Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 570

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review

Open access
Sanchez-Sabate, Ruben, Sabaté, Joan·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
DOI 10.3390/ijerph16071220
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Meat consumption is a major contributor to global warming. Given the worldwide growing demand of meat, and the severe impact of meat production on the planet, reducing animal protein consumption is a matter of food security and public health. Changing consumer food behavior is a challenge. Taste preferences, culinary traditions and social norms factor into food choices. Since behavioral change cannot occur without the subject’s positive attitude based on reasons and motivations, a total of 34 papers on consumer attitudes and behavior towards meat consumption in relation to environmental concerns were examined. The results show that consumers aware of the meat impact on the planet, willing to stop or significantly reduce meat consumption for environmental reasons, and who have already changed their meat intake for ecological concerns are a small minority. However, environmental motives are already appealing significant proportions of Westerners to adopt certain meat curtailment strategies. Those who limit meat intake for environmental reasons are typically female, young, simply meat-reducer (not vegan/vegetarian), ecology-oriented, and would more likely live in Europe and Asia than in the U.S.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16071220

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Slingo, 2005, Introduction: Food crops in a changing climate, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 360, 1983, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1755 · DOI
  2. Bouwman, 2013, Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 20882, 10.1073/pnas.1012878108 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Thornton, 2010, Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 365, 2853, 10.1098/rstb.2010.0134 · DOI
  4. Dauvergne, P. (2010). The Shadows of Consumption: Consequences for the Global Environment, MIT Press.
  5. Sabate, 2014, Sustainability of plant-based diets: Back to the future, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 100, 476S, 10.3945/ajcn.113.071522 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., and Viswanath, K. (2008). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Segovia-Siapco, G., and Sabaté, J. (2018). Health and sustainability outcomes of vegetarian dietary patterns: A revisit of the EPIC-Oxford and the Adventist Health Study-2 cohorts. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. · DOI
  8. Ruby, 2012, Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study, Appetite, 58, 141, 10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kessler, 2016, Personality Profiles, Values and Empathy: Differences between Lacto-Ovo-Vegetarians and Vegans, Complement. Med. Res., 23, 95, 10.1159/000445369 · DOI
  10. Beardsworth, 1991, Vegetarianism, Veganism, and Meat Avoidance: Recent Trends and Findings, Br. Food J., 93, 19, 10.1108/00070709110135231 · DOI
  11. Fox, 2008, Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations, Appetite, 50, 422, 10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hussar, 2010, Children who choose not to eat meat: A study of early moral decision-making, Soc. Dev., 19, 627, 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00547.x · DOI
  13. Jabs, 1998, Model of the process of adopting vegetarian diets: Health vegetarians and ethical vegetarians, J. Nutr. Educ., 30, 196, 10.1016/S0022-3182(98)70319-X · DOI
  14. Neale, 1993, Women vegetarians: Lifestyle considerations and attitudes to vegetarianism, Nutr. Food Sci., 93, 24, 10.1108/EUM0000000000979 · DOI
  15. Dagevos, 2013, Sustainability and meat consumption: Is reduction realistic?, Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy, 9, 60
  16. Schosler, 2013, Climate change and meat eating: An inconvenient couple?, J. Environ. Psychol., 33, 1, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.001 · DOI
  17. De Groeve, B., and Bleys, B. (2017). Less Meat Initiatives at Ghent University: Assessing the Support among Students and How to Increase It. Sustainability, 9. · DOI
  18. Pohjolainen, 2016, Consumer consciousness on meat and the environment—Exploring differences, Appetite, 101, 37, 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.012 · DOI
  19. Vanhonacker, 2013, Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices, Appetite, 62, 7, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Graca, 2015, Meat, beyond the plate. Data-driven hypotheses for understanding consumer willingness to adopt a more plant-based diet, Appetite, 90, 80, 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.037 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Cordts, 2014, Consumer Response to Negative Information on Meat Consumption in Germany, Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev., 17, 83
  22. Truelove, 2012, Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors, J. Environ. Psychol., 32, 246, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.002 · DOI
  23. Lea, 2008, Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours, Appetite, 50, 207, 10.1016/j.appet.2005.07.012 · DOI
  24. Clonan, 2015, Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: Impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability, Public Health Nutr., 18, 2446, 10.1017/S1368980015000567 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2015, Food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours among university undergraduates a mixed-methods study, Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 16, 279, 10.1108/IJSHE-06-2013-0071 · DOI
  26. Aiking, 2016, Help the climate, change your diet: A cross-sectional study on how to involve consumers in a transition to a low-carbon society, Appetite, 98, 19, 10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.001 · DOI
  27. Schosler, 2014, “Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges, Appetite, 76, 120, 10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Siegrist, 2015, Factors influencing changes in sustainability perception of various food behaviors: Results of a longitudinal study, Food Qual. Prefer., 46, 33, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.07.006 · DOI
  29. Hunter, 2016, Fear of climate change consequences and predictors of intentions to alter meat consumption, Food Policy, 62, 151, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.06.004 · DOI
  30. Boersema, 2015, Meat and masculinity among young Chinese, Turkish and Dutch adults in the Netherlands, Appetite, 89, 152, 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.013 · DOI
  31. Graca, 2015, Attached to meat? (Un)Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet, Appetite, 95, 113, 10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.024 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Aiking, 2018, Prospects for pro-environmental protein consumption in Europe: Cultural, culinary, economic and psychological factors, Appetite, 121, 29, 10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.042 · DOI
  33. Hoffman, 2013, Differences between health and ethical vegetarians. Strength of conviction, nutrition knowledge, dietary restriction, and duration of adherence, Appetite, 65, 139, 10.1016/j.appet.2013.02.009 · DOI
  34. Dyett, 2013, Vegan lifestyle behaviors. An exploration of congruence with health-related beliefs and assessed health indices, Appetite, 67, 119, 10.1016/j.appet.2013.03.015 · DOI
  35. Moore, 2016, The Interconnectedness of Diet Choice and Distance Running: Results of the Research Understanding the Nutrition of Endurance Runners (RUNNER) Study, Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab., 26, 205, 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0085 · DOI
  36. White, 1999, Vegetarianism among us Women Physicians, J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 99, 595, 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00146-7 · DOI
  37. Pribis, 2010, Beliefs and Attitudes toward Vegetarian Lifestyle across Generations, Nutrients, 2, 523, 10.3390/nu2050523 · DOI
  38. Lindeman, 2001, Food choice ideologies: The modern manifestations of normative and humanist views of the world, Appetite, 37, 175, 10.1006/appe.2001.0437 · DOI
  39. Rozin, 1997, Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: The transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust, Psychol. Sci., 8, 67, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00685.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. Schoesler, 2014, Fostering more sustainable food choices: Can Self-Determination Theory help?, Food Qual. Prefer., 35, 59, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.01.008 · DOI
  41. Verain, 2015, Sustainable food consumption. Product choice or curtailment?, Appetite, 91, 375, 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.055 · DOI
  42. Haverstock, 2012, To eat or not to eat. A comparison of current and former animal product limiters, Appetite, 58, 1030, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.02.048 · DOI
  43. Hudders, 2014, From Meatless Mondays to Meatless Sundays: Motivations for Meat Reduction among Vegetarians and Semi-vegetarians Who Mildly or Significantly Reduce Their Meat Intake, Ecol. Food Nutr., 53, 639, 10.1080/03670244.2014.896797 · DOI
  44. Peneau, S., Fassier, P., Alles, B., Kesse-Guyot, E., Hercberg, S., and Mejean, C. (2017). Dilemma between health and environmental motives when purchasing animal food products: Sociodemographic and nutritional characteristics of consumers. BMC Public Health, 17. · DOI
  45. Izmirli, 2011, The relationship between student consumption of animal products and attitudes to animals in Europe and Asia, Br. Food J., 113, 436, 10.1108/00070701111116482 · DOI
  46. Schoesler, 2017, Towards a reduced meat diet: Mindset and motivation of young vegetarians, low, medium and high meat-eaters, Appetite, 113, 387, 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.007 · DOI
  47. Povey, 2001, Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: An examination of the role of ambivalence, Appetite, 37, 15, 10.1006/appe.2001.0406 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Beardsworth, 1991, Health-related beliefs and dietary practices among vegetarians and vegans: A qualitative study, Health Educ. J., 50, 38, 10.1177/001789699105000111 · DOI
  49. Hartmann, 2017, Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 61, 11, 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Lakoff, 2010, Why it matters how we frame the environment, Environ. Commun., 4, 70, 10.1080/17524030903529749 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Graham, 2017, Communicating the climate impacts of meat consumption: The effect of values and message framing, Glob. Environ. Chang.-Hum. Policy Dimens., 44, 98, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.004 · DOI
  52. Evans, 2014, Considering local adaptation increases willingness to mitigate, Glob. Environ. Chang.-Hum. Policy Dimens., 25, 69, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.013 · DOI
  53. Feinberg, 2011, Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs, Psychol. Sci., 22, 34, 10.1177/0956797610391911 · DOI
  54. Howell, 2014, Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals’ attitudes and behavior, Environ. Behav., 46, 70, 10.1177/0013916512452428 · DOI
  55. Gussow, 1986, Dietary guidelines for sustainability, J. Nutr. Educ., 18, 1, 10.1016/S0022-3182(86)80255-2 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Campbell, 2016, Young people’s perception of the environmental impact of food and their willingness to eat less meat for the sake of the environment: A qualitative study, Proc. Nutr. Soc., 75, E224, 10.1017/S0029665116002391 · DOI
  57. Macdiarmid, 2016, Eating like there’s no tomorrow: Public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet, Appetite, 96, 487, 10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.011 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Poulain, J.-P. (2017). The Sociology of Food: Eating and the Place of Food in Society, Bloomsbury Academic.

Cited by

See all 570

Metadata

Authors
Sanchez-Sabate, R., & Sabaté, J.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-04-05
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
1220
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/ijerph16071220
OpenAlex
W2927349217
Cited by
570
References
4
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.