Cited by 1,580Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attentionCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mindfulness training modifies subsystems of attention

Open access
JHA, A. P., KROMPINGER, J., BAIME, M. J.·2007·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Mindfulness is defined as paying attention in the present moment. We investigate the hypothesis that mindfulness training may alter or enhance specific aspects of attention. We examined three functionally and neuroanatomically distinct but overlapping attentional subsystems: alerting, orienting, and conflict monitoring. Functioning of each subsystem was indexed by performance on the Attention Network Test. Two types of mindfulness training (MT) programs were examined, and behavioral testing was conducted on participants before (Time 1) and after (Time 2) training. One training group consisted of individuals naive to mindfulness techniques who participated in an 8-week mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) course that emphasized the development of concentrative meditation skills. The other training group consisted of individuals experienced in concentrative meditation techniques who participated in a 1-month intensive mindfulness retreat. Performance of these groups was compared with that of control participants who were meditation naive and received no MT. At Time 1, the participants in the retreat group demonstrated improved conflict monitoring performance relative to those in the MBSR and control groups. At Time 2, the participants in the MBSR course demonstrated significantly improved orienting in comparison with the control and retreat participants. In contrast, the participants in the retreat group demonstrated altered performance on the alerting component, with improvements in exogenous stimulus detection in comparison with the control and MBSR participants. The groups did not differ in conflict monitoring performance at Time 2. These results suggest that mindfulness training may improve attention-related behavioral responses by enhancing functioning of specific subcomponents of attention. Whereas participation in the MBSR course improved the ability to endogenously orient attention, retreat participation appeared to allow for the development and emergence of receptive attentional skills, which improved exogenous alerting-related process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/cabn.7.2.109

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [5]5. Broadbent, D. E. (1970). Stimulus set and response set: Two kinds of selective attention. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis (pp. 51-60). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  2. [11]11. Delmonte, M. M. (1987). Meditation: Contemporary theoretical ap- proaches. In M. A. West (Ed.), The psychology of meditation (pp. 39- 58). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
  3. [31]31. Posner, M. I., & Badgaiyan, R. D. (1998). Attention and neural net- works. In R. W. Parks, D. S. Levine, & D. L. Long (Eds.), Funda- mentals of neural network modeling: Neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 61-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. [41]41. Speeth, K. R. (1982). On psychotherapeutic attention. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 14, 141-160.
  5. [47]47. Wallace, B. A. (1999). The Buddhist tradition of Samatha: Methods for refining and examining consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 175-187.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,580

Metadata

Authors
JHA, A. P., KROMPINGER, J., & BAIME, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
JHA, A. P.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
109-119
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2132002500
Cited by
1,580
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 86
FWCI
49.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institutes of Health (5r21at002761-02)
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (1 R21 AT002761)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
mindfulness training, alerting, orienting, conflict monitoring, Attention Network Test, mindfulness-based stress reduction, concentrative meditation, top-down attention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Conflict, Psychological, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Space Perception, Stress, Psychological, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review