Cited by 15Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Brief Psychological Intervention Through Mobile App and Conference Calls for the Prevention of Depression in Non-Professional Caregivers: A Pilot Study

Open access
Otero, Patricia, Hita, Isabel, Torres, Ángela J., Vázquez, Fernando L.·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Despite its potential, no intervention aimed at non-professional caregivers administered through a smartphone app has been proven to prevent depression. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of an indicated depression-prevention intervention for non-professional caregivers administered through an app with the addition of conference-call contact. The intervention was administered to 31 caregivers (Mean age = 54.0 years, 93.5% women). An independent evaluation determined the incidence of depression, depressive symptoms, risk of developing depression, and the variables in the theoretical model (positive environmental reinforcement, negative automatic thoughts) at the pre-intervention and post-intervention, as well as the one- and three-month follow-ups. The incidence of depression at 3 months of follow-up was 6.5%. There was a significant reduction in depressive symptoms (p < 0.001) and in the risk of developing depression (p < 0.001) at the post-intervention and at the one- and three-month follow-ups. The model’s variables improved significantly after the intervention and were associated with post-intervention depressive symptoms. The intervention was more effective in caregivers who had a lower level of depressive symptoms at the pre-intervention. Adherence and satisfaction with the intervention were high. The results encourage future research using a randomized controlled clinical trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17124578

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Institute of Medicine Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research National Academic Press Washington, DC, USA 1994 25144015
  2. [48]Lewinsohn P.M. Hoberman H. Teri L. Hautzinger M. An integrative theory of depression Theoretical Issues in Behaviour Therapy Reiss S. Bootzin R.R. Academic Press New York, NY, USA 1985 313 359

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otero, P., Hita, I., Torres, Á. J., & Vázquez, F. L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade da Coruña (ES)
  • Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Corresponding author
Otero, Patricia
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
4578
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037591789
Cited by
15
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositorio institucional da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (University of Santiago de Compostela) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RUC (Universidade Da Coruña) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (Spain) (PSI2016-79041)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
depression prevention, non-professional caregivers, caregiver burden, smartphone-based intervention, conference calls, brief psychological intervention, depressive symptoms, negative automatic thoughts, intervention adherence, intervention satisfaction
MeSH terms
Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Caregivers, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review