Cited by 26Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children (UP-C) in Portugal: Feasibility Study Results

Open access
Caiado, Brígida, Góis, Ana, Pereira, Bárbara, Canavarro, Maria Cristina, Moreira, Helena·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The Unified Protocol for Children (UP-C) is a transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy group intervention for children and caregivers targeting the treatment of children’s emotional disorders (EDs). The present study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the UP-C in the Portuguese population using a single-armed design. The participants were 32 children (6–12 years of age) with an ED (anxiety and/or depressive disorder) as a main diagnosis and their parents. All participants received the UP-C intervention and were assessed at pretreatment, midtreatment, posttreatment, and 3 months posttreatment. Children, parents, the clinicians, and an external observer completed questionnaires to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the UP-C (e.g., satisfaction, motivation, and adherence). Children and parents also completed self-report measures assessing the children’s anxiety and depression and its interference and severity. The results of the present study support the feasibility and acceptability of the UP-C in Portugal; low dropout rates, high adherence rates, and high levels of child and parent satisfaction and motivation were observed. Moreover, significant reductions over time in children’s levels of anxiety and/or depression and of its interference and severity were found and were maintained after 3 months of follow-up. These results are promising and warrant a subsequent randomized controlled trial (RCT).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph19031782

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Kendall P.C. Chu B.C. Pimentel S.S. Choudhury M. Treating anxiety disorders in youth Child & Adolescent Therapy: Cognitive–Behavioral Procedures 2nd ed. Kendall P.C. Guilford Press New York, NY, USA 2000 235 287
  2. [23]Weisz J.R. Southam-Gerow M.A. Gordis E.B. Connor-Smith J. Primary and secondary control enhancement training for youth depression: Applying the deployment-focused model of treatment development and testing Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents Weisz A.E. The Guilford Press New York, NY, USA 2003 165 182

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caiado, B., Góis, A., Pereira, B., Canavarro, M. C., & Moreira, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua do Colégio Novo, 3030-115 Coimbra, Portugal
  • Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua do Colégio Novo, 3030-115 Coimbra, Portugal
Corresponding author
Caiado, Brígida
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-04
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
1782
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210363057
Cited by
26
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Estudo Geral (Universidad de Coimbra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia ([SFRH/BD/147848/2019])
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy, childhood anxiety, childhood depression, group intervention, feasibility, acceptability, parental involvement, medication adherence, dropout, Portugal
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Portugal, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review