Cited by 144Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthBreastfeeding Practices and Influences

Impact of dietary counselling and probiotic intervention on maternal anthropometric measurements during and after pregnancy: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Ilmonen, Johanna, Isolauri, Erika, Poussa, Tuija, Laitinen, Kirsi·2011·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims To establish whether probiotic supplemented dietary counselling influences maternal anthropometric measurements during and after pregnancy.Methods At the first trimester of pregnancy 256 women were randomly assigned to receive nutrition counselling to modify dietary intake according to current recommendations or as controls; dietary intervention groups were further randomized to receive probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) and Bifidobacterium lactis (diet/probiotics) or placebo (diet/placebo) capsules in a double-blind manner, whilst the controls received placebo (control/placebo). The intervention lasted until the end of exclusive breastfeeding for up to six months.Results The risk of central adiposity defined as waist circumference 80 cm or more was lowered in women in the diet/probiotics group compared with the control/placebo group (OR 0.30, 95%CI 0.11-0.85, p = 0.023 adjusted for baseline BMI), whilst the diet/placebo group did not differ from the controls (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.38-2.68, p = 0.994) at 6 months postpartum. The number needed to treat (NNT) with diet/probiotics to prevent one woman from developing a waist circumference of 80 cm or more was 4. Healthy eating pattern at 12 months postpartum (p = 0.001) and BMI prior to pregnancy (p < 0.001) were strong determinants of BMI at 12 months postpartum when adjusted for dietary intervention and exercise.Conclusion The impact of probiotics-supplemented dietary counselling on central adiposity, may offer a novel means for the prevention and management of obesity. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT 00167700, section 3.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.09.009

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ilmonen, J., Isolauri, E., Poussa, T., & Laitinen, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Nokia (Finland) (FI)
Corresponding author
Laitinen, Kirsi
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
156-164
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007527207
Cited by
144
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Juho Vainion Säätiö
  • Valio
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Keywords
probiotics, nutrition counseling, maternal anthropometry, abdominal obesity, waist circumference, pregnancy, postpartum obesity, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anthropometry, Bifidobacterium, Breast Feeding, Counseling, Diet, Double-Blind Method, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lactobacillus, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Logistic Models, Single-Blind Method, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review