Cited by 410Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Working Memory and Intelligence--Their Correlation and Their Relation: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).

Oberauer, Klaus, Schulze, Ralf, Wilhelm, Oliver, Süß, Heinz-Martin·2005·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

On the basis of a meta-analysis of pairwise correlations between working memory tasks and cognitive ability measures, P. L. Ackerman, M. E. Beier, and M. O. Boyle (2005; see record 2004-22408-002) claimed that working memory capacity (WMC) shares less than 25% of its variance with general intelligence (g) and with reasoning ability. In this comment, the authors argue that this is an underestimation because of several methodological shortcomings and biases. A reanalysis of the data reported in Ackerman et al. using the correct statistical procedures demonstrates that g and WMC are very highly correlated. On a conceptual level, the authors point out that WMC should be regarded as an explanatory construct for intellectual abilities. Theories of working memory do not claim that WMC is isomorphic with intelligence factors but that it is a very strong predictor of reasoning ability and also predicts general fluid intelligence and g.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.61

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working memory and fluid intelligence share at least 50% of their variance.

    “Estimates report a shared variance of at least 50% (Kane, Hambrick, & Conway, 2005;Oberauer, Schulze, Wilhelm, & Suss, 2005)”

    From Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis (2015) · cites this paper as Oberauer, Schulze, Wilhelm, & Suss, 2005

  • Fluid intelligence and WM share common variance.

    “Although fluid intelligence and WM share common variance (Colom et al., 2004; Oberauer et al., 2005; Friedman et al., 2006; Harrison et al., 2015)”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Oberauer et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oberauer, K., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Süß, H.-M.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2005
Volume
131
Issue
1
Pages
61-65
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2107457769
Cited by
410
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 23
FWCI
21.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory capacity, general intelligence, fluid intelligence, reasoning skills, meta-analysis reanalysis, methodological bias, intelligence factors
MeSH terms
Humans, Intelligence, Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review