Cited by 417Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Retrieval-induced forgetting: evidence for a recall-specific mechanism

Anderson, Michael C., Bjork, Elizabeth L., Bjork, Robert A.·2000·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Previous work has shown that recalling information from long-term memory can impair the long-term retention of related representations--a phenomenon known as retrieval-induced forgetting (Anderson, Bjork, & Bjork, 1994). We report an experiment in which the question of whether retrieval is necessary to induce this form of impairment was examined. All the subjects studied six members from each of eight taxonomic categories (e.g., fruit orange). In the competitive practice condition, the subjects practiced recalling three of the six members, using category-stem cues (e.g., fruit or__). In the noncompetitive practice condition, the subjects were reexposed to these same members for the same number of repetitions but were asked to recall the category name by using the exemplar and a stem as cues (e.g., fr__orange). Despite significant and comparable facilitation of practiced items in both conditions, only the competitive practice subjects were impaired in their ability to recall the nonpracticed members on a delayed cued-recall test. These findings argue that retrieval-induced forgetting is not caused by increased competition arising from the strengthening of practiced items, but by inhibitory processes specific to the situation of recall.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03214366

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Michael C.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2000-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
522-530
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2054727733
Cited by
417
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 27
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
retrieval-induced forgetting, inhibitory processes, long-term memory retention, competitive practices, cued recall
MeSH terms
Adult, Cues, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Practice, Psychological, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review