Cited by 69Cognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Assessing the validity of computer-game-like tests of processing speed and working memory

Open access
McPherson, Jason, Burns, Nicholas R.·2008·Behavior Research Methods

Abstract

Processing speed (Gs) and working memory (WM) tasks have received considerable interest as correlates of more complex cognitive performance measures. Gs and WM tasks are often repetitive and are often rigidly presented, however. The effects of Gs and WM may, therefore, be confounded with those of motivation and anxiety. In an effort to address this problem, we assessed the concurrent and predictive validity of computer-game-like tests of Gs (Space Code) and WM (Space Matrix) across two experiments. In Experiment 1, within a university sample (N = 70), Space Matrix exhibited concurrent validity as a WM measure, whereas Space Code appeared to be a mixed-ability measure. In Experiment 2, Space Matrix exhibited concurrent validity as well as predictive validity (as a predictor of school grades) within a school-aged sample (N = 94), but the results for Space Code were less encouraging. Relationships between computer-game-like tests and gender, handedness, and computer-game experience are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/brm.40.4.969

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. ment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 203-233). New York: Guilford.
  2. Aliya, K. S. (2002). The role of computer games in the development of theoretical analysis, flexibility and reflective thinking in children: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 45, 149.
  3. Mitchell, A., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning: A review of the literature. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
  4. Raven, J. C., Raven, J. E., & Court, J. H. (1998). Progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McPherson, J., & Burns, N. R.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
McPherson, Jason
Venue
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2008-11
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
969-981
ISSN
  • 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-3528
OpenAlex
W2048716432
Cited by
69
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
processing speed, working memory, SPACE code, SPACE matrix, concurrent validity, predictive validity, motivation, anxiety, school grades, gender differences, handedness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Computers, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Psychology, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Reproducibility of Results, Video Games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review