Cited by 641Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Imaging brain plasticity during motor skill learning

Ungerleider, L·2002·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

The search for the neural substrates mediating the incremental acquisition of skilled motor behaviors has been the focus of a large body of animal and human studies in the past decade. Much less is known, however, with regard to the dynamic neural changes that occur in the motor system during the different phases of learning. In this paper, we review recent findings, mainly from our own work using fMRI, which suggest that: (i) the learning of sequential finger movements produces a slowly evolving reorganization within primary motor cortex (M1) over the course of weeks and (ii) this change in M1 follows more dynamic, rapid changes in the cerebellum, striatum, and other motor-related cortical areas over the course of days. We also briefly review neurophysiological and psychophysical evidence for the consolidation of motor skills, and we propose a working hypothesis of its underlying neural substrate in motor sequence learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nlme.2002.4091

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroimaging studies show that with extremely extended training (several weeks), slowly evolving BOLD signals in the primary motor cortex begin to discriminate between practiced and novel sequences.

    “Additional support for this view comes from neuroimaging studies showing that, with extremely extended training (i.e., several weeks), slowly evolving BOLD signals in the primary motor cortex (M1) begin to discriminate between practiced and novel sequences [79].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ungerleider, L.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Ungerleider, L
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
553-564
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080139468
Cited by
641
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 27
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
motor skill learning, neuroplasticity, motor sequence learning, primary motor cortex, cerebellum, striatum, motor cortex reorganization, motor skill consolidation, finger movement
MeSH terms
Brain, Cerebellum, Corpus Striatum, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Motor Cortex, Motor Skills, Neuronal Plasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review