Cited by 78Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in treatment of acute pediatric diarrhea: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Open access
Li, Ya-Ting, Xu, Hong, Ye, Jian-Zhong, Wu, Wen-Rui, Shi, Ding, Fang, Dai-Qiong, Liu, Yang, Li, Lan-Juan·2019·World Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: GG ATCC 53013 (LGG) has been used to treat diarrhea. However, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found no evidence of a beneficial effect of LGG treatment. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of LGG in treating acute diarrhea in children. METHODS: The EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science databases, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to April 2019 for meta-analyses and RCTs. The Cochrane Review Manager was used to analyze the relevant data. RESULTS: a lower dose. A similar reduction was found in Asian and European patients [MD -24.42 h, 95%CI (-47.01, -1.82); MD -32.02 h, 95%CI (-49.26, -14.79), respectively]. A reduced duration of diarrhea was confirmed in LGG participants with diarrhea for less than 3 d at enrollment [MD -15.83 h, 95%CI (-20.68, -10.98)]. High-dose LGG effectively reduced the duration of rotavirus-induced diarrhea [MD -31.05 h, 95%CI (-50.31, -11.80)] and the stool number per day [MD -1.08, 95%CI (-1.87, -0.28)]. CONCLUSION: High-dose LGG therapy reduces the duration of diarrhea and the stool number per day. Intervention at the early stage is recommended. Future trials are expected to verify the effectiveness of LGG treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4999

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some systematic reviews and meta-analyses have supported that specific probiotic strains may be effective in certain areas.

    “While there is limited evidence around many probiotics, some systematic reviews and meta-analyses have supported that specific strains may be effective in certain areas [43,44,45,46].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Guarner F Schaafsma GJ Probiotics Int J Food Microbiol 1998 39 237 238 9553803
  2. [54]Molinaro M Aiazzi M La Torre A Cini E Banfi R [Lactobacillus Rhamnosus sepsis in a preterm infant associated with probiotic integrator use: A case report.] Recenti Prog Med 2016 107 485 486 27727257

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y.-T., Xu, H., Ye, J.-Z., Wu, W.-R., Shi, D., Fang, D.-Q., Liu, Y., & Li, L.-J.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Lund University (SE)
Venue
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2019-09-07
Volume
25
Issue
33
Pages
4999-5016
ISSN
1007-9327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971610165
Cited by
77
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • World Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, acute diarrhea, childhood diarrhea, probiotics, diarrhea duration, stool frequency, early intervention
MeSH terms
Child, Diarrhea, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review