The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,501–2,600 of 4,692
Continuation KD: Improved Knowledge Distillation through the Lens of Continuation Optimization
Jafari, A., Kobyzev, I., Rezagholizadeh, M., Poupart, P., & Ghodsi, A. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.385 · Cited by 6
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Multi-Topic Short-Text Corpora
Ait-Saada, M., & Nadif, M. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.101 · Cited by 5
Performance of Distributed Deep Learning Workloads on a Composable Cyberinfrastructure
He, Z., Saluja, A., Lawrence, R., Chakravorty, D. K., Dang, F., Pérez, L. M., & Liu, H. (2023) · Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing · doi:10.1145/3569951.3593601 · Cited by 5
Evolving masked low-rank transformer for long text understanding
Liu, C., Chen, X., Lin, J., Hu, P., Wang, J., & Geng, X. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111207 · Cited by 5
Learning Trajectory-Word Alignments for Video-Language Tasks
Xu, Y., Li, Z., Xu, H., Zhang, H., Ye, Q., Li, C., Yan, M., Zhang, Y., Huang, F., & Huang, S. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00237 · Cited by 7
HungerGist: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Food Insecurity
Ahn, Y., Yan, M., Lin, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386346 · Cited by 5
Characterizing Information Seeking Events in Health-Related Social Discourse
Sharif, O., Basak, M., Parvin, T., Scharfstein, A., Bradham, A., Borodovsky, J. T., Lord, S., & Preum, S. M. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30241 · Cited by 7
Video Question Generation for Dynamic Changes
Xie, J., Chen, J., Liu, Z., Cai, Y., Huang, Q., & Li, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3391415 · Cited by 5
EMS: Efficient and Effective Massively Multilingual Sentence Embedding Learning
Mao, Z., Chu, C., & Kurohashi, S. (2024) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2024.3402064 · Cited by 8
Vision Transformer Computation and Resilience for Dynamic Inference
Sreedhar, K., Clemons, J., Venkatesan, R., Keckler, S. W., & Horowitz, M. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS) · doi:10.1109/ispass61541.2024.00027 · Cited by 6
Multimodal Guidance Network for Missing- Modality Inference in Content Moderation
Zhao, Z., Palani, H., Liu, T., Evans, L., & Toner, R. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo workshops · doi:10.1109/icmew63481.2024.10645412 · Cited by 9
Revealing Implicit Relations in Russian Legal Texts
Devyatkin, D. A., Sofronova, A., & Yadrintsev, V. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59535-7_16 · Cited by 5
Dual Head-wise Coattention Network for Machine Comprehension with Multiple-Choice Questions
Liu, Z., Huang, K., Huang, D., Liu, Z., & Zhao, J. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3412013 · Cited by 5
Structural and Functional Decomposition for Personality Image Captioning in a Communication Game
Nguyen, M. T., Phung, D., Hoai, M., & Nguyen, T. H. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.411 · Cited by 5
Exploring Neural Entity Representations for Semantic Information
Runge, A., & Hovy, E. H. (2020) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.20 · Cited by 7
Nikas, C., Fafalios, P., & Tzitzikas, Y. (2020) · Cited by 5
SINAI at SemEval-2020 Task 12: Offensive Language Identification Exploring Transfer Learning Models
Plaza-del-Arco, F. M., Molina-González, M. D., Ureña-López, A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.211 · Cited by 5
Optimizing Small BERTs Trained for German NER
Zöllner, J., Sperfeld, K., Wick, C., & Labahn, R. (2021) · Information · doi:10.3390/info12110443 · Cited by 6
Hossain, T., Naim, J., Tasneem, F., Tasnia, R., & Chy, A. N. (2021) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.151 · Cited by 7
DistilBERT-based Argumentation Retrieval for Answering Comparative Questions
Alhamzeh, A., Bouhaouel, M., Egyed‐Zsigmond, E., & Mitrović, J. (2021) · HAL · Cited by 5
NoiER: An Approach for Training More Reliable Fine-Tuned Downstream Task Models
Jang, M., & Lukasiewicz, T. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3193292 · Cited by 4
Torunoğlu-Selamet, D., İnceoğlu, A., & Eryiğit, G. (2020) · International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) · doi:10.1109/ubmk50275.2020.9219389 · Cited by 5
PatentTransformer-2: Controlling Patent Text Generation by Structural MetadataPreprint
Lee, J.-S., & Hsiang, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.03708 · Cited by 11
MicroNet for Efficient Language ModelingPreprint
Yan, Z., Wang, H., Guo, D., & Han, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.07877 · Cited by 6
T-VSE: Transformer-Based Visual Semantic EmbeddingPreprint
Baştan, M., Arnau Ramisa, A., & Tek, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.08399 · Cited by 4
Surprisal-Triggered Conditional Computation with Neural NetworksPreprint
Lugosch, L., Nowrouzezahrai, D., & Meyer, B. H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.01659 · Cited by 9
Deep Contextual Embeddings for Address Classification in E-commercePreprint
Mangalgi, S., Kumar, L., & Tallamraju, R. B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.03020 · Cited by 15
Pay Attention when RequiredPreprint
Mandava, S., Migacz, S., & Fit-Florea, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.04534 · Cited by 8
Cross-lingual Word Sense Disambiguation using mBERT Embeddings with Syntactic DependenciesPreprint
Zhu, X. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.05300 · Cited by 7
Self-Supervised VQA: Answering Visual Questions using Images and Captions.Preprint
Banerjee, P., Gokhale, T., Yang, Y., & Baral, C. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Liu, H., Soto, R. R., Xiao, F., & Lee, Y. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Zero-shot Generalization in Dialog State Tracking through Generative Question AnsweringPreprint
Li, S. X., Cao, J. L., Sridhar, M., Zhu, H., Li, S.-W. D., Hamza, W., & McAuley, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.08333 · Cited by 5
LightMBERT: A Simple Yet Effective Method for Multilingual BERT DistillationPreprint
Jiao, X., Yin, Y., Shang, L., Jiang, X., Chen, X. D., Li, L., Wang, F., & Liu, Q. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.06418 · Cited by 14
BitTensor: A Peer-to-Peer Intelligence MarketPreprint
Rao, Y., Steeves, J., Shaabana, A., Attevelt, D., & McAteer, M. I. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.03917 · Cited by 25
A Neighbourhood Framework for Resource-Lean Content FlaggingPreprint
Sarwar, S. M., Zlatkova, D., Hardalov, M., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.17055 · Cited by 5
Becker, M., Korfhage, K., Paul, D., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.03157 · Cited by 5
On the Expressive Power of Self-Attention MatricesPreprint
Likhosherstov, V., Choromański, K., & Weller, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.03764 · Cited by 49
Towards Explainable Fact CheckingPreprint
Augenstein, I. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.10274 · Cited by 15
Cahyawijaya, S. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.14711/thesis-991012980421703412 · Cited by 10
PyTorrent: A Python Library Corpus for Large-scale Language ModelsPreprint
Bahrami, M., Shrikanth, N. C., Ruangwan, S., Liu, L., Mizobuchi, Y., Fukuyori, M., Chen, W., Munakata, K., & Menzies, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.01710 · Cited by 18
Redesigning the Transformer Architecture with Insights from Multi-particle Dynamical SystemsPreprint
Dutta, S., Gautam, T., Chakrabarti, S., & Chakraborty, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.15142 · Cited by 5
Steuer, T., Filighera, A., Meuser, T., & Rensing, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.04123 · Cited by 11
Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examples through An Improved Beam Search AlgorithmPreprint
Zhao, T., Ge, Z., Hu, H., & Shi, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08036 · Cited by 5
Li, T., Rashid, A., Jafari, A., Sharma, P., Ghodsi, A., & Rezagholizadeh, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.05696 · Cited by 5
Laugwitz, L. L. (2021) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/gt28f · Cited by 6
Data Science and Machine Learning
(2022) · doi:10.5121/csit.2022.1215 · Cited by 5
Semeraro, A., Vilella, S., Mohammad, S. M., Ruffo, G., & Stella, M. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2428155/v1 · Cited by 8
LEXTREME: A Multi-Lingual and Multi-Task Benchmark for the Legal DomainPreprint
Niklaus, J., Matoshi, V., Rani, P., Galassi, A., Stuermer, M., & Chalkidis, I. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.24451/arbor.19688 · Cited by 42
Towards Automated Assessment of Scientific Explanations in Turkish using Language TransferPreprint
Nazaretsky, T., Yolcu, H. H., Ariely, M., & Alexandron, G. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/wuzy9 · Cited by 5
Detection and Classification of ChatGPT Generated Contents Using Deep Transformer ModelsPreprint
Oghaz, M. M., Dhame, K., Singaram, G., & Saheer, L. B. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23895951 · Cited by 5
Heads I Win, Tails It’s Chance: Mutual Fund Performance Self-attributionPreprint
Wang, M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4553526 · Cited by 5
Using natural language processing to extract plant functional traits from unstructured textPreprint
Domazetoski, V., Kreft, H., Bestová, H., Wieder, P., Koynov, R., Zarei, A., & Weigelt, P. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.06.565787 · Cited by 5
GenAI at the Edge: Comprehensive Survey on Empowering Edge DevicesPreprint
Navardi, M., Aalishah, R., Fu, Y., Lin, Y., Li, H., Chen, Y., & Mohsenin, T. (2025) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/jeu3u0 · Cited by 6
Rethinking Transformers for Efficiency and ScalabilityPreprint
Huang, J., & Bao, Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5161897 · Cited by 5
Textual and AI-based Analysis of Climate Disclosures: Evidence from the European Energy SectorPreprint
Chabot, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5380060 · Cited by 5
Labeed, Q., & Liang, X. (2024) · International Conference on Pattern Recognition Systems (ICPRS) · doi:10.1109/icprs62101.2024.10677817 · Cited by 5
Assessing autobiographical memory consistency: Machine and human approaches
Wardell, V., Jameson, T., Jacques, P. L. S., Madan, C. R., & Palombo, D. J. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02690-7 · Cited by 5
Comparing machine learning models with a focus on tone in grooming chat logs
Hamm, L., & McKeever, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2025.1591828 · Cited by 4
Karasenko, A., & Baier, D. (2025) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-025-01232-z · Cited by 9
Debelak, R., Koch, T. K., Aßenmacher, M., & Stachl, C. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251351285 · Cited by 5
Semantic and Precise Trigger Inversion: Detecting Backdoored Language Models
Xie, C., He, J., Yang, Y., Guo, S., Zhang, T., & Xiang, T. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3594037 · Cited by 6
Balloni, E., Pietrini, R., Sasso, M., Frontoni, E., & Paolanti, M. (2025) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2025.104454 · Cited by 5
Chen, S.-S., Pai, T., & Sun, C. (2025) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2025.104649 · Cited by 6
Artificial intelligence content detection techniques using watermarking: A survey
Kumar, N., & Singh, A. K. (2025) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2025.105728 · Cited by 4
Predicting the Quality of Revisions in Argumentative Writing
Liu, Z., Litman, D. J., Wang, E. L., Matsumura, L. C., & Correnti, R. J. (2023) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.24 · Cited by 7
Miller, K., Kshatriya, B. S. A., Núñez, N. A., Gardea‐Resendez, M., Ryu, E., Coombes, B. J., Fu, S., Frye, M. A., Biernacka, J. M., Huang, M. S., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi57859.2023.00034 · Cited by 5
Automated Assessment of Capital Allowances
Gholizadeh, J., Chun, K.-S., Curd, C., Masters, N., Gibson, D., & Li, Y. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3393830 · Cited by 4
OrderBkd: Textual Backdoor Attack Through Repositioning
Alekseevskaia, I., & Arkhipenko, K. V. (2023) · Ivannikov ISPRAS Open Conference (ISPRAS) · doi:10.1109/ispras60948.2023.10508175 · Cited by 4
Rhouma, R., McMahon, C., Mcgillivray, D., Massood, H., Kanwal, S., Khan, M., Lo, T., Lam, J., & Smith, C. (2024) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2024.101519 · Cited by 9
IoT as Wearable Device in Smart Healthcare Systems
Harshavardhanan, P., Suman, P., & Ghosh, S. S. (2024) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-2901-6.ch005 · Cited by 5
Habib, F., Ali, Z., Azam, A., Kamran, K., & Pasha, F. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1387325 · Cited by 5
Jung, H. S., Kim, J. H., & Lee, H. (2025) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.241687 · Cited by 4
Improving Paragraph Similarity by Sentence Interaction With BERT
Jin, X. (2025) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.70003 · Cited by 6
AUTOMATED DETECTION OF EMOTION IN CENTRAL BANK COMMUNICATION: A WARNING
Baerg, N. R., & Binder, C. C. (2024) · National Institute Economic Review · doi:10.1017/nie.2024.31 · Cited by 4
Leveraging Sentiment Analysis for Enhanced Customer Experience
Biyaali, M. K. E., Boudri, R., & Bentalha, B. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0918-7.ch007 · Cited by 4
Exploring Religions and Cross-Cultural Sensitivities in Conversational AI
Shuvo, M. R., Debnath, R., Hasan, N., Nazara, R., Rahman, F. N., Riad, M. J. A., & Roy, P. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering (AIDE) · doi:10.1109/aide64228.2025.10987489 · Cited by 4
Sruthi, K. S., Sreekumar, A., & Balakrishnan, K. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130573 · Cited by 4
Multi-level spatiotemporal graph attention fusion for multimodal depression detection
Yang, Y., & Zheng, W. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108123 · Cited by 7
An interpretable multi-transformer ensemble for text-based movie genre classification
Shaukat, F., Ejaz, N., Ashraf, Z., Alnfiai, M. M., Alotaibi, N. N., & Alnefaie, S. M. M. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2945 · Cited by 6
Classifying Scam Calls Through Content Analysis With Dynamic Sparsity Top-k Attention Regularization
Zhi, B. H. J., Connie, T., Ong, T. S., & Teoh, A. B. J. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3582906 · Cited by 6
A Hybrid Long Short-Term Memory with a Sentiment Analysis System for Stock Market Forecasting
Liagkouras, K., & Metaxiotis, K. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14142753 · Cited by 6
Assessing BERT-based models for Arabic and low-resource languages in crime text classification
Al-harbi, N. K., & Alghieth, M. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3017 · Cited by 4
Making hierarchically aware decisions on short findings for automatic summarisation
İnan, E. (2025) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2025.102692 · Cited by 5
Doshi, T., Patel, V., Shah, N., et al. (2025) · Franklin Open · doi:10.1016/j.fraope.2025.100349 · Cited by 4
Light Pre-Trained Chinese Language Model for NLP Tasks
Li, J., Hu, H., Zhang, X., Li, M., Li, L., & Xu, L. J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60457-8_47 · Cited by 3
A Study of Using Language Models to Detect Sarcasm
Ibrahim, S. M. A., Manoharan, S., & Ye, X. (2020) · IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e) · doi:10.1109/ic3e50159.2020.9288427 · Cited by 5
Srivastava, V. P., Pilli, S., Bhat, S., Pedanekar, N., & Karande, S. S. (2021) · Workshop on Knowledge Extraction and Integration for Deep Learning Architectures: Deep Learning Inside Out (DeeLIO) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.deelio-1.12 · Cited by 4
Challenges for Information Extraction from Dialogue in Criminal Law
Hong, J., Voss, C., & Manning, C. D. (2021) · Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact (NLP4PI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nlp4posimpact-1.8 · Cited by 5
Improved Named Entity Recognition for Noisy Call Center Transcripts
Davidson, S. R., Hosier, J., Zhou, Y., & Gurbani, V. K. (2021) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.wnut-1.40 · Cited by 5
A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Western and Hong Kong–based Reporting on the 2019–2020 Protests
McCarthy, A. D., Scharf, J. A., & Dore, G. M. D. (2021) · Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature (LaTeCH-CLfL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.latechclfl-1.20 · Cited by 4
A Dataset for Detecting Humor in Telugu Social Media Text
Bellamkonda, S., Lohakare, M., & Patel, S. P. (2022) · Workshop on Speech, Vision, and Language Technologies for Dravidian Languages (DravidianLangTech) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.dravidianlangtech-1.2 · Cited by 5
Psycholinguistic Diagnosis of Language Models’ Commonsense Reasoning
Cong, Y. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.csrr-1.3 · Cited by 4
Natural Language Interfaces to Data
Quamar, A., Efthymiou, V., Lei, C., & Özcan, F. (2022) · doi:10.1561/9781638280293 · Cited by 4
Enhancing Distributed In-Situ CNN Inference in the Internet of Things
Du, J., Du, Y., Huang, D., Lu, Y., & Liao, X. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3176408 · Cited by 4
Multilingual Transformers for Product Matching – Experiments and a New Benchmark in Polish
Możdżonek, M., Wróblewska, A., Tkachuk, S., & Łukasik, S. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) · doi:10.1109/fuzz-ieee55066.2022.9882843 · Cited by 4
Cyberbullying Detection using Ensemble Method
Saranyanath, K. P., Shi, W., & Corriveau, J. (2022) · International Conference on Data Science and Machine Learning (DSML) · doi:10.5121/csit.2022.121507 · Cited by 4
Transformer-Based Multilingual Language Models in Cross-Lingual Plagiarism Detection
Ter-Hovhannisyan, T., & Avetisyan, K. (2022) · Ivannikov Memorial Workshop (IVMEM) · doi:10.1109/ivmem57067.2022.9983968 · Cited by 6
MalHate : Hate Speech Detection in Malayalam Regional Language
Krishnan, R., Poornachandran, P., Sujadevi, V. G., Rajendran, G., Ks, V., Vijayan, V., & Ram, A. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE) · doi:10.1109/icraie56454.2022.10054339 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
