Cited by 285Sport Psychology and PerformanceStress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-being

Psychological stress in sports coaches: A review of concepts, research, and practice

Open access
Fletcher, David, Scott, Michael·2010·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Sports coaches operate within a complex, ever-changing environment that imposes many pressures on them. Here, we address the psychological impact of these demands via a critical review of the literature pertaining to stress in sport coaches. The narrative is divided into three main sections: (1) conceptual and definitional issues, (2) theoretical and empirical issues, and (3) implications for applied practice. The review focuses on the environmental stressors that coaches encounter, their appraisals of and responses to these demands, and the impact this has on their personal well-being and job performance. The influence of various personal and situational characteristics is also discussed. A key message to emerge from this review is that the potential health and performance costs of psychological stress to sports coaches are significant. The rapid rate of change in contemporary sport and the dynamic nature of stress mean that stress in coaches is an ongoing problem that needs to be monitored and addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640410903406208

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous reviews have summarised key concepts around stressors, wellbeing, coping strategies, and burnout among coaches.

    “These studies have summarised key concepts around stressors [21, 22, 35, 36], wellbeing [21, 35, 36], coping strategies [3, 21, 36] and burnout [37].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fletcher, D., & Scott, M.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Fletcher, David
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2009-12-24
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
127-137
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2011652896
Cited by
285
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
psychological stress, sports coaches, occupational stress, stress appraisal, stress response, coach well-being, employee performance, environmental stressors, coach performance
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Sports, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review