The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,401–2,500 of 4,692
Distributional Shift Adaptation using Domain-Specific Features
Tahir, A., Lu, C. Z., Guo, R., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020444 · Cited by 5
An Empirical Comparison of DistilBERT, Longformer and Logistic Regression for Predictive Coding
Wei, F., Yang, J., Mao, Q., Qin, H., & Dabrowski, A. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020486 · Cited by 5
A Multilingual Virtual Guide for Self-Attachment Technique
Law, A. J., Hu, R., Alazraki, L., Gopalan, A., Polydorou, N., & Edalat, A. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI) · doi:10.1109/cogmi56440.2022.00025 · Cited by 4
Rybinski, K. I. (2023) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/qae-09-2022-0171 · Cited by 5
Ajhari, A. A. (2023) · Applied Information System and Management (AISM) · doi:10.15408/aism.v6i1.26045 · Cited by 5
Multi-class categorization of reasons behind mental disturbance in long texts
Garg, M. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110742 · Cited by 6
Lightweight recurrent cross-modal encoder for video question answering
Immanuel, S. A., & Jeong, C. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110773 · Cited by 5
Assessment of Personal Values for Data-Driven Human Resource Management
Kimura, T. (2023) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2023-022 · Cited by 11
Revisiting Data Augmentation in Model Compression: An Empirical and Comprehensive Study
Yu, M., Zhang, L., & Ma, K. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191736 · Cited by 5
SPEECH: Structured Prediction with Energy-Based Event-Centric Hyperspheres
Deng, S., Mao, S., Zhang, N., & Hooi, B. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.21 · Cited by 6
NatLogAttack: A Framework for Attacking Natural Language Inference Models with Natural Logic
Zheng, Z., & Zhu, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.554 · Cited by 6
Bloom Library: Multimodal Datasets in 300+ Languages for a Variety of Downstream Tasks
Leong, C., Nemecek, J., Mansdorfer, J., Filighera, A., Owodunni, A., & Whitenack, D. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.590 · Cited by 19
Who needs context? Classical techniques for Alzheimer’s disease detection
TaghiBeyglou, B., & Rudzicz, F. (2023) · Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop (ClinicalNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.13 · Cited by 5
Training Models on Oversampled Data and a Novel Multi-class Annotation Scheme for Dementia Detection
Abdelhalim, N., Abdelhalim, I., & Batista-Navarro, R. (2023) · Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop (ClinicalNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.15 · Cited by 5
Dynamic Transformers Provide a False Sense of Efficiency
Chen, Y., Chen, S., Li, Z., Yang, W., Liu, C., Tan, R. T., & Li, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.395 · Cited by 6
ActiveAED: A Human in the Loop Improves Annotation Error Detection
Weber, L., & Plank, B. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.562 · Cited by 5
Towards Diverse and Effective Question-Answer Pair Generation from Children Storybooks
Eo, S., Moon, H., Kim, J., Hur, Y., Kim, J., Lee, S., Chun, C., Park, S. S., & Lim, H. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.380 · Cited by 6
AssistSR: Task-oriented Video Segment Retrieval for Personal AI Assistant
Lei, W., Gao, D., Wang, Y., Mao, D., Liang, Z., Ran, L., & Shou, M. Z. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.24 · Cited by 5
Can Language Models Serve as Temporal Knowledge Bases?
Zhao, R., Zhao, F., Xu, G., Zhang, S., & Jin, H. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.147 · Cited by 6
Dong, X., Guo, Q., Gan, T., Wang, Q., Wu, J., Ren, X., Cheng, Y., & Chu, W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2023.3303945 · Cited by 5
ABC-KD: Attention-Based-Compression Knowledge Distillation for Deep Learning-Based Noise Suppression
Wan, Y., Zhou, Y., Peng, X., Chang, K.-W., & Lu, Y. (2023) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2023-971 · Cited by 5
Practical Takes on Federated Learning with Pretrained Language Models
Agarwal, A., Rezagholizadeh, M., & Parthasarathi, P. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.34 · Cited by 7
Kour, H., & Gupta, M. K. (2023) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13489 · Cited by 7
BanglaGPT: A Generative Pretrained Transformer-Based Model for Bangla Language
Salim, M. S., Murad, H., Das, D., & Ahmed, F. (2023) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainable Development (ICICT4SD) · doi:10.1109/icict4sd59951.2023.10303383 · Cited by 8
SetQuence & SetOmic: Deep set transformers for whole genome and exome tumour analysis
Jurenaite, N., León-Periñán, D., Donath, V., Torge, S., & Jäkel, R. (2023) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.105095 · Cited by 5
Cong, Y., Chersoni, E., Hsu, Y.-Y., & Blache, P. (2023) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.17 · Cited by 5
Cross-lingual Transfer Can Worsen Bias in Sentiment Analysis
Goldfarb-Tarrant, S., Roß, B., & Lopez, A. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.346 · Cited by 13
PR-MCS: Perturbation Robust Metric for MultiLingual Image Captioning
Kim, Y., Hwang, Y., Yun, H., Yoon, S., Bui, T., & Jung, K. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.819 · Cited by 6
Uni-NLX: Unifying Textual Explanations for Vision and Vision-Language Tasks
Sammani, F., & Deligiannis, N. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw60793.2023.00498 · Cited by 5
System-on-Chip Message Flow Mining with Masked-Language Models
Ahmed, M. R., Nadimi, B., & Zheng, H. (2023) · IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS) · doi:10.1109/mwscas57524.2023.10406038 · Cited by 5
Reliable Hardware Watermarks for Deep Learning Systems
Clements, J., & Lao, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2024.3360240 · Cited by 5
Breaking News System of At-Bat Results From Sports Commentary via Speech Recognition
Ikeda, R., Sakamoto, K., & Ueda, Y. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3365948 · Cited by 5
Rigutini, L., Globo, A., Stefanelli, M., Zugarini, A., Gültekin, S., & Ernandes, M. (2024) · International Journal on Natural Language Computing · doi:10.5121/ijnlc.2024.13102 · Cited by 6
Detecting Check-Worthy Claims in Political Debates, Speeches, and Interviews Using Audio Data
Ivanov, P., Koychev, I. K., Hardalov, M., & Nakov, P. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10447064 · Cited by 9
Xue, H., Yang, S., Zhang, Z., Wu, Z., Li, M., Dai, Z., & Meng, H. M. L. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10448208 · Cited by 8
A simple and efficient dialogue generation model incorporating commonsense knowledge
Son, G., & Kim, M. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123584 · Cited by 6
Semanformer: Semantics-aware Embedding Dimensionality Reduction Using Transformer-Based Models
Boyapati, M., & Aygün, R. S. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc59802.2024.00027 · Cited by 9
Novel Uncertainty Quantification Through Perturbation-Assisted Sample Synthesis
Liu, Y., Shen, R., & Shen, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3393364 · Cited by 7
Optimizing Pre-trained Language Models for Efficient Vulnerability Detection in Code Snippets
Su, J., & Wu, Y. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/iccc59590.2023.10507456 · Cited by 7
Public perception of psychiatry, psychology and mental health professionals: a 15-year analysis
Domingo-Espiñeira, J., Varaona, A., Montero, M., Lara-Abelenda, F. J., Gutiérrez-Rojas, L., Ameyugo, E., Rodríguez–Jiménez, R., da Costa, M. P., Ortega, M. A., Álvarez-Mon, M. Á., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1369579 · Cited by 8
Tan, Y., Liu, Q., Liu, T., Liu, H., Wang, S.-M., & Chen, Z. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14104259 · Cited by 5
From Deep Neural Language Models to LLMs
Kucharavy, A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54827-7_1 · Cited by 5
Self-Adaptive Named Entity Recognition by Retrieving Unstructured Knowledge
Nishida, K., Yoshinaga, N., & Nishida, K. (2024) · Journal of Natural Language Processing · doi:10.5715/jnlp.31.407 · Cited by 6
Bensalah, N., Ayad, H., Adib, A., & Farouk, A. I. E. (2024) · International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics · doi:10.1108/ijicc-03-2024-0106 · Cited by 5
Alhayan, F., Himdi, H., & Alharbi, B. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3424531 · Cited by 7
User Engagement Triggers in Social Media Discourse on Biodiversity Conservation
Dethlefs, N., & Cuayáhuitl, H. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3662685 · Cited by 5
Multi-Task Multi-Modal Self-Supervised Learning for Facial Expression Recognition
Halawa, M., Blume, F., Bideau, P., Maier, M., Rahman, R. A., & Hellwich, O. (2024) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw63382.2024.00463 · Cited by 9
ClassTer: Mobile Shift-Robust Personalized Federated Learning via Class-Wise Clustering
Li, X., Liu, S., Zhou, Z., Yuan, X., Guo, B., & Yu, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2024.3487294 · Cited by 5
Bodaghi, A., Fung, B. C. M., & Schmitt, K. (2024) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3700791 · Cited by 8
Interpretation of Myers–Briggs Type Indicator personality profiles based on ambivert continuum scale
Butt, S., Sidorov, G., & Gelbukh, A. F. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125689 · Cited by 8
Issue detection and prioritization based on mobile application reviews
de Lima, V. M. A., Barbosa, J. R., & Marcacini, R. M. (2024) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1007/s11219-024-09703-2 · Cited by 7
Explainability of Network Intrusion Detection Using Transformers: A Packet-Level Approach
RajkumarDheivanayahi, P., Berry, R., Costagliola, N. U., Fiondella, L., Bastian, N. D., & Kul, G. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3525008 · Cited by 5
Unified Embedding Based Personalized Retrieval in Etsy Search
Jha, R., Subramaniyam, S., Benjamin, E., & Taula, T. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Future Machine Learning and Data Science (FMLDS) · doi:10.1109/fmlds63805.2024.00055 · Cited by 9
When Federated Learning Meets Knowledge Distillation to Secure Consumer Edge Network
Houda, Z. A. E., Moudoud, H., & Brik, B. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3559004 · Cited by 5
Meme Similarity and Emotion Detection using Multimodal Analysis
Konyspay, A., Shamoi, P., Ziyada, M., & Smambayev, Z. (2025) · International Conference on Activity and Behavior Computing (ABC) · doi:10.1109/abc64332.2025.11118558 · Cited by 8
Design Patterns for Resource-Constrained Automated Deep-Learning Methods
Tuggener, L., Amirian, M., Benites, F., von Däniken, P., Gupta, P., Schilling, F.-P., & Stadelmann, T. (2020) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai1040031 · Cited by 7
Deep Learning Systems: Algorithms, Compilers, and Processors for Large-Scale Production
Rodríguez, A. (2020) · Synthesis lectures on computer architecture · doi:10.2200/s01046ed1v01y202009cac053 · Cited by 5
Cloze Distillation Improves Psychometric Predictive Power
Eisape, T., Zaslavsky, N., & Lévy, R. (2020) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · Cited by 5
Don’t Read Too Much Into It: Adaptive Computation for Open-Domain Question Answering
Wu, Y., Riedel, S., Minervini, P., & Stenetorp, P. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.244 · Cited by 5
Frugal neural reranking: evaluation on the Covid-19 literature
de Almeida, T. D., & Matos, S. (2020) · Workshop on NLP for COVID-19 (NLP-COVID19) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcovid19-2.3 · Cited by 4
Chia, Y. K., Witteveen, S., & Andrews, M. (2020) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.textgraphs-1.14 · Cited by 5
Doping: A technique for Extreme Compression of LSTM Models using Sparse Structured Additive Matrices
Thakker, U., Whatmough, P. N., Liu, Z. G., Mattina, M., & Beu, J. G. (2021) · Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems · Cited by 5
Context, Language Modeling, and Multimodal Data in Finance
Das, S. R., Goggins, C., He, J., Karypis, G., Krishnamurthy, S., Mahajan, M., Prabhala, N. R., Slack, D., van Dusen, R., Yue, S., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Financial Data Science · doi:10.3905/jfds.2021.1.063 · Cited by 5
Automated Scoring of Tablet-Administered Expressive Language Tests
Gale, R. C., Bird, J., Wang, Y., van Santen, J. P. H., Prud’hommeaux, E. T., Dolata, J. K., & Asgari, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668401 · Cited by 8
An Overview of Uncertainty Calibration for Text Classification and the Role of Distillation
Guo, H., Pasunuru, R., & Bansal, M. (2021) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.repl4nlp-1.29 · Cited by 5
Benlahbib, A., Alami, A., & Alami, H. (2021) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.116 · Cited by 5
Distiller: A Systematic Study of Model Distillation Methods in Natural Language Processing
He, H., Shi, X., Mueller, J. W., Zha, S., Li, M., & Karypis, G. (2021) · Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.sustainlp-1.13 · Cited by 8
Comparing Traditional and Neural Approaches for Detecting Health-Related Misinformation
Fernández-Pichel, M., Losada, D. E., Pichel, J. C., & Elsweiler, D. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85251-1_7 · Cited by 4
Synerise at RecSys 2021: Twitter user engagement prediction with a fast neural model
Daniluk, M., Dabrowski, J., Rychalska, B., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3487572.3487599 · Cited by 5
RefBERT: Compressing BERT by Referencing to Pre-computed Representations
Wang, X., Yang, H., Zhao, L., Mo, Y., & Shen, J. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9534402 · Cited by 5
Accelerating Pretrained Language Model Inference Using Weighted Ensemble Self-distillation
Kong, J., Wang, J., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88480-2_18 · Cited by 5
CrisisFlow: Multimodal Representation Learning Workflow for Crisis Computing
Krawczuk, P., Nagarkar, S., & Deelman, E. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on eScience · doi:10.1109/escience51609.2021.00052 · Cited by 5
E-BART: Jointly Predicting and Explaining Truthfulness.
Brand, E., Roitero, K., Soprano, M., & Demartini, G. (2021) · Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) · Cited by 5
Zhang, D. Y., Hueser, J., Li, Y., & Campbell, S. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671571 · Cited by 6
Zhu, X., Gu, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.799349 · Cited by 5
Locally Aggregated Feature Attribution on Natural Language Model Understanding
Zhang, S., Wang, J., Jiang, H., & Song, R. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.159 · Cited by 5
Sublinear Time Approximation of Text Similarity Matrices
Ray, A., Monath, N., McCallum, A., & Musco, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i7.20779 · Cited by 5
Job and Employee Embeddings: A Joint Deep Learning Approach
Liu, H., & Ge, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3180593 · Cited by 5
Using NLP to quantify the environmental cost and diversity benefits of in-person NLP conferences
Przybyła, P., & Shardlow, M. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.304 · Cited by 5
Multi-stage Progressive Compression of Conformer Transducer for On-device Speech Recognition
Rathod, J., Dawalatabad, N., Singh, S., & Gowda, D. (2022) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2022-10582 · Cited by 5
Gain more with less: Extracting information from business documents with small data
Nguyen, M.-T., Sơn, N. H., & Le, L. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119274 · Cited by 5
Enhanced Multi-Domain Dialogue State Tracker With Second-Order Slot Interactions
Jiao, F., Guo, Y., Huang, M., & Nie, L. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3221044 · Cited by 5
TINA: Textual Inference with Negation Augmentation
Helwe, C., Coumes, S., Clavel, C., & Suchanek, F. M. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.301 · Cited by 6
Ask It Right! Identifying Low-Quality questions on Community Question Answering Services
Arora, U., Goyal, N. P., Goel, A., Sachdeva, N., & Kumaraguru, P. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892454 · Cited by 5
Legal Document Clustering and Summarization
Rao, A., Halgekar, A., Khankhoje, D., et al. (2022) · International Conference on Computing Communication Control and automation · doi:10.1109/iccubea54992.2022.10010585 · Cited by 5
Bruch, S., Lucchese, C., & Nardini, F. M. (2022) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3582900.3582916 · Cited by 5
Nordic Artificial Intelligence Research and Development
Zouganeli, E., Yazidi, A., Mello, G. B. M. E., & Lind, P. G. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17030-0 · Cited by 6
Weissenbacher, D., O’Connor, K., Rawal, S., Zhang, Y., Tsai, R. T., Miller, T. A., Xu, D., Anderson, C., Лю, Б., Han, Q., et al. (2023) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baac108 · Cited by 7
Feature structure distillation with Centered Kernel Alignment in BERT transferring
Jung, H.-J., Kim, D., Na, S., & Kim, K. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120980 · Cited by 5
Validity Assessment of Legal Will Statements as Natural Language Inference
Kwak, A. S., Israelsen, J. O., Morrison, C. T., Bambauer, D. E., & Surdeanu, M. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.447 · Cited by 6
Effective Pretraining Objectives for Transformer-based Autoencoders
Liello, L. D., Gabburo, M., & Moschitti, A. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.405 · Cited by 7
A Study on Knowledge Distillation from Weak Teacher for Scaling Up Pre-trained Language Models
Lee, H., Hou, R., Kim, J., Liang, D., Hwang, S. J., & Min, A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.714 · Cited by 13
Click: Controllable Text Generation with Sequence Likelihood Contrastive Learning
Zheng, C., Ke, P., Zhang, Z., & Huang, M. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.65 · Cited by 27
End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems Based on Schema
Imrattanatrai, W., & Fukuda, K. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.645 · Cited by 5
Bias Beyond English: Counterfactual Tests for Bias in Sentiment Analysis in Four Languages
Goldfarb-Tarrant, S., Lopez, A., Blanco, R., & Marcheggiani, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.272 · Cited by 7
Distill or Annotate? Cost-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Compact Models
Kang, J., Xu, W. H., & Ritter, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.622 · Cited by 11
PreQuant: A Task-agnostic Quantization Approach for Pre-trained Language Models
Gong, Z., Liu, J., Wang, Q., Yang, Y., Wang, J., Wu, W., Xian, Y., Zhao, D., & Yan, R. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.511 · Cited by 9
Burdisso, S., Zuluaga-gomez, J. P., Villatoro-Tello, E., Fajčík, M., Singh, M., Smrž, P., & Motlíček, P. (2022) · Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.case-1.9 · Cited by 5
Federated Model Decomposition with Private Vocabulary for Text Classification
Zhang, Z., Hu, X., Qu, L., Wang, Q., & Xu, Z. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.430 · Cited by 5
Intriguing Properties of Compression on Multilingual Models
Ogueji, K., Ahia, O., Onilude, G., Gehrmann, S., Hooker, S., & Kreutzer, J. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.619 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
