Cited by 536Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsMemory Processes and InfluencesEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The promise and perils of self-regulated study

Open access
Kornell, Nate, Bjork, Robert A.·2007·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Self-regulated study involves many decisions, some of which people make confidently and easily (if not always optimally) and others of which are involved and difficult. Good study decisions rest on accurate monitoring of ongoing learning, a realistic mental model of how learning happens, and appropriate use of study strategies. We review our research on the decisions people make, for better or worse, when deciding what to study, how long to study, and how to study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03194055

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • College students do not appreciate that retrieval practice helps learning.

    “But if you ask college students, who are fairly sophisticated learners, how to best learn new information, their answers suggest that they do not appreciate this fact (Blasiman et al. 2017, Karpicke et al. 2009, Kornell & Bjork 2007, McCabe 2011).”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Kornell & Bjork 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Kornell, Nate
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2007-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
219-224
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W1974993098
Cited by
527
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
20.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
student self-regulation, study time allocation, study habits, learning monitoring, metacognition, decision-making
MeSH terms
Choice Behavior, Culture, Humans, Learning, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retention, Psychology, Social Control, Informal, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review