Cited by 16Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Multivariate Patterns of Posterior Cortical Activity Differentiate Forms of Emotional Distancing

Open access
Powers, John P, Graner, John L, LaBar, Kevin S·2020·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Distancing is an effective tactic for emotion regulation, which can take several forms depending on the type(s) of psychological distance being manipulated to modify affect. We recently proposed a neurocognitive model of emotional distancing, but it is unknown how its specific forms are instantiated in the brain. Here, we presented healthy young adults (N = 34) with aversive pictures during functional magnetic resonance imaging to directly compare behavioral performance and brain activity across spatial, temporal, and objective forms of distancing. We found emotion regulation performance to be largely comparable across these forms. A conjunction analysis of activity associated with these forms yielded a high degree of overlap, encompassing regions of the default mode and frontoparietal networks as predicted by our model. A multivariate pattern classification further revealed distributed patches of posterior cortical activation that discriminated each form from one another. These findings not only confirm aspects of our overarching model but also elucidate a novel role for cortical regions in and around the parietal lobe in selectively supporting spatial, temporal, and social cognitive processes to distance oneself from an emotional encounter. These regions may provide new targets for brain-based interventions for emotion dysregulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhz273

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a paucity of empirical research examining neuro-cognitive accounts of decentering.

    “However, there is a paucity of empirical research examining these neuro-cognitive accounts21,30.”

    From Decentering as a core component in the psychological treatment and prevention of youth anxiety and depression: a narrative review and insight report (2021) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the neural correlates of component processes in different forms of emotional distancing remain relatively unknown and that no studies had directly compared those forms. This supports a research gap concerning distancing, but the source does not establish a broader paucity of empirical research on neurocognitive accounts of decentering. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Few have explored the neuro-cognitive processes that mediate the impact of decentering based techniques on negative emotional states.

    “However, few have explored the neuro-cognitive processes that mediate the impact of decentering based techniques on negative emotional states29,30.”

    From Decentering as a core component in the psychological treatment and prevention of youth anxiety and depression: a narrative review and insight report (2021) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that the neural correlates of processes contributing to different forms of emotional distancing remain relatively unknown. This supports the claim for distancing techniques used to regulate negative emotion, but the paper does not establish the same research gap for decentering-based techniques generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beck AT, Rush S, Shaw P, Emery N. 1979. Cognitive therapy of depression. New York (NY): Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powers, J. P., Graner, J. L., & LaBar, K. S.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
LaBar, Kevin S
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2019-12-09
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
2766-2776
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2996360192
Cited by
16
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research (DGE-1644868)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 MH113238)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
emotional distancing, emotion regulation, psychological distance, social distancing, default mode network, frontoparietal network, posterior cortex, parietal lobe, multivariate pattern classification, emotional dysregulation
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, Adolescent, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Emotions, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Random Allocation, Multivariate Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review