Cited by 13Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Examining the Role of Lateral Parietal Cortex in Emotional Distancing Using TMS

Powers, John P., Davis, Simon W., Neacsiu, Andrada D., Beynel, Lysianne, Appelbaum, Lawrence G., LaBar, Kevin S.·2020·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

We recently proposed a neurocognitive model of distancing-an emotion regulation tactic-with a focus on the lateral parietal cortex. Although this brain area has been implicated in both cognitive control and self-projection processes during distancing, fMRI work suggests that these processes may be dissociable here. This preregistered (NCT03698591) study tested the contribution of left temporoparietal junction (TPJ) to distancing using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. We hypothesized that inhibiting left TPJ would decrease the efficiency of distancing but not distraction, another regulation tactic with similar cognitive control requirements, thus implicating this region in the self-projection processes unique to distancing. Active and sham continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) were applied to 30 healthy adults in a single-session crossover design. Tactic efficiency was measured using online reports of valence and effort. The stimulation target was established from the group TPJ fMRI activation peak in an independent sample using the same distancing task, and anatomical MRI scans were used for individual targeting. Analyses employed both repeated-measures ANOVA and analytic procedures tailored to crossover designs. Irrespective of cTBS, distancing led to greater decreases in negative valence over time relative to distraction, and distancing effort decreased over time while distraction effort remained stable. Exploratory analyses also revealed that active cTBS made distancing more effortful, but not distraction. Thus, left TPJ seems to support self-projection processes in distancing, and these processes may be facilitated by repeated use. These findings help to clarify the role of lateral parietal cortex in distancing and inform applications of distancing and distraction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13415-020-00821-5

Cites

39 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Neurophysiology, 122 (8), 1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph. 2010.12.037 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powers, J. P., Davis, S. W., Neacsiu, A. D., Beynel, L., Appelbaum, L. G., & LaBar, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
LaBar, Kevin S.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2020-08-24
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
1090-1102
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W3081008835
Cited by
13
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotional distancing, emotion regulation, temporoparietal junction, lateral parietal cortex, self-projection, cognitive control, distraction, continuous theta burst stimulation, negative valence
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Attention, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Cross-Over Studies, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review