Cited by 192Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Brief report: Cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorders: A quantitative review

Leung, Rachel C., Zakzanis, Konstantine K.·2014·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Impairments in cognitive flexibility have been used to characterize the neuropsychological presentation of persons with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Previous studies have yielded mixed results. Our objective was to systematically review the sensitivity of cognitive flexibility measures in ASD using quantitative methods employed by meta-analytic statistical techniques. Seventy-two studies met inclusion criteria for analysis and included a total of 2,137 individuals with ASD and 2,185 healthy controls. Our findings demonstrate that while the shift sub-scale of the self-report version of the Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) showed approximate absolute discriminability, of all the performance measures that were systematically reviewed and evaluated, none could reliably differentiate between individuals with ASD and controls; this is not surprising given that cognitive flexibility is not a core deficit of ASD. Our findings suggest that while the shift sub-scale of the self-report version of the BRIEF is a promising clinical marker, clinical performance measures of cognitive flexibility may lack ecological validity and lastly, reinforces that impairments in cognitive flexibility do not uniformly characterize all persons with ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-014-2136-4

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For ASD, only half of the samples in each cohort showed FLEX-EMOT, challenging the often held notion that cognitive inflexibility is the hallmark EF comorbidity in ASD.

    “For ASD, only half of the samples in each cohort showed the FLEX-EMOT profile, which challenges the often held notion of cognitive inflexibility as the hallmark EF comorbidity in ASD (Leung & Zakzanis, 2014).”
  • The difficulty with cognitive strategies may be reflective of the challenges many autistic people experience with cognitive flexibility.

    “For example, several participants reported that cognitive strategies were difficult because they had trouble changing their thoughts, which may be reflective of the challenges many autistic people experience with cognitive flexibility (Leung & Zakzanis, 2014).”

    From A mixed methods study of autistic adults' mental health therapy experiences (2023) · cites this paper as Leung & Zakzanis, 2014

  • Several participants reported that cognitive strategies were difficult because they had trouble changing their thoughts.

    “For example, several participants reported that cognitive strategies were difficult because they had trouble changing their thoughts, which may be reflective of the challenges many autistic people experience with cognitive flexibility (Leung & Zakzanis, 2014).”

    From A mixed methods study of autistic adults' mental health therapy experiences (2023) · cites this paper as Leung & Zakzanis, 2014

  • Individuals with ASD exhibit impairment in set-shifting across a broad range of samples, tasks, and measurement constructs.

    “individuals with ASD exhibited an impairment in set-shifting”
  • Effect size for set-shifting difficulties is consistently and substantially larger for daily life measures than for experimental tasks.

    “effect size is consistently and substantially larger for set-shifting difficulties in daily life relative to that observed on experimental tasks”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leung, R. C., & Zakzanis, K. K.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Leung, Rachel C.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
2628-2645
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1981575082
Cited by
192
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sick Kids Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
cognitive flexibility, autism spectrum disorder, executive function, neuropsychological assessment, discriminability, ecological validity, clinical biomarkers
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Cognition, Female, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Executive Function, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review