Cited by 3Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic diversity and population structureGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Draft Genome Assembly of an Iconic Arctic Species: Muskox (Ovibos moschatus)

Open access
Prewer, Erin, Kutz, Susan, Leclerc, Lisa-Marie, Kyle, Christopher J.·2022·Genes

Abstract

Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) are Arctic species within the Caprinae subfamily that are economically and culturally significant to northern Indigenous communities. Low genetic diversity from repeated genetic bottlenecks, coupled with the effects of Arctic warming (e.g., heat stress, changing forage, pathogen range expansions), present conservation concerns for this species. Reference genome assemblies enhance our ecological and evolutionary understanding of species (which in turn aid conservation efforts). Herein, we provide a full draft reference genome of muskox using Illumina Hiseq data and cross-species scaffolding. The final reference assembly yielded a genome of 2,621,890,883 bp in length, a scaffold N50 of ~13.2 million, and an annotation identifying ~19.3 k genes. The muskox genome assembly and annotation were then used to reconstruct a phylogenetic tree which estimated muskoxen diverged from other ungulate species~12 Mya. To gain insight into the demographic history of muskoxen we also performed pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent (PSMC) that identified two population bottlenecks coinciding with major glaciation events contributing to the notoriously low genetic variation observed in muskoxen. Overall, this genome assembly provides a foundation for future population genomic studies, such as latitudinal analyses, to explore the capacity of muskoxen to adapt to rapidly changing environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/genes13050809

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The previous draft short-read assemblies of the muskox are relatively incomplete and fragmented.

    “While these assemblies provided an important first glimpse of the muskox genome, they are relatively incomplete and fragmented, typical of assemblies derived from short reads.”

    From Chromosomal-level reference genome assembly of muskox (Ovibos moschatus) from Banks Island in the Canadian Arctic, a resource for conservation genomics (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results (§3.1; page unavailable) describe an initial short-read assembly as fragmented, with about 822,000 contigs and 65.6% complete BUSCO genes. But the paper describes its final draft as mainly composed of large scaffolds, with 87.9% complete BUSCO genes; it does not characterize that final assembly as fragmented. The claim applies the characterization more broadly than this source supports. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Bushnell B. BBMap: A Fast, Accurate, Splice-Aware Aligner 2014 Available online: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1241166 (accessed on 11 May 2017)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prewer, E., Kutz, S., Leclerc, L.-M., & Kyle, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Trent University (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Government of Nunavut (CA)
Corresponding author
Prewer, Erin
Venue
Genes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-05-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
809
ISSN
2073-4425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225258176
Cited by
3
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Federal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  • ArcticNet
  • Canada North Outfitting
  • Polar Knowledge Canada
  • Government of Nunavut and the Government
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
Ovibos moschatus, draft genome assembly, genome annotation, phylogenetic divergence, population bottleneck, demographic history, glaciation, genetic diversity, Arctic conservation, Caprinae
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Ruminants, Genome, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review