Cited by 19Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Nutrient-dense protein as a primary dietary strategy in healthy ageing: please sir, may we have more?

Open access
Nunes, E. A., Currier, B. S., Lim, C., Phillips, S. M.·2021·Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

Abstract

A progressive decrement in muscle mass and muscle function, sarcopoenia, accompanies ageing. The loss of skeletal muscle mass and function is the main feature of sarcopoenia. Preventing the loss of muscle mass is relevant since sarcopoenia can have a significant impact on mobility and the quality of life of older people. Dietary protein and physical activity have an essential role in slowing muscle mass loss and helping to maintain muscle function. However, the current recommendations for daily protein ingestion for older persons appear to be too low and are in need of adjustment. In this review, we discuss the skeletal muscle response to protein ingestion, and review the data examining current dietary protein recommendations in the older subjects. Furthermore, we review the concept of protein quality and the important role that nutrient-dense protein (NDP) sources play in meeting overall nutrient requirements and improving dietary quality. Overall, the current evidence endorses an increase in the daily ingestion of protein with emphasis on the ingestion of NDP choices by older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0029665120007892

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The optimal daily protein intake level required to optimize skeletal muscle mass gain or maintenance in healthy adults is still largely unclear.

    “Particularly, the optimal daily protein intake level required to optimize skeletal muscle mass gain or maintenance in healthy adults, which is still largely unclear.”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The ‘Ageing and protein requirements’ section says the RDA is a minimum to prevent protein loss, not an optimal intake. ‘Optimising protein nutrition’ reports inconsistent findings and calls for further testing, supporting uncertainty about the precise intake for muscle gain or maintenance in older adults. The paper also cites a recommended range of 1.2–1.6 g/kg/day for adults, so it does not establish that the optimum is largely unclear across all healthy adults. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Therefore, our findings reflect mainly the effect of animal-based protein sources.

    “Therefore, our findings reflect mainly the effect of animal‐based protein sources. 11”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Shafiee G, Keshtkar A, Soltani A et al. (2017) Prevalence of sarcopenia in the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of general population studies. J Diabetes Metab Disord 16, 21.
  2. McGrath R, Stastny S, Casperson S et al. (2019) Daily protein intake and distribution of daily protein consumed decreases odds for functional disability in older Americans. J Aging Health. Available at: https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31625427/. 119. Houston DK, Tooze JA, Garcia K et al. (2017) Protein intake and mobility limitation in community-dwelling older adults: the health ABC study. J Am Geriatr Soc 65, 1705-1711. 120.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nunes, E. A., Currier, B. S., Lim, C., & Phillips, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Phillips, S. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Published
2020-10-14
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
264-277
ISSN
  • 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2719
OpenAlex
W3091967282
Cited by
19
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (2019-8, 308584/2019-8)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
sarcopenia, healthy aging, older adults, protein intake, protein recommendations, protein quality, skeletal muscle mass, muscle function, mobility (physical function), physical activity, diet quality
MeSH terms
Healthy Aging, Nutrients, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Quality of Life, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review