Cited by 369Treatment of Major DepressionPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Personalized Medicine for Depression: Can We Match Patients With Treatments?

Open access
Simon, Gregory E., Perlis, Roy H.·2010·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Response to specific depression treatments varies widely among individuals. Understanding and predicting that variation could have great benefits for people living with depression. METHOD: The authors describe a conceptual model for identifying and evaluating evidence relevant to personalizing treatment for depression. They review evidence related to three specific treatment decisions: choice between antidepressant medication and psychotherapy, selection of a specific antidepressant medication, and selection of a specific psychotherapy. They then discuss potential explanations for negative findings as well as implications for research and clinical practice. RESULTS: Many previous studies have examined general predictors of outcome, but few have examined true moderators (predictors of differential response to alternative treatments). The limited evidence indicates that some specific clinical characteristics may inform the choice between antidepressant medication and psychotherapy and the choice of specific antidepressant medication. Research to date does not identify any biologic or genetic predictors of sufficient clinical utility to inform the choice between medication and psychotherapy, the selection of specific medication, or the selection of a specific psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: While individuals vary widely in response to specific depression treatments, the variability remains largely unpredictable. Future research should focus on identifying true moderator effects and should consider how response to treatments varies across episodes. At this time, our inability to match patients with treatments implies that systematic follow-up assessment and adjustment of treatment are more important than initial treatment selection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09111680

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological treatments benefit men and women to the same extent and are equally suitable for individuals of all ages, levels of education, and cultural and ethnic backgrounds.

    “Psychological treatments benefit men and women to the same extent; psychological treatments are equally suitable for individuals of all ages, levels of education, and cultural and ethnic backgrounds.9”

    From Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction says specific psychotherapies have success comparable to antidepressant medication as first-line treatment for moderate depression, supporting a general claim of benefit. It does not establish equal benefit for men and women or equal suitability across ages, education levels, and cultural or ethnic backgrounds; the sections on treatment selection instead discuss other patient characteristics. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychological treatments in general and CBT in particular appear to be equally effective for different subtypes of depression, including atypical, melancholic, and anxious depression.

    “Psychological treatments in general and cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in particular appear to be equally effective for different subtypes of depression, including atypical depression, melancholic depression, and anxious depression.9,10”

    From Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Selection of a Specific Psychotherapy section discusses whether clinical characteristics predict different responses to cognitive therapy and other psychotherapies, but does not compare effectiveness across atypical, melancholic, and anxious depression. The section on specific antidepressants discusses atypical symptoms and anxiety only in relation to medication response. Searches for these subtypes alongside psychotherapy and CBT found no passage supporting the cited claim; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It has been estimated that only 12 to 34% of people in routine outpatient care are eligible for participation in a pharmacotherapy trial: others are ineligible because of comorbidities or failing to meet the minimum severity threshold.

    “It has been estimated that only 12 to 34% of people in routine outpatient care are eligible for participation in a pharmacotherapy trial: others are ineligible because of comorbidities or failing to meet the minimum severity threshold. 588”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, G. E., & Perlis, R. H.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-12
Volume
167
Issue
12
Pages
1445-1455
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2148933229
Cited by
365
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 26
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH068572, R01MH085930, R01MH086026)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, personalized medicine, treatment response variability, antidepressants, psychotherapy, treatment selection, treatment moderators, predictors of treatment outcome, genetic predictors, treatment modification
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Decision Support Techniques, Depression, Humans, Psychotherapy, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review