Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exposure effects on music preference and recognition

Open access
Peretz, Isabelle, Gaudreau, Danielle, Bonnel, Anne-Marie·1998·Memory & Cognition

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03201171

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Attneave, F., &Olson, R. (1971). Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling.American Journal of Psychology,84, 147–166. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bartlett, J., &Dowling, J. (1980). The recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in development perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 501–515. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.6.3.501
  3. Bartlett, J., Halpern, A., &Dowling, J. (1995). Recognition of familiar and unfamiliar melodies in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease.Memory & Cognition,23, 531–546. · DOI
  4. Bassili, J. N., Smith, M. C., &MacLeod, C. M. (1989). Auditory and visual word-stem completion: Separating data-driven and conceptually driven processes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 439–453. · DOI
  5. Berthier, J. E. (1979).1000 chants. Paris: Les Presses de l’Ile-de-France.
  6. Biederman, R., &Cooper, L. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 121–133. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.121 · Paper page
  7. Bornstein, R., &d’Agostino, P. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/ attributional model of the mere exposure effect.Social Cognition,12, 103–128. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Brickman, P., Redfield, J., Harrison, A., &Crandall, R. (1972). Drive and predisposition as factors in the attidudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,8, 31–44. · DOI
  9. Carlesimo, G. A., Marfia, G. A., Loasses, A., &Caltagirone, C. (1994). Perceptual and conceptual components in implicit and explicit stem completion.Neuropsychologia,34, 785–792. · DOI
  10. Cave, C. B., Bost, P. R., &Cobb, R. E. (1996). Effects of color and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 639–653. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.639
  11. Cave, C. B., &Squire, L. R. (1992). Intact and long-lasting repetition priming in amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 509–520. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.509 · Paper page
  12. Chiu, C.-Y., &Schacter, D. L. (1995). Auditory priming for nonverbal information: Implicit and explicit memory for environmental sounds.Consciousness & Cognition,4, 440–458. · doi:10.1006/ccog.1995.1050
  13. Church, B. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1994). Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 521–533. · DOI
  14. Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., &Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 43–57. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.43
  15. Craik, F., Moscovitch, M., &McDowd, J. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 864–875. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.864 · Paper page
  16. Cross, I., Howell, P., &West, R. (1983). Preferences for scale structure in melodic sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 444–460. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.9.3.444
  17. Dorfman, D. D., &Alf, E., Jr. (1969). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence interval-rating-method data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,6, 487–496. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Dowling, J., &Fujitani, D. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 524–531. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ellis, H., Shepherd, J., &Davies, G. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition.Perception,8, 431–439. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gilliland, A., &Moore, H. (1924). The immediate and long-time effects of classical and popular phonograph selections.Journal of Applied Psychology,8, 309–323. · DOI
  21. Goldinger, S. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1166–1183. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1166 · Paper page
  22. Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Graf, P., Mandler, G., &Haden, P. E. (1982). Simulating amnesic symptoms in normals.Sciences,218, 1243–1244. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley. (Reprinted 1974 by Krieger, Huntington, New York)
  25. Greve, K. W., &Bauer, R. M. (1990). Implicit learning of new faces in prosopagnosia: An application of the mere exposure paradigm.Neuropsychologia,28, 1035–1041. · DOI
  26. Heingartner, A., &Hall, J. (1974). Affective consequences in adults and children of repeated exposure to auditory stimuli.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,29, 719–723. · DOI
  27. Heyduk, R. G. (1975). Rated preference for musical compositions as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 84–90. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340. · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306 · Paper page
  29. Jacoby, L. L., &Kelley, C. M. (1987). Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,13, 314–336. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Java, R., &Gardiner, J. (1991). Priming and aging: Further evidence of preserved memory function.American Journal of Psychology,104, 89–100. · DOI
  31. Java, R., Kaminska, Z., &Gardiner, J. (1995). Recognition memory and awareness for famous and obscure musical themes.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,7, 41–53. · DOI
  32. Johnson, M., Kim, J., &Risse, G. (1985). Do alcoholic Korsakoff ’s syndrome patients acquire affective reactions?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 22–36. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Klatzky, R. L., &Forrest, F. H. (1984). Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces.Memory & Cognition,12, 60–70. · DOI
  34. Krugman, H. (1943). Affective responses to music as a function of familiarity.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,38, 388–392. · DOI
  35. Lieberman, L., &Walters, W. (1968). Effects of repeated listening on connotative meaning of serious music.Perceptual & Motor Skills,26, 891–895. · DOI
  36. Light, L., &Singh, A. (1987). Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 531–541. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.531 · Paper page
  37. Lupker, S., Harbuk, J., &Patrick, A. (1991). Memory for things forgotten.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 897–907. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.5.897
  38. MacMillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., &Van Zandt, B. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure to stimuli that cannot be recognized.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 646–648. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.646 · Paper page
  40. Marsolek, C. J., Kosslyn, S. M., &Squire, L. R. (1992). Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 492–508. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.492 · Paper page
  41. Meyer, M. (1903). Experimental studies in the psychology of music.American Journal of Psychology,14, 456–478.
  42. Micco, A., &Masson, M. (1991). Implicit memory for new associations: An interactive process approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1105–1123. · DOI
  43. Moore, T. (1914). The genetic aspect of consonance and dissonance.Psychological Monographs (Whole No. 73). · doi:10.1037/h0093083
  44. Moscovitch, M., Vriezen, E., &Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (1993). Implicit tests of memory in patients with focal lesions or degenerative brain disorders. In H. Spinnler & F. Boller (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp.133–173). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  45. Mull, H. (1957). The effect of repetition upon enjoyment of modern music.Journal of Psychology,43, 155–162. · DOI
  46. Nelson, D. L., Shreiber, T. A., &Holley, P. E. (1992). The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.Memory & Cognition,20, 671–684. · DOI
  47. Park, D., &Shaw, R. (1992). Effect of environmental support on implicit and explicit memory in younger and older adults.Psychology & Aging,7, 632–642. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Peretz, I. (1996). Can we lose memory for music? A case of music agnosia in a nonmusician.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 481–496. · DOI
  49. Peretz, I., Babaï, M., Lussier, I., Hébert, S., &Gagnon, L. (1995). Corpus d’extraits musicaux: Indices relatifs à la familiarité, à l’âge d’acquisition et aux évocations verbales.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 211–239. · doi:10.1037/1196-1961.49.2.211
  50. Radvansky, G., Fleming, K., &Simmons, J. (1995). Timbre reliance in nonmusicians’ and musicians’ memory for melodies.Music Perception,13, 127–140. · DOI
  51. Rajaram, S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 765–776. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.765 · Paper page
  52. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of Neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  53. Roediger, H. L., III,Weldon, M. L., Stadler, M. L., &Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1251–1269. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.6.1251 · Paper page
  54. Russel, P. (1987). Memory for music: A study of musical and listener factors.British Journal of Psychology,78, 335–347. · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02251.x
  55. Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., &Booker, J. (1989). Intentional awareness and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.),Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  56. Schacter, D. L., &Church, B. A. (1992). Auditory priming: Implicit and explicit memory for words and voices.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 915–930. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.915
  57. Schacter, D. L., &Church, B. [A.] (1995). Implicit memory in amnesic patients: When is auditory priming spared?Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,1, 434–442. · DOI
  58. Schacter, D. L., Church, B. [A.], &Bolton, E. (1995). Implicit memory in amnesic patients: Impairment of voice-specific priming.Psychological Science,6, 20–25. · DOI
  59. Schacter, D. L., Church, B. A., &Osowiecki, D. (1994). Auditory priming in elderly adults: Impairment of voice-specific implicit memory.Memory,2, 295–323. · DOI
  60. Schacter, D. L., Church, B. [A.], &Treadwell, J. (1994). Implicit memory in amnesic patients: Evidence for spared auditory priming.Psychological Science,5, 20–25. · DOI
  61. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., &Delaney, S. M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 5–24. · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.119.1.5 · Paper page
  62. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., Delaney, S. M., Peterson, M. A., &Tharan, M. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 3–19. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.1.3
  63. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., &Teadwell, J. (1993). Preserved priming of novel objects across size transformation in amnesic patients.Psychological Science,4, 331–335. · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00574.x
  64. Schacter, D. L., &Tulving, E. (Eds.) (1994).Memory systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
  65. Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., &Kauff, D. M. (1983). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 187–189. · DOI
  66. Seamon, J. G., Ganor-Stern, D., Crowley, M. J., Wilson, S. M., Weber, W. J., O’Rourke, C. M., &Mahoney, J. K. (1997). A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 367–374 · DOI
  67. Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S., Orne, P., &Wishengrad, D. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 711–721. · DOI
  68. Smith, J. D., &Melara, R. J. (1990). Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: `Tis the gift to be simple.Cognition,34, 279–298. · DOI
  69. Snodgrass, J. G., Hishman, E., &Fan, J. (1996). The sensory match effect in recognition memory: Perceptual fluency or episodic trace?Memory & Cognition,24, 367–383. · DOI
  70. Squire, L., Shimamura, A., &Graf, P. (1987). Strength and duration of priming effects in normal subjects and amnesic patients.Neuropsychologia,25, 195–210. · DOI · Paper page
  71. Tobias, B., Kihlstrom, J., &Schacter, D. L. (1992). Emotion and implicit memory. In S. Christanson (Ed.),The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 67–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  72. Tulving, E., &Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems.Science,247, 301–306. · DOI · Paper page
  73. Van der Linden, M., Lories, G., &Cornille, M. (1993). The abstraction of a central tendency in amnesic patients.Cortex,29, 543–548. · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80259-6
  74. Verveer, E., Barry, H., &Bousfield, W. (1933). Change in affectivity with repetition.American Journal of Psychology,45, 130–134. · DOI
  75. Warrington, E. K., &Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesic syndrome: Consolidation or retrieval?Nature,228, 628–630. · DOI · Paper page
  76. Washburn, M., Child, M., &Abel, T. (1927). The effects of immediate repetition on the pleasantness of music. In M. Schoen (Ed.),The effects of music (pp. 199–210). New York: Harcourt, Brace.
  77. Wilson, W. (1979). Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,37, 811–821. · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.811 · Paper page
  78. Wolpert, R. (1990). Recognition of melody, harmonic accompaniment, and instrumentation: Musicians vs. nonmusicians.Music Perception,8, 95–106. · doi:10.2307/40285487
  79. Yonelinas, A. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1341 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Peretz, I., Gaudreau, D., & Bonnel, A.-M.
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
1998-09
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
884-902
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W1964786562
Cited by
308
References
6
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03201171
The paper
Peretz, I., Gaudreau, D., & Bonnel, A.-M. (1998). Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03201171

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.