Cited by 58Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDigital Mental Health InterventionsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

An enhanced social networking intervention for young people with active suicidal ideation: safety, feasibility and acceptability outcomes

Open access
Bailey, Eleanor, Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario, Robinson, Jo, D’Alfonso, Simon, Nedeljkovic, Maja, Davey, Christopher G., Bendall, Sarah, Gilbertson, Tamsyn +10 more·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Online social networking interventions have potential to support young people who experience suicidal thoughts by specifically addressing interpersonal risk factors for suicide, but may also pose a risk of harm. This uncontrolled, single-group pilot study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of an enhanced online social networking intervention (“Affinity”) among a sample of young people who experienced active suicidal ideation, and to explore potential changes in clinical outcomes and the therapeutic targets of the intervention. Twenty young people with current or recent suicidal ideation who were receiving treatment for depression at a tertiary-level mental health service were given access to Affinity for two months. Participants were assessed at baseline and 8-week follow-up; 90 percent reported clinical suicidal ideation at baseline. A priori criteria related to feasibility, safety and acceptability were satisfied. In terms of potential clinical effects, significant and reliable pre-post improvements were found on self-report outcomes including suicidal ideation. This study provides initial world-first evidence to support the use of an online intervention incorporating social networking as an adjunct to treatment for young people who experience suicidal ideation. The effectiveness of Affinity needs to be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17072435

Cites

49 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media platforms have potential to deliver mental health interventions in low-resource and middle-resource settings, and have been safely used in high-resource settings with appropriate risk management strategies among young people experiencing active suicidal ideation.

    “Social media platforms have similar potential to deliver mental health interventions in low-resource and middleresource settings, 376 and have been safely used in highresource settings with appropriate risk management strategies among young people experiencing active suicidal ideation.”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [377]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [12]Joiner T.E. Why People Die by Suicide Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA, USA 2005
  2. [34]Alvarez-Jimenez M. Rice S. D’Alfonso S. Leicester S. Bendall S. Pryor I. Russon P. McEnery C. Santesteban-Echarri O. Da Costa G. A novel multi-modal online service (MOST+) for help-seeking young people experiencing mental ill-health: A pilot evaluation within a national youth e-mental health service in preparation PMC7453330 32788151
  3. [52]Bowden S.C. Neuropsychological Assessment in the Age of Evidence-based Practice: Diagnostic and Treatment Evaluations Oxford University Press New York, NY, USA 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bailey, E., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Robinson, J., D’Alfonso, S., Nedeljkovic, M., Davey, C. G., Bendall, S., Gilbertson, T., Phillips, J., Bloom, L., Nicholls, L., Garland, N., Cagliarini, D., Phelan, M., McKechnie, B., Mitchell, J., Cooke, M., & Rice, S. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Orygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • Orygen (AU)
Corresponding author
Rice, Simon M.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
2435
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014916758
Cited by
58
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Royal Melbourne Hospital (MEW-01-2017)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
suicidal ideation, youth, affinity, depression, suicide prevention, interpersonal risk factors, intervention safety, feasibility, acceptability, adjunctive therapy
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Suicidal Ideation, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review