Cited by 746Extracellular vesicles in diseaseNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

High-resolution proteomic and lipidomic analysis of exosomes and microvesicles from different cell sources

Open access
Haraszti, Reka A., Didiot, Marie‐Cecile, Sapp, Ellen, Leszyk, John, Shaffer, Scott A., Rockwell, Hannah E., Gao, Fei, Narain, Niven R. +4 more·2016·Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes and microvesicles (MVs), are explored for use in diagnostics, therapeutics and drug delivery. However, little is known about the relationship of protein and lipid composition of EVs and their source cells. Here, we report high-resolution lipidomic and proteomic analyses of exosomes and MVs derived by differential ultracentrifugation from 3 different cell types: U87 glioblastoma cells, Huh7 hepatocellular carcinoma cells and human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). We identified 3,532 proteins and 1,961 lipid species in the screen. Exosomes differed from MVs in several different areas: (a) The protein patterns of exosomes were more likely different from their cells of origin than were the protein patterns of MVs; (b) The proteomes of U87 and Huh7 exosomes were similar to each other but different from the proteomes of MSC exosomes, whereas the lipidomes of Huh7 and MSC exosomes were similar to each other but different from the lipidomes of U87 exosomes; (c) exosomes exhibited proteins of extracellular matrix, heparin-binding, receptors, immune response and cell adhesion functions, whereas MVs were enriched in endoplasmic reticulum, proteasome and mitochondrial proteins. Exosomes and MVs also differed in their types of lipid contents. Enrichment in glycolipids and free fatty acids characterized exosomes, whereas enrichment in ceramides and sphingomyelins characterized MVs. Furthermore, Huh7 and MSC exosomes were specifically enriched in cardiolipins; U87 exosomes were enriched in sphingomyelins. This study comprehensively analyses the protein and lipid composition of exosomes, MVs and source cells in 3 different cell types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/jev.v5.32570

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lipidomic and proteomic analyses on ELVs and MPs released from three different cell lines indicated that lipidomes of ELVs, MPs, and secreting cells were more similar to each other than their proteomes are.

    “Lipidomic and proteomic analyses on ELVs and MPs released from three different cell lines have indicated that lipidomes of ELVs, MP and secreting cells were more similar to each other than their proteomes are (Haraszti et al., 2016).”

    From Skeletal Muscle-Released Extracellular Vesicles: State of the Art (2019) · cites this paper as Haraszti et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haraszti, R. A., Didiot, M., Sapp, E., Leszyk, J., Shaffer, S. A., Rockwell, H. E., Gao, F., Narain, N. R., DiFiglia, M., Kiebish, M. A., Aronin, N., & Khvorova, A.
Affiliations
  • RNA Therapeutics Institute University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester MA USA
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Berg (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Khvorova, Anastasia
Venue
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
32570-32570
ISSN
2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2553886049
Cited by
746
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 31
FWCI
27.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Extracellular Vesicles (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (TR 000‐888, GM108803)
  • CHDI Foundation (A‐6119)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
exosomes, microvesicles, extracellular vesicles, vesicle proteome, cell of origin, U87 glioblastoma cells, mesenchymal stem cells, cardiolipin, sphingomyelin, ceramide, glycolipids, free fatty acids, extracellular matrix proteins, mitochondrial proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review