked yetcites [124] Zaki, 2010, IL-18 production downstream of the NLRP3 inflammasome confers protection against colorectal tumor formation, J. Immunol. source
- Not checked yetcites [131] Chen, 2011, A functional role for NLRP6 in intestinal inflammation and tumorigenesis, J. Immunol. source
- Not checked yetcites [132] Williams, 2015, The NLRP1 inflammasome attenuates colitis and colitis-associated tumorigenesis, J. Immunol. source
- Not checked yetcites [133] Zaki, 2010, The NLRP3 inflammasome protects against loss of epithelial integrity and mortality during experimental colitis, Immunity source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dysbiosis has been observed in mice deficient for inflammasomes components, including NLRP6, ASC, caspase-1, and IL-18 [131,132,133,134].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Chen, 2011, A functional role for NLRP6 in intestinal inflammation and tumorigenesis, J. Immunol. source
- Not checked yetcites [132] Williams, 2015, The NLRP1 inflammasome attenuates colitis and colitis-associated tumorigenesis, J. Immunol. source
- Not checked yetcites [133] Zaki, 2010, The NLRP3 inflammasome protects against loss of epithelial integrity and mortality during experimental colitis, Immunity source
- Not checked yetcites [134] Elinav, 2012, Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity, Nature source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On their side, tumor cells, thanks to their genetic instability, constantly evolve novel strategies to escape from such immunosurveillance and expand within the host [147].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [147] Thorsson, 2018, The Immune Landscape of Cancer, Immunity source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It has been observed that the bacteria, by inducing a local immune response, helped to reduce the relapse of the tumor [155].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [155] Zbar, 1970, Tumor immunity produced by the intradermal inoculation of living tumor cells and living Mycobacterium bovis (strain BCG), Science source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although these results are encouraging, many clinical trials are currently ongoing in order to ameliorate the patients’ clinical outcomes, given bacteria-associated toxicity, mainly correlated to their long half-life [163].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [163] Kramer, 2018, Bacterial Therapy of Cancer: Promises, Limitations, and Insights for Future Directions, Front. Microbiol. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“With regard to chemotherapy, it has been reported how tumor-bearing mice, either germ free or having their gut microbiota depleted after antibiotics therapy, do not respond to oxaliplatin drug treatment.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [165] Iida, 2013, Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment, Science source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, it has been discovered how oral administration of Lactobacillus casei decreased superficial bladder cancer recurrence [156].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [156] Aso, 1992, Prophylactic effect of a Lactobacillus casei preparation on the recurrence of superficial bladder cancer. BLP Study Group, Urol. Int. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Given the multiplicity of effects that gut microbiome may play on the host’s immune system, it is not surprising that emerging studies strongly linked the patients’ microbiome composition with the intrinsic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors-based immunotherapy, in the treatments of different solid tumors [170,171,172].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Routy, 2018, Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [171] Gopalakrishnan, 2018, Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [172] Matson, 2018, The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients, Science source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In parallel, Gopalakrishnan et al. [171] demonstrated through metagenomics analysis of melanoma patients’ fecal samples that the anti-PD1 responders’ microbiome was different in composition compared with that of non-responders.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Gopalakrishnan, 2018, Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients, Science source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The authors found that this probiotic was able to downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines in treated patients, although with lacking effects on the post-operative infection rates [99].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [99] Consoli, 2016, Randomized Clinical Trial: Impact of Oral Administration of Saccharomyces boulardii on Gene Expression of Intestinal Cytokines in Patients Undergoing Colon Resection, JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In line with this observation, it has been seen that patients treated with anti-CTLA4 antibody, toxic side effects are mediated by an increased abundance of Firmicutes, such as Faecalisbacterium, and a decreased abundance of Bacterioides [178,179].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Chaput, 2017, Baseline gut microbiota predicts clinical response and colitis in metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab, Ann. Oncol. source
- Not checked yetcites [179] Frankel, 2017, Metagenomic Shotgun Sequencing and Unbiased Metabolomic Profiling Identify Specific Human Gut Microbiota and Metabolites Associated with Immune Checkpoint Therapy Efficacy in Melanoma Patients, Neoplasia source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The authors found that this probiotic was able to downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines in treated patients, although with lacking effects on the post-operative infection rates [99].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [99] Consoli, 2016, Randomized Clinical Trial: Impact of Oral Administration of Saccharomyces boulardii on Gene Expression of Intestinal Cytokines in Patients Undergoing Colon Resection, JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Subsequently, in 2014, a randomized double-blind controlled trial assessed the beneficial administration of the probiotics Bifilact (Lactobacillus acidophilus LAC361 and Bifidobacterium longum BB536) on significantly reducing moderate and severe treatment-induced diarrhea during pelvic radiation [96].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] Demers, 2014, A randomized double-blind controlled trial: Impact of probiotics on diarrhea in patients treated with pelvic radiation, Clin. Nutr. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several preclinical studies and clinical trials share the common goal of evaluating the overall efficacy of probiotics in decreasing the risk and the severity of such anti-cancer treatments related-toxicity, mainly diarrhea and mucositis [187,188].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Vetizou et al. demonstrated that the efficacy of anti-CTLA4 antibodies in reducing sarcoma tumor growth in mice is significantly increased when the gut microbiome is enriched in Bacteroides fragilis and Burkholderia cepacia [175].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [175] Pitt, 2015, Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota, Science source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In particular, Routy et al. [170] found that melanoma patients treated with antibiotics along with the anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy had a lower survival rate.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Routy, 2018, Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors, Science source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In 2016, another double-blind, randomized trial demonstrated that the administration of a combination of prebiotics and probiotics to patients subjected to CRC resection may alleviate irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), often following the operation [98].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Theodoropoulos, 2016, Synbiotics and gastrointestinal function-related quality of life after elective colorectal cancer resection, Ann. Gastroenterol.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Anti-PD1 responders were enriched in two phyla (Akkermansia and Alistipes).”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Routy, 2018, Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors, Science source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Along the same line, Matson et al. [172] performed a metagenomics characterization of stools samples from melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, further corroborating the finding that responders showed a different microbiome compared to those not responding to therapy.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [172] Matson, 2018, The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients, Science source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The same year a randomized clinical trial with CRC patients demonstrated that the perioperative administration of a mixture of prebiotics and probiotics, significantly reduced postoperative infection rates in patients with CRC [101].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [101] Flesch, 2017, Perioperative synbiotics administration decreases postoperative infections in patients with colorectal cancer: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial, Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Multiple translational studies, published in 2018, further support the pivotal role of the gut microbiome in modulating the response to immune checkpoint blockade [170,171,172].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Routy, 2018, Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [171] Gopalakrishnan, 2018, Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [172] Matson, 2018, The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients, Science source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In animals, oral gavage of Bacterioides fragilis and Burkholderia cepacia demonstrated an amelioration of such immunotherapy-associated toxic side effects [175].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [175] Pitt, 2015, Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota, Science source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In 2010, it was assessed for the first time the interaction between probiotic administration, variation of gut microbiota composition, and regulation of intestinal immune-functions in cancer patients undergoing colorectal resection [95].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Gianotti, 2010, A randomized double-blind trial on perioperative administration of probiotics in colorectal cancer patients, World J. Gastroenterol. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They identified and functionally proven in vivo the importance of Bifidobacterium longum, Enterococcus faecium and Collinsella aerofaciens in ameliorating anti-PD-L1 efficacy [172].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [172] Matson, 2018, The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients, Science source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, the heterogenous patients’ microbiome can either be detrimental or beneficial to tumor progression and therapy, depending on its composition and prevailing species.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Each individual inherits a specific gut microbiota footprint since birth, and their intestinal microbiota develops and changes with aging, diet, and lifetime exposure to the heterogeneous environment.
In the paper
“On the same line, Sivan et al., found that the efficacy of PD-L1 targeting-antibody in the cure of melanoma in mice is improved in the presence of gut microbiome enriched in Bifidobacterium species [176].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [176] Sivan, 2015, Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy, Science source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such treatments may cause diverse and even drastic side effects in patients [180,181,182,183,184,185,186].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [180] Bajic, 2018, From the Bottom-Up: Chemotherapy and Gut-Brain Axis Dysregulation, Front. Behav. Neurosci. source
- Not checked yetcites [181] Scaife, 2015, Exploiting biological and physical determinants of radiotherapy toxicity to individualize treatment, Br. J. Radiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [182] Griggs, 1998, Reducing the toxicity of anticancer therapy: New strategies, Leuk. Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [183] Samaan, 2018, Gastrointestinal toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: From mechanisms to management, Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. source
- Not checked yetcites [184] Dong, 2018, Cardiotoxicity of Anticancer Therapeutics, Front. Cardiovasc. Med. source
- Not checked yetcites [185] Shahid, 2018, Cisplatin-induced gastrointestinal toxicity: An update on possible mechanisms and on available gastroprotective strategies, Eur. J. Pharmacol. source
- Not checked yetcites [186] Lawrie, 2018, Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic cancers, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The authors observed in patient’s gut microbiome an increase in the abundance of Clostridiales, Ruminococcaceae and Faecalibacteriae.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Gopalakrishnan, 2018, Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients, Science source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In line with that observation, this year have witnessed novel breakthrough studies on the association between probiotics and anti-cancer therapy efficacy, as three parallel studies identified specific gut species populating the gastro-intestinal tract of cancer immunotherapy responders, able to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy treatments.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, FMT has been used in a Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation [197].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.3. Use of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [197] Kakihana, 2016, Fecal microbiota transplantation for patients with steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut, Blood source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the observed functions as anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer agent in both cellular and animal models, this probiotic may be suggested to be further characterized as adjuvant in integrated anti-cancer therapies in the future.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the success of FMT, there is still a lack of control in this procedure because the whole gut microbiota is transferred along with the therapeutic bacteria species.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.3. Use of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Oncology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genetics, together with functional studies, highlighted a dual role played by the gut microbiome in cancer.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 47
- Probably not a substantial claim. 18
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Because almost every available anti-cancer treatment is toxic also towards normal cells, their use may be coupled with side effects, some of which can compromise the overall survival of the patients [140].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [140] Dy, 2013, Understanding, recognizing, and managing toxicities of targeted anticancer therapies, CA Cancer J. Clin. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports adverse effects, treatment discontinuation and toxic deaths associated with targeted anticancer agents, and the Hematologic section describes toxicity affecting normal blood-cell precursors. These passages support the possibility of serious harm, but the paper focuses on targeted therapies and does not establish that almost every available anticancer treatment is toxic to normal cells. (LLM, conf=0.87)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“NLRP6 KO mice show dysbiosis and increased incidence of inflammation-associated CRC [135,136,137].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [135] Elinav, 2011, NLRP6 inflammasome regulates colonic microbial ecology and risk for colitis, Cell sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports altered, colitogenic microbiota in NLRP6-deficient mice, supporting the dysbiosis part of the claim. The Results report more severe colitis, but the passages found do not report an increased incidence of inflammation-associated colorectal cancer in these mice; a Discussion mention of tumorigenesis concerns NLRC4 instead. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [136] Levy, 2015, Microbiota-Modulated Metabolites Shape the Intestinal Microenvironment by Regulating NLRP6 Inflammasome Signaling, Cell sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports dysbiosis in Nlrp6−/− mice. The Introduction links inflammasome deficiency to a context-specific propensity for inflammation-induced colorectal cancer, but it does not establish the claim’s unqualified increase in cancer incidence. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked yetcites [137] Levy, 2017, NLRP6: A Multifaceted Innate Immune Sensor, Trends Immunol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“Any imbalance in this delicate equilibrium may lead to an impaired microbiota, condition called dysbiosis, linked with several human pathologies, including cancer [13].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Carding, 2015, Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease, Microb. Ecol. Health Dis.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The gut microbiota performs a number of vital functions, including production of vitamins, metabolization of dietary compounds, protection against the expansion and systemic infiltration of gut pathogens [10,11,12].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Vaishnava, 2008, Paneth cells directly sense gut commensals and maintain homeostasis at the intestinal host-microbial interface, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Belkaid, 2013, Compartmentalized and systemic control of tissue immunity by commensals, Nat. Immunol. source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Ravcheev, 2015, Systematic genome assessment of B-vitamin biosynthesis suggests co-operation among gut microbes, Front. Genet.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Among a 1000 of different bacterial species within the gut microbiota, the highly represented ones are the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla [9].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Greenhalgh, 2016, The human gut microbiome in health: Establishment and resilience of microbiota over a lifetime, Environ. Microbiol. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For example, the exposure to infectious agents, UV radiation and toxic substances, individual diet and lifestyle, strongly influences cancer rise, although the risk mainly depends on the dose, the duration and the combination of such injuries, coupled with the individual genetic background [5].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Anand, 2008, Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes, Pharm. Res. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Importantly, the gastro-intestinal entero-endocrine cells secrete over 30 different peptide hormones, involved in several functions, such as gastro-intestinal motility, digestive functions and neuromodulation [28].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Ceranowicz, 2015, Peptidyl hormones of endocrine cells origin in the gut—Their discovery and physiological relevance, J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cancer formation is the result of the stochastic intracellular accumulation of spontaneous mutations during DNA replication, combined with the environment exposure and lifestyle habits, both able to significantly influence cancer risk [3,4].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a consequence, cancer development may alter the microbiome and, in turn, microbiome changes may affect cancer progression [24].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Zitvogel, 2017, Anticancer effects of the microbiome and its products, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The gut microbiome, defined as the whole genome of the host’s gut microbiota, encodes 100-fold more genes than the human genome [14].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Grice, 2012, The human microbiome: Our second genome, Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, it has been widely studied that the gut microbiota may produce or transform molecules affecting several aspects of human health, including: host’s metabolism modulation, gut barrier integrity maintenance, xenobiotics and drug metabolism, protection against gastro-intestinal pathogens and host’s immune system modulation [31,32,33,34].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Gensollen, 2016, How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Schmidt, 2018, The Human Gut Microbiome: From Association to Modulation, Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [33] Bultman, 2014, Emerging roles of the microbiome in cancer, Carcinogenesis source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Cani, 2018, Human gut microbiome: Hopes, threats and promises, Gut source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“With regards to the host’s metabolism, it is known that certain commensal bacteria produce essential micronutrients, such as vitamin K and various components of vitamin B.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Mohajeri, 2018, The role of the microbiome for human health: From basic science to clinical applications, Eur. J. Nutr. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The gut is bidirectionally connected with the nervous system through the so-called “gut-brain axis” (GBA), which includes the central nervous system (CNS), the autonomic nervous system (ANS), the enteric nervous system (ENS), the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and the entero-endocrine system (EES).”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Carabotti, 2015, The gut-brain axis: Interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems, Ann. Gastroenterol.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Also, members of the Bacterioides family are able to synthetize the anti-diabetic compound linoleic acid, to catabolize secondary bile acids and to break down phenolic compounds.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.1. Gut Microbiota and Host Crosstalk
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Mohajeri, 2018, The role of the microbiome for human health: From basic science to clinical applications, Eur. J. Nutr. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, the widely studied bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a major component of the outer membrane in gram-negative bacteria, activates the host’s cell surface receptor toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), belonging to the family of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), thus activating immune T cell-mediated response against cancer cells [40].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.2. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Suppressor
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Paulos, 2007, Microbial translocation augments the function of adoptively transferred self/tumor-specific CD8+ T cells via TLR4 signaling, J. Clin. Investig. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Microbial pathogens are known to drive the 20% of tumorigenesis and a larger number of malignancies are associated with microbial commensal imbalance, or dysbiosis [53].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Bhatt, 2017, The role of the microbiome in cancer development and therapy, CA Cancer J. Clin. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Enterococcus faecalis produces extracellular superoxide and derivative oxygen species is capable to diffuse into host’s cells. In turn, the increase in the oxidative milieu enhances the possibility of host’s cellular DNA mutations [79].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [79] Huycke, 2001, Extracellular superoxide production by Enterococcus faecalis requires demethylmenaquinone and is attenuated by functional terminal quinol oxidases, Mol. Microbiol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been also reported in several studies that Lactobacilli may stimulate host’s immune cells such as NK cells or dendritic cells (DC) or TH1 response, which, in turn, leads to the elimination of cancerous or precancerous cells, although the exact bacterial bioproduct mediating such stimulatory effect still needs to be identified [45,46,47,48].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.2. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Suppressor
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Lenoir, 2016, Lactobacillus casei BL23 regulates Treg and Th17 T-cell populations and reduces DMH-associated colorectal cancer, J. Gastroenterol. source
- Not checked yetcites [46] Lee, 2004, Immunomodulatory and antitumor effects in vivo by the cytoplasmic fraction of Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum, J. Vet. Sci. source
- Not checked yetcites [47] Baldwin, 2010, Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and L. casei mix sensitize colorectal tumoral cells to 5-fluorouracil-induced apoptosis, Nutr. Cancer source
- Not checked yetcites [48] Takagi, 2008, Relationship between the in vitro response of dendritic cells to Lactobacillus and prevention of tumorigenesis in the mouse, J. Gastroenterol. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, Fusobacterium nucleatum inhibits for its own advantage host’s Natural Killer (NK) cells, in order to recruit at the site of the infection myeloid suppressor cells, therefore indirectly helping cancer genesis.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Gur, 2015, Binding of the Fap2 protein of Fusobacterium nucleatum to human inhibitory receptor TIGIT protects tumors from immune cell attack, Immunity source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, the very same anti-cancer treatment might shape the patient’s microbiome and, at the same time, host’s specific microbiome can deeply affect patient’s response to therapy [19].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Gopalakrishnan, 2018, The Influence of the Gut Microbiome on Cancer, Immunity, and Cancer Immunotherapy, Cancer Cell source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In particular, CagA from Helicobacter pylori can bind many host’s proteins intracellularly, including the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2. CagA-SHP-2 complex formation deregulates the phosphatase activity of SHP-2, which, in turn, promotes Ras/MAPK signaling activation [73].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Matozaki, 2009, Protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2: A proto-oncogene product that promotes Ras activation, Cancer Sci. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Accordingly, this augmented intake of estrogen hormones is linked with an increased risk of developing breast cancer, supporting the finding that the gut microbiota composition of women with breast cancer differs from that from healthy controls, and suggesting that several gut bacteria, which could be over-expressed during dysbiosis, may be linked with breast cancer development [83].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 2. Gut Microbiota and Host’s Tumorigenesis > 2.3. Gut Microbiota as a Tumor-Promoter
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Fernández, M.F., Reina-Pérez, I., Astorga, J.M., Rodríguez-Carrillo, A., Plaza-Díaz, J., and Fontana, L. (2018). Breast Cancer and Its Relationship with the Microbiota. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In animal models, LGG administered with food attenuates 5-FU-mediated as well as radiation-mediated gut epithelial injury, therefore helping the preservation of the gut microbiota balance and the intestinal epithelial barrier functionality [91,92,93].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Chang, 2018, Variety, Front. Microbiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [92] Riehl, T.E., Alvarado, D., Ee, X., Zuckerman, A., Foster, L., Kapoor, V., Thotala, D., Ciorba, M.A., and Stenson, W.F. (2018). GG protects the intestinal epithelium from radiation injury through release of lipoteichoic acid, macrophage activation and the migration of mesenchymal stem cells. Gut. source
- Not checked yetcites [93] Zhang, 2017, GG Affects Microbiota and Suppresses Autophagy in the Intestines of Pigs Challenged with, Front. Microbiol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, LGG prevents polyps’ formation in a colorectal APC/min mouse cancer model, and reduces colitis-associated cancer in mice [108,109].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [108] Ni, 2017, A metagenomic study of the preventive effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on intestinal polyp formation in APC, J. Appl. Microbiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [109] Mendes, 2018, Microbiota modification by probiotic supplementation reduces colitis associated colon cancer in mice, World J. Gastroenterol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, host’s DC exposed to LGG induce TH1 immune cells polarization and, in turn, antitumor immune-response potentiation [111].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [111] Cai, 2016, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Activation of Dendritic Cells and Neutrophils Depends on the Dose and Time of Exposure, J. Immunol. Res. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The gut microbial population plays a key role in training, functioning and stimulating the host immune system, with the final effect of developing tolerance towards beneficial microbiota and eliciting immune response against gut pathogens [76].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [76] Belkaid, 2014, Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation, Cell source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“LGG triggers the immune response also within the normal not transformed gut epithelium, thus protecting towards inflammation, which can support the formation of a cancer-favorable milieu [112].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [112] Suzuki, C., Aoki-Yoshida, A., Aoki, R., Sasaki, K., Takayama, Y., and Mizumachi, K. (2017). The distinct effects of orally administered Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis C59 on gene expression in the murine small intestine. PLoS ONE, 12. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Among these probiotic species, LGG is one of the first studied specifically in oncology [87].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 3. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Probiotic Model in Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Goldin, 1996, The effect of Lactobacillus GG on the initiation and promotion of DMH-induced intestinal tumors in the rat, Nutr. Cancer source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The mechanism involves the induction of pro-apoptotic genes within the tumor mass and the enhancement of host’s immune response [166].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [166] Gui, 2015, Well-balanced commensal microbiota contributes to anti-cancer response in a lung cancer mouse model, Genet. Mol. Res. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“With reference to immunotherapy, the administration of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides, synthetic molecules mimicking bacterial DNA, strongly stimulate the immune system, therefore showing anti-tumor activity in several cancers [169].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [169] Weiner, 2008, CpG oligodeoxynucleotides as immunotherapy in cancer, Update Cancer Ther. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Specifically, interventions on microbiome may be pivotal to ameliorate anti-cancer therapy-related toxicity, as well as to improve anti-cancer therapy efficacy [151,152].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These two effects combined together may explain the strong involvement of the patient’s microbiome composition in affecting the efficacy of both chemotherapy and immunotherapy [19].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Gopalakrishnan, 2018, The Influence of the Gut Microbiome on Cancer, Immunity, and Cancer Immunotherapy, Cancer Cell source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The microbiota, when affected by dysbiosis, can deeply influence both cancer pathogenesis (as reported in Section 2) and its therapeutic outcome.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Along this line, the intra-tumoral injection of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides administered together with an anti-interleukin-10 receptor (IL-10R) antibody, induce TNF production from tumor infiltrating myeloid cells and, in turn, reduce the growth several types of tumors in mice [165].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [165] Iida, 2013, Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment, Science source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Back in 1890 two heat-inactivated microorganisms (Streptococci) were injected intratumorally for the very first time in humans as an attempt to cure cancer [153,154].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [153] McCarthy, 2006, The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, IOWA Orthop. J.
- Not checked yetcites [154] Nauts, 1946, The treatment of malignant tumors by bacterial toxins as developed by the late William B. Coley, M.D., reviewed in the light of modern research, Cancer Res.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In particular, the regulation of such therapeutic outcome is tightly connected with the ability of the gut microbiota to metabolize anti-tumoral compounds, as well as to modulate host’s immune response and inflammation pathways [164].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [164] Schwabe, 2013, The microbiome and cancer, Nat. Rev. Cancer source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Consistently, mice bearing lung tumors treated with cisplatin coupled with antibiotics, survive less and develop bigger tumors.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [166] Gui, 2015, Well-balanced commensal microbiota contributes to anti-cancer response in a lung cancer mouse model, Genet. Mol. Res. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In fact, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy treatments can all modify patients’ microbiome and, at the same time, microbiome composition can deeply affect patients’ response to such therapies [150].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [150] Roy, 2017, Microbiota: A key orchestrator of cancer therapy, Nat. Rev. Cancer source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Regarding the correlation between inflammasomes, microbiome and cancer, NRPL6 plays a key role in colorectal carcinogenesis and, in particular, NLRP6 regulates susceptibility to intestinal inflammation through its microbiome-modulatory activity [139].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [139] Elinav, 2018, NLRP6 and Dysbiosis: Avoiding the Luring Attraction of Over-Simplification, Immunity source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In CRC inflammasomes activation has a protective role, on the contrary in breast and skin cancers their triggering leads to detrimental outcomes [119].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 4. Gut Microbiota and the Inflammasomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] Kantono, 2017, Inflammasomes and Cancer: The Dynamic Role of the Inflammasome in Tumor Development, Front. Immunol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Importantly, this intra-tumoral variety is tightly linked with the development of the resistance to therapy, considered the first cause of failure of the available anti-cancer treatments, as well as subsequent tumor relapses [146].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [146] McGranahan, 2015, Biological and therapeutic impact of intratumor heterogeneity in cancer evolution, Cancer Cell source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although the immune checkpoint inhibitors have success in treating various malignancies, there is still a significant number of patients that can use such therapy only for a limited amount of time, given the occurrence of strong toxic side effects, including gut inflammation, due to the subsequent immune-dysregulation (i.e., autoimmunity) [177].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [177] Larkin, 2015, Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma, N. Engl. J. Med. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A mixture of two probiotic species Bifidobacterium longum (BB536) and Lactobacillus johnsonii (La1) was administered to the patients in the double-blind study, finding that one of that, La1, was able to adhere to the colonic mucosa, thereby reducing the concentration of gut pathogens and modulating the local immunity [95].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Gianotti, 2010, A randomized double-blind trial on perioperative administration of probiotics in colorectal cancer patients, World J. Gastroenterol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Functional studies performed with FMT in germ free mice further demonstrated how treating mice with the identified bacteria, along with the anti-PD1 therapy, enhanced the anti-cancer effects and reduces the melanoma growth [171].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Gopalakrishnan, 2018, Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients, Science source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Immune checkpoint inhibition consists in the administration of therapeutic agents able to block the immune-inhibitory pathway, thus modulating T cell activation against tumor target cells.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [173] Chen, 2018, Delivery Strategies for Immune Checkpoint Blockade, Adv. Healthc. Mater. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Performing FMT from patients to germ free mice, the authors found that Akkermansia muciniphila (alone or in combination with Enterococcus hirae) was able to increase intra-tumoral cytotoxic T cell infiltrates, thus increasing the PD-1 blockade response in mice [170].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Routy, 2018, Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors, Science source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, the administration of a specific bacteria, Alistipes shahii, to antibiotic-treated tumor bearing mice, restores TNF production with a notable improvement in the therapeutic outcome [165].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [165] Iida, 2013, Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment, Science source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, according to the result of a trial published in 2017, the randomized administration of Bifidobacterium lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus to CRC patients, can change the epigenetic patterns of tumor tissue from its baseline, with potential therapeutic benefits in CRC by manipulation of the gut microbiota [100].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] Hibberd, 2017, Intestinal microbiota is altered in patients with colon cancer and modified by probiotic intervention, BMJ Open Gastroenterol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“probiotics containing Lactobacillus species are suggested be used to prevent diarrhea in patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for a pelvic malignancy (Level of evidence III) [193,194].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [193] Peterson, 2015, Management of oral and gastrointestinal mucosal injury: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, Ann. Oncol. source
- Not checked yetcites [194] Lalla, 2014, MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy, Cancer source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although probiotics are generally regarded as safe, the main concerns of administering them to immunocompromised cancer patients are both the potential risk of opportunistic infection development and the transfer of antibiotics resistance [190,191].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While CTLA-4 regulates T cells proliferation early in the immune response within the lymph nodes, PD-1 suppresses T-cell activation later, within the body periphery [174].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [174] Buchbinder, 2016, CTLA-4 and PD-1 Pathways: Similarities, Differences, and Implications of Their Inhibition, Am. J. Clin. Oncol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In fact, they demonstrated that oral administration of a cocktail of Bifidobacterium species combined with the anti-PD-L1 antibody, specifically boosts T cell response and blocks the melanoma growth [176].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [176] Sivan, 2015, Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy, Science source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Despite of that, probiotics administration in multiple trials has shown beneficial effects on ameliorating diarrhea and other gut-related damages following anti-cancer therapy, thus re-establishing a healthy intestinal microbiota composition [192].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.2. Use of Probiotics in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [192] Mego, 2013, Probiotic bacteria in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy, Complement. Ther. Med. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Importantly, metagenomics analysis of patients’ fecal gut microbiome showed a difference in the composition of their gut microbiome.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Routy, 2018, Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors, Science source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Altogether, these data provide a strong evidence of the role of gut microbiota composition in modulating the effect of both immunotherapy response and toxicity.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“LGG is a very good example of a probiotic well studied in cancer, often administered as complementary therapeutic to cure dysbiosis.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even if the last decade witnessed massive advances in unveiling the role of gut microbiome in cancer and other diseases, there are still many obstacles for translating basic microbiome research into therapeutic applications.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.1. Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Enhance Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Efficacy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Potential pathogens can develop among gut bacteria and could limit or slow down the translation of in vitro and in vivo results to the clinic.
In the paper
“Regarding anti-tumor therapeutic applications, preclinical studies performed in mice demonstrated the efficacy of FMT in reducing colon tumorigenesis, although the efficacy in clinical trials still needs to be further proven [198].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.3. Use of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [198] Bel, 2014, Reprogrammed and transmissible intestinal microbiota confer diminished susceptibility to induced colitis in TMF−/− mice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, FMT has been used to cure recurrent Clostridium difficile duodenal infection [195,196].”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 5. Gut Microbiota and Anti-Cancer Therapy > 5.3. Use of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [195] Dijkgraaf, 2013, Duodenal infusion of feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile, N. Engl. J. Med.
- Not checked yetcites [196] Khoruts, 2016, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Affects the Outcome of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection, Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some bacterial subpopulations are able to rise during gut dysbiosis and, in turn, to trigger the formation of an inflammatory and pro-cancerogenic environment.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the other hand, many gut derived probiotics are able to protect the host, re-establishing the conditions of a healthy intestinal microbiota within dysbiotic patients, including cancer patients.”
§ Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy > 6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
The gut microbial balance is required for the correct fulfilment of the gut microbiota's metabolic functions.
“The gut microbial balance has a key role in the correct fulfilment of all these pivotal metabolic functions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Potential pathogens can develop among gut bacteria and could limit or slow down the translation of in vitro and in vivo results to the clinic.
“Among the gut bacteria can develop potential pathogens and that could limit, or at least slow down, the translation of the in vitro and in vivo results to the clinic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Each individual inherits a specific gut microbiota footprint since birth, and their intestinal microbiota develops and changes with aging, diet, and lifetime exposure to the heterogeneous environment.
“Each individual inherited a specific gut microbiota footprint since their birth, and their intestinal microbiota develops and changes with aging, diet and lifetime exposure to the heterogeneous environment.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, depending on various factors, the gut microbiome can lead to either tumorigenesis or tumor regression [420, 421].”
From Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression (2023) · cites this paper as [420]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Lenoir, M., del Carmen, S., Cortes-Perez, N. G., Lozano-Ojalvo, D., Muñoz-Provencio, D., Chain, F., Langella, P., de Moreno de LeBlanc, A., LeBlanc, J. G., & Bermúdez-Humarán, L. G. (2016) · Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1007/s00535-015-1158-9 · Cited by 155
RetractedCombined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma
Larkin, J., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Gonzalez, R., Grob, J. J., Cowey, C. L., Lao, C. D., Schadendorf, D., Dummer, R., Smylie, M., Rutkowski, P., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504030 · Cited by 8,157
Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235122 · Cited by 7,863
Wang, H., Naghavi, M., Allen, C., Barber, R. M., Bhutta, Z. A., Carter, A., Casey, D. C., Charlson, F. J., Chen, A. Z., Coates, M. M., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31012-1 · Cited by 6,596
Fitzmaurice, C., Allen, C., Barber, R. M., Barregård, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Brenner, H., Dicker, D., Chimed‐Ochir, O., Dandona, R., Dandona, L., et al. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688 · Cited by 6,318
The Immune Landscape of Cancer
Thorsson, V., Gibbs, D. L., Brown, S. D., Wolf, D., Bortone, D. S., Ou Yang, T.-H., Porta-Pardo, E., Gao, G. F., Plaisier, C. L., Eddy, J. A., et al. (2018) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.023 · Cited by 5,870
Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors
Routy, B., Le Chatelier, E., Derosa, L., Duong, C. P. M., Alou, M. T., Daillère, R., Fluckiger, A., Messaoudene, M., Rauber, C., Roberti, M. P., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan3706 · Cited by 5,671
Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation.
Belkaid, Y., & Hand, T. W. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011 · Cited by 5,385
Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients
Gopalakrishnan, V., Spencer, C. N., Nezi, L., Reuben, A., Andrews, M. C., Karpinets, T. V., Prieto, P. A., Vicente, D., Hoffman, K., Wei, S. C., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan4236 · Cited by 4,812 · cited 2×
“[171] demonstrated through metagenomics analysis of melanoma patients’ fecal samples that the anti-PD1 responders’ microbiome was different in composition compared with that of non-responders.”
BackgroundResultCommensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti–PD-L1 efficacy
Sivan, A., Corrales, L., Hubert, N., Williams, J. B., Aquino-Michaels, K., Earley, Z. M., Benyamin, F. W., Man Lei, Y., Jabri, B., Alegre, M.-L., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac4255 · Cited by 3,888 · cited 3×
“In fact, they demonstrated that oral administration of a cocktail of Bifidobacterium species combined with the anti-PD-L1 antibody, specifically boosts T cell response and blocks the melanoma growth [176].”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parker, B. J., Wearsch, P. A., Veloo, A. C. M., & Rodriguez‐Palacios, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00906 · Cited by 1,771
Gut Bacteroides species in health and disease
Zafar, H., & Saier, M. H. (2021) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2020.1848158 · Cited by 1,303
Deep learning in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection
Tran, K. A., Kondrashova, O., Bradley, A., Williams, E. D., Pearson, J. V., & Waddell, N. (2021) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-021-00968-x · Cited by 932
Human gut microbiota in health and disease: Unveiling the relationship
Afzaal, M., Saeed, F., Shah, Y. A., Hussain, M., Rabail, R., Socol, C. T., Hassoun, A., Pateiro, M., Lorenzo, J. M., Rusu, A. V., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.999001 · Cited by 762
The Oral Microbiota May Have Influence on Oral Cancer
Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Zheng, H., & Zhang, C. P. (2020) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00476 · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Vivarelli, S., Salemi, R., Candido, S., Falzone, L., Santagati, M., Stefani, S., Torino, F., Banna, G. L., Tonini, G., & Libra, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Catania (IT)
- University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
- Ospedale Cannizzaro (IT)
- Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Libra, Massimo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-01-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38
- ISSN
- 2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6356461
- OpenAlex
- W2906724057
- Semantic Scholar
- d102bbd36de209be8b4873bf86615a75268252ab
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 204
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 37
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Bacterial Cancer Therapy
- Keywords
- gut microbiota, cancer, carcinogenesis, dysbiosis, probiotics, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, cancer immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, intestinal homeostasis, inflammation, microbiota metabolites, host-microbe interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review