Cited by 125Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Human memory reconsolidation can be explained using the temporal context model

Open access
Sederberg, Per B., Gershman, Samuel J., Polyn, Sean M., Norman, Kenneth A.·2011·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Recent work by Hupbach, Gomez, Hardt, and Nadel (Learning & Memory, 14, 47-53, 2007) and Hupbach, Gomez, and Nadel (Memory, 17, 502-510, 2009) suggests that episodic memory for a previously studied list can be updated to include new items, if participants are reminded of the earlier list just prior to learning a new list. The key finding from the Hupbach studies was an asymmetric pattern of intrusions, whereby participants intruded numerous items from the second list when trying to recall the first list, but not viceversa. Hupbach et al. (2007; 2009) explained this pattern in terms of a cellular reconsolidation process, whereby first-list memory is rendered labile by the reminder and the labile memory is then updated to include items from the second list. Here, we show that the temporal context model of memory, which lacks a cellular reconsolidation process, can account for the asymmetric intrusion effect, using well-established principles of contextual reinstatement and item-context binding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-011-0086-9

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One way that reactivation may support memory updating is via contextual reinstatement, by linking novel information that occurs during retrieval with the reinstated context of the reactivated memory.

    “One way that reactivation may support memory updating is via contextual reinstatement, by linking novel information that occurs during retrieval with the reinstated context of the reactivated memory (47, 49).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sederberg, P. B., Gershman, S. J., Polyn, S. M., & Norman, K. A.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Sederberg, Per B.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2011-04-22
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
455-468
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2087502533
Cited by
125
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH069456, F32MH080526, MH080526, R01MH069456)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
memory reconsolidation, episodic memory, list recall, contextual reinstatement, memory updating
MeSH terms
Cues, Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological, Mental Recall, Serial Learning, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review