Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigating the reversed causality of engagement and burnout in job demands-resources theory

De Beer, Leon T., Pienaar, Jaco, Rothmann, Sebastiaan·2013·SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

Abstract

Orientation: Reversed causality is an area that has not commanded major attention within the South African context, specifically pertaining to engagement, burnout and job demands resources. Therefore, this necessitated an investigation to elucidate the potential effects.Research purpose: To investigate the reversed causal hypotheses of burnout and engagement in job demands-resources theory over time.Motivation for the study: Organisations and researchers should be made aware of the effects that burnout and engagement could have over time on resources and demands.Research design, approach and method: A longitudinal design was employed. The availability sample (n = 593) included participants from different demographic backgrounds. A survey was used to measure all constructs at both points in time. Structural equation modelling techniques were implemented with a categorical estimator to investigate the proposed hypotheses.Main findings: Burnout was found to have a significant negative longitudinal relationship with colleague support and supervisor support, whilst the negative relationship with supervisor support over time was more prominent. Engagement showed only one significant but small, negative relationship with supervisor support over time. All other relationships were statistically non-significant.Practical/managerial implications: This study makes organisations aware of the relationship between burnout and relationships at work over time. Proactive measures to promote relationships at work, specifically supervisor support, should be considered in addition to combatting burnout itself and promoting engagement.Contribution/value-add: This study provides insights and information on reversed causality, namely, the effects that engagement and burnout can have over time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4102/sajip.v39i1.1055

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
FIGURE 1 Illustration of reversed causal hypotheses under investigation.
FIGURE 1 Illustration of reversed causal hypotheses under investigation.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1002/smi.1266 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/a0020726 · DOI
  3. 10.1348/096317909X402596 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1108/02683940710733115 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00030-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/13594320344000165 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/1072-5245.10.1.16 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/hrm.20004 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1177/0730888404266349 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00429.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.2466/01.03.10.PR0.111.5.528-544 · DOI
  13. 10.1201/9780203422809.ch2 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/02678370802390132 · DOI
  15. 10.5271/sjweh.843 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1084 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/02678370802379432 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/1464-0597.00062 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1177/0021886396321002 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.07.003 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/9781444306538 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/10705510701303921 · DOI
  24. 10.1097/01.psy.0000242860.24009.f0 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/10615806.2003.10382973 · DOI
  26. 10.2307/3250982 · DOI
  27. 10.5465/AMR.2000.3312920 · DOI
  28. 10.4102/sajip.v29i4.127 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/job.248 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1002/job.595 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1023/A:1015630930326 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/02678370500385913 · DOI
  33. 10.1037/a0019796 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/smi.1283 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/0470029307.ch7 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/1076-8998.2.4.275 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00255-0 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/02678370802393672 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.2307/249075 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
De Beer, L. T., Pienaar, J., & Rothmann, S.
Venue
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
Publisher
AOSIS
Published
2013-01-25
Volume
39
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2071-0763
  • 0258-5200
Cited by
14
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review