Cited by 47Sport Psychology and PerformanceWorkplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout Research

Examining the Mental Well-Being of Australian Sport Coaches

Open access
Carson, Fraser, Malakellis, Mary, Walsh, Julia, Main, Luana C., Kremer, Peter·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Background: Research has highlighted the multitude of factors that are negatively associated with coach mental well-being but has failed to investigate how the determinants of mental well-being can affect the coach both positively and negatively. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to investigate levels of mental well-being among sport coaches and assess whether areas of work life—specifically workload and control—are related to levels of mental well-being. Method: An online survey comprising demographic and coaching experience details, the Areas of Work Life Scale (AWS), and the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale was completed by 464 Australian coaches involved in a range of sports. Differences in coach mental well-being according to key demographic and coaching-related subgroups were assessed using separate t-test and ANOVA analyses and the magnitude of effects was determined using Cohen’s d and the eta-squared (ή2) statistics. Multiple linear regression was used to examine relationships between both workload and control and mental well-being after controlling for age, gender, coaching setting and weekly coaching activity. Results: The findings indicate poorer mental well-being among both male and younger coaches and indicate that coach mental well-being is related to the ability to self-manage the workload associated with their role as a coach as well as greater autonomy over coaching-related tasks and activities. Specifically, a one-unit increase in AWS workload and AWS control were associated with ~three- and ~four-unit increases in coach mental well-being, respectively. Conclusion: Greater provision of resources and education is required to assist coaches to manage their own mental well-being, while being supported by the organisation they coach for. Enabling coaches to balance their coaching requirements and to have control over their environment will improve their ability to constantly coach at a high standard.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16234601

Cites

60 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elite-level coaches from Australia reported high levels of mental wellbeing on the WEMWBS.

    “Carson et al. for instance [92] found that elite-level coaches from Australia reported high levels of mental wellbeing on the WEMWBS.”

    From The Mental Health of Elite-Level Coaches: A Systematic Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Results report a mean WEMWBS score of 50.9 and describe generally high well-being among the Australian coaches sampled. But most coached at the community level; although the Discussion reports no well-being difference between community and high-performance coaches, the cited finding is not specifically about elite-level coaches. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Rynne S.B. Mallett C.J. Rabjohns M.W. High performance coaching: Demands and development The Psychology of Coaching: A Contemporary Review Thelwell R. Harwood C. Greenlees I. Routledge London, UK 2017 114 127

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carson, F., Malakellis, M., Walsh, J., Main, L. C., & Kremer, P.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Carson, Fraser
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-11-20
Volume
16
Issue
23
Pages
4601
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2989674273
Cited by
47
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Centre for Sport Research, Deakin University (202102-F002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
sports coaches, workload, perceived control, work life, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, coach gender, coach age, coach support
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Occupational Stress, Adult, Australia, Female, Health Status, Health Status Indicators, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Sports, Workload, Professional Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review