The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,601–2,700 of 4,692
A Novel Framework for Constructing Multimodal Knowledge Graph from MuSe-CaR Video Reviews
Usmani, A., Alsamhi, S. H., Breslin, J. G., & Curry, E. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc56153.2023.00066 · Cited by 5
Qbias - A Dataset on Media Bias in Search Queries and Query Suggestions
Haak, F., & Schaer, P. (2023) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3578503.3583628 · Cited by 4
Extracting Linguistic Signal From Item Text and Its Application to Modeling Item Characteristics
Yaneva, V., Baldwin, P., Ha, L. A., & Runyon, C. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003278658-14 · Cited by 4
A Format-sensitive BERT-based Approach to Resume Segmentation
Espinal, A., Haralambous, Y., Bedart, D., & Puentes, J. (2023) · Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT) · doi:10.23919/fruct58615.2023.10143072 · Cited by 4
An Inferential Commonsense-Driven Framework for Predicting Political Bias in News Headlines
Swati, S., Mladenić, D., & Grobelnik, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3298877 · Cited by 5
Saravanan, V., & Wilson, S. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.225 · Cited by 4
Honey, I Shrunk the Language: Language Model Behavior at Reduced Scale.
Deshpande, V., Pechi, D., Thatte, S., Lialin, V., & Rumshisky, A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.326 · Cited by 7
Purificato, A., & Roberto Navigli, A. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.51 · Cited by 4
A Weakly Supervised Classifier and Dataset of White Supremacist Language
Yoder, M. M., Diab, A., Brown, D., & Carley, K. M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.17 · Cited by 5
Azimuth: Systematic Error Analysis for Text Classification
Gauthier-melancon, G., Ayala, O. M., Brin, L., Tyler, C., Branchaud-Charron, F., Marinier, J., Grande, K., & Le, D. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-demos.30 · Cited by 5
Unifying Data Perspectivism and Personalization: An Application to Social Norms
Plepi, J., Neuendorf, B., Flek, L., & WELCH, C. A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.500 · Cited by 7
Knowledge Transfer from Answer Ranking to Answer Generation
Gabburo, M., Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Garg, S., Soldaini, L., & Moschitti, A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.645 · Cited by 5
Valizadeh, M., Qian, X., Ranjbar-Noiey, P., Caragea, C., & Parde, N. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.86 · Cited by 4
kogito: A Commonsense Knowledge Inference Toolkit
Ismayilzada, M., & Bosselut, A. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-demo.12 · Cited by 7
Implicit Temporal Reasoning for Evidence-Based Fact-Checking
Allein, L., Saelens, M., Cartuyvels, R., & Moens, M. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.13 · Cited by 6
Toward Connecting Speech Acts and Search Actions in Conversational Search Tasks
Ghosh, S., Ghosh, S., & Shah, C. S. (2023) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1109/jcdl57899.2023.00027 · Cited by 6
Enhanced Word-Unit Broad Learning System With Sememes
Jiang, Y., Lu, J., Li, T., & Lv, W. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3322439 · Cited by 4
Improving Question Intent Identification by Exploiting Its Synergy With User Age
Díaz, O., & Figueroa, A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3322457 · Cited by 4
Modular Learning: Agile Development of Robust Traffic Sign Recognition
Lin, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2023.3322407 · Cited by 4
Jahromi, A. N., Pourjafari, E., Karimipour, H., Satpathy, A., & Hodge, L. (2023) · Journal of Advances in Information Technology · doi:10.12720/jait.14.5.1056-1062 · Cited by 5
NepaliBERT: Pre-training of Masked Language Model in Nepali Corpus
Pudasaini, S., Shakya, S., Tamang, A., Adhikari, S., Thapa, S., & Lamichhane, S. (2023) · International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC) · doi:10.1109/i-smac58438.2023.10290690 · Cited by 6
Toward training NLP models to take into account privacy leakages
Berthelier, G., Boutet, A., & Richard, A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386735 · Cited by 5
Chaudhari, J. N., Galiyawala, H. J., Kuribayashi, M., Sharma, P., & Raval, M. S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3337108 · Cited by 4
Li, D., Li, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0141107 · Cited by 5
Seth, P., Goel, R., Mathur, K., & Vemulapalli, S. (2023) · Workshop on Bangla Language Processing (BLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.banglalp-1.40 · Cited by 4
Narrative Style and the Spread of Health Misinformation on Twitter
Ganti, A., Hussein, E., Wilson, S., Ma, Z., & Zhao, X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.282 · Cited by 6
Cowap, A., Graham, Y., & Foster, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.665 · Cited by 4
DiFair: A Benchmark for Disentangled Assessment of Gender Knowledge and Bias
Zakizadeh, M., Miandoab, K. E., & Pilehvar, M. T. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.127 · Cited by 6
Liu, J., Liu, J., Wang, Q., Wang, J., Cai, X., Zhao, D., Wang, R., & Yan, R. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.578 · Cited by 4
Tiny Language Models Enriched with Multimodal Knowledge from Multiplex Networks
Fields, C., Natouf, O., McMains, A., Henry, C., & Kennington, C. (2023) · BabyLM Challenge · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.3 · Cited by 4
Hop, Union, Generate: Explainable Multi-hop Reasoning without Rationale Supervision
Zhao, W., Chiu, J., Cardie, C., & Rush, A. M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.1001 · Cited by 8
Automatic Transcription of Handwritten Old Occitan Language
Arias, E. G., Pai, V., Schöffel, M., Heumann, C., & Aßenmacher, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.953 · Cited by 5
Explanation Guided Knowledge Distillation for Pre-trained Language Model Compression
Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Sui, D., Ju, Y., Zhao, J., & Liu, K. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3639364 · Cited by 5
Topic and Sentiment Analysis of Reddit’s Vaping-Cessation Community
Choi, J., & Jang, H. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm58861.2023.10385341 · Cited by 4
An Empirical Analysis of Text Segmentation for BERT Classification in Extended Documents
Yang, J., Wei, F., Huber-Fliflet, N., Dabrowski, A., Mao, Q., & Qin, H. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386783 · Cited by 6
Matin, A., Khandelwal, P., Pallickara, S., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386179 · Cited by 4
Anaphoric Ambiguity Resolution in Software Requirement Texts
Jafari, S. M., Yıldırım, S., Çevik, M., & Basar, A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386192 · Cited by 4
Transformer-Based Model for Malicious URL Classification
Do, N. Q., Selamat, A., Lim, K. C., Krejcar, O., & Ghani, N. A. M. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computing (ICOCO) · doi:10.1109/icoco59262.2023.10397705 · Cited by 4
DQMix-BERT: Distillation-aware Quantization with Mixed Precision for BERT Compression
Tan, Y., Jiang, L., Chen, P., & Tong, C. (2023) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc53992.2023.10394642 · Cited by 4
Arnob, S. S., Shikder, M. A. A., Ovey, T. A., Rhythm, E. R., & Rasel, A. A. (2023) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit60459.2023.10441156 · Cited by 4
Keep Knowledge in Perception: Zero-Shot Image Aesthetic Assessment
Wang, G., Tan, Y., Lin, H., & Zhang, C. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10447301 · Cited by 4
Voice Toxicity Detection Using Multi-Task Learning
Nandwana, M. K., He, Y., Liu, J., Yu, X., Shang, C., Bois, E. D., McGuire, M., & Bhat, K. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10448289 · Cited by 4
Deceiving Deep Learning-based Fraud SMS Detection Models through Adversarial Attacks
Bajaj, A., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2023) · International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS) · doi:10.1109/sitis61268.2023.00059 · Cited by 4
No Head Left Behind – Multi-Head Alignment Distillation for Transformers
Zhao, T., Singh, K. Y., Appalaraju, S., Tang, P., Mahadevan, V., Manmatha, R., & Wu, Y. N. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i7.28583 · Cited by 6
A flexible BERT model enabling width- and depth-dynamic inference
Hu, T., Meinel, C., & Yang, H. (2024) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2024.101646 · Cited by 4
Aishwarya, S. D. G. (2024) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/sr24419013403 · Cited by 4
Enhancing Sentiment Analysis of Persian Tweets: A Transformer-Based Approach
Vakili, Y. Z., Fallah, A., & Zakeri, S. (2024) · International Conference on Web Research (ICWR) · doi:10.1109/icwr61162.2024.10533353 · Cited by 4
Farea, A., & Emmert‐Streib, F. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.15642 · Cited by 5
Overview of Existing LLM Families
Kucharavy, A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54827-7_3 · Cited by 4
Adapting LLMs to Downstream Applications
Kucharavy, A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54827-7_2 · Cited by 5
Selah, K., Gustafsson, H., Morton, H. E., Sims, Z., Peris, T. S., Karalunas, S. L., & Nigg, J. T. (2024) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-024-01217-6 · Cited by 4
Recent Advances in Large Language Models: An Upshot
Rithika, R. (2024) · International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews · doi:10.55248/gengpi.5.0624.1403 · Cited by 5
DP-FFN: Block-Based Dynamic Pooling for Accelerating Feed-Forward Layers in Transformers
Tang, J., Wang, S., Chen, S., & Kang, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings · doi:10.1109/iscas58744.2024.10558119 · Cited by 4
Mouyassir, K., Fathi, A., & Assad, N. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2024.0150654 · Cited by 7
Email Spam Classification using DistilBERT
Rosario, V. I. D., Fernandez, B. D. P., & Padilla, D. A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM) · doi:10.1109/hnicem60674.2023.10589211 · Cited by 4
Joint Dual Feature Distillation and Gradient Progressive Pruning for BERT compression
Zhang, Z., Lu, Y., Wang, T., Wei, X., & Wei, Z. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106533 · Cited by 4
Adding compact parameter blocks to multimodal transformers to detect harmful memes
Hermida, P., & Santos, E. M. D. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109136 · Cited by 4
DSG-KD: Knowledge Distillation From Domain-Specific to General Language Models
Cho, S., Jeon, J., Lee, D., Lee, C., & Kim, J. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3457850 · Cited by 6
An Approach for Business Email Compromise Detection using NLP and Deep Learning
Alguliyev, R. M., Aliguliyev, R. M., & Sukhostat, L. V. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT) · doi:10.1109/aict61888.2024.10740431 · Cited by 6
Sentiment Analysis of Movie Reviews in Regional Language: Kannada
Babu, P. K., Shruti, J. R., K, H., Dandekar, A., & Singh, S. (2024) · International Conference on Circuits, Control, Communication and Computing (I4C) · doi:10.1109/i4c62240.2024.10748497 · Cited by 4
D₂X: Depression Detection System Through X Using Hybrid Machine Learning
Angskun, T., Tipprasert, S., Thippongtorn, A., & Angskun, J. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3502241 · Cited by 4
Virtual Machine Proactive Fault Tolerance Using Log-Based Anomaly Detection
Senevirathne, P., Cooray, S., Herath, J. D., & Fernando, D. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3506833 · Cited by 6
SARCOVID: A Framework for Sarcasm Detection in Tweets Using Hybrid Transfer Learning Techniques
Balaji, T., Bablani, A., Sreeja, S. R., & Misra, H. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-78195-7_1 · Cited by 4
On the Analysis of a BERT-based Domain-Specific Question Answering Models for Indian Legal System
Shah, N., Thakkar, H. K., & Mewada, H. K. (2024) · International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT) · doi:10.1109/isaect64333.2024.10799776 · Cited by 4
Deng, J., Wu, Y., Yesha, Y., & Nguyen, P. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822229 · Cited by 4
Shu, K., Jia, Y., Zhang, Z., & Gao, J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822532 · Cited by 4
Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Compliance Checks
Bell, T., Leonhard, D., Bashir, A. H., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825159 · Cited by 4
Exploring Query Understanding for Amazon Product Search
Luo, C., Tang, X., Lu, H., Xie, Y., Liu, H., Dai, Z., Cui, L., Joshi, A., Nag, S., Li, Y., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10826015 · Cited by 4
DP-Prune: Global Optimal Strategy for Retraining-Free Pruning of Transformer Models
Yao, G., Zhang, L., Zhu, S., & Qi, M. (2024) · IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference · doi:10.1109/ipccc59868.2024.10850369 · Cited by 4
Xu, S., He, H., Mihaljević, M. J., Zhang, S., Shao, W., & Wang, Q. (2025) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110096 · Cited by 5
The Magnitude of Triggering Events and the Nonlinear Dynamics of Ethnic and Religious Upheavals
Schulte, F., & Trinn, C. (2025) · Conflict Resolution Quarterly · doi:10.1002/crq.21478 · Cited by 4
Ziaee, A., & Suter, G. (2025) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106237 · Cited by 7
Exploring the potential of online social listening for noncommunicable disease monitoring
Braga, D., da Silva, I. S., Rosario, R. V., Nováis, P., Peixoto, H., & Machado, J. M. (2025) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.19311 · Cited by 4
Enhancing Iot Intrusion Detection With Transformer-Based Network Traffic Classification
AboulEla, S., & Kashef, R. F. (2025) · IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon) · doi:10.1109/syscon64521.2025.11014861 · Cited by 6
Semantically Encoding Activity Labels for Context-Aware Human Activity Recognition
Ge, W., Mou, G., Agu, E., & Lee, K. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications · doi:10.1109/percom64205.2025.00039 · Cited by 4
Optimizing Deep Learning Models to Address Class Imbalance in Code Comment Classification
Mock, M., Borsani, T., Fatta, G. D., & Russo, B. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Natural Language-Based Software Engineering (NLBSE) · doi:10.1109/nlbse66842.2025.00016 · Cited by 4
Changing meaning of the rule of law
Kantorowicz, J., & González‐Bustamante, B. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-025-09468-4 · Cited by 4
Fayyaz, Z., Righetti, F., Wiskott, L., & Werning, M. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2522966 · Cited by 4
MWPD2020: Semantic Web Challenge on Mining the Web of HTML-embedded Product Data.
Zhang, Z., Bizer, C., Peeters, R., & Primpeli, A. (2020) · MADOC (University of Mannheim) · Cited by 4
On the Impact of Predicate Complexity in Crowdsourced Classification Tasks
Ramírez, J., Báez, M., Casati, F., Cernuzzi, L., Benatallah, B., Александровна, Т. Е., & Маланина, В. А. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3437963.3441831 · Cited by 4
Pawate, A. G., Madhavan, V., & Chandak, D. (2020) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.textgraphs-1.12 · Cited by 4
Deep Neural Query Understanding System at Expedia Group
Chandrasekaran, R., Pathak, H. N., & Yano, T. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378495 · Cited by 4
Heng, J., Liu, J., & Lim, K. H. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9377865 · Cited by 5
Inteligência Artificial e os rumos do processamento do português brasileiro
Finger, M. (2021) · Estudos Avançados · doi:10.1590/s0103-4014.2021.35101.005 · Cited by 11
SAFS: Social-Article Features-Stacking Model for Fake News Detection
Wu, X., & Wang, J. (2021) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd51990.2021.9459078 · Cited by 4
Representing the Unification of Text Featurization using a Context-Free Grammar
Kilitcioglu, D., & Kadıoğlu, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17814 · Cited by 5
A Flexible Multi-Task Model for BERT Serving
Wei, T., Qi, J., & He, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.89 · Cited by 5
MedAI at SemEval-2021 Task 5: Start-to-end Tagging Framework for Toxic Spans Detection
Wang, Z., Fan, H., & Liu, J. (2021) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.30 · Cited by 4
Interaction-Based Document Matching for Implicit Search Result Diversification
Qin, X., Dou, Z., Zhu, Y., & Wen, J.-R. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88189-4_1 · Cited by 4
Li, W., Gao, S., ZHANG, J., & Guo, S.-X. (2021) · Scientific Programming · doi:10.1155/2021/5753693 · Cited by 4
Preparing Distributed Computing Operations for the HL-LHC Era With Operational Intelligence
Girolamo, A. D., Legger, F., Paparrigopoulos, P., Schovancova, J., Beermann, T. A., Boehler, M., Bonacorsi, D., Clissa, L., Decker, L., Diotalevi, T., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2021.753409 · Cited by 4
A Vietnamese Answer Extraction Model Based on PhoBERT
Nguyen, C. T., & Nguyen, D. T. (2021) · International Conference on Advanced Computing and Applications (ACOMP) · doi:10.1109/acomp53746.2021.00022 · Cited by 4
ML-Stealer: Stealing Prediction Functionality of Machine Learning Models with Mere Black-Box Access
Liu, G., Wang, S., Wan, B., Wang, Z., & Wang, C. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom53373.2021.00083 · Cited by 4
Modeling Second Language Acquisition with pre-trained neural language models
Palenzuela, A. J. J., Frăsincar, F., & Truşcǎ, M. M. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117871 · Cited by 4
BERT‐BiGRU Intelligent Classification of Metro On‐Board Equipment Faults Based on Key Layer Fusion
Liu, E., & Lin, J. (2022) · Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1155/2022/6588425 · Cited by 4
CL-NERIL: A Cross-Lingual Model for NER in Indian Languages (Student Abstract)
Prabhakar, A., Majumder, G. S., & Anand, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21652 · Cited by 4
Developing a Production System for Purpose of Call Detection in Business Phone Conversations
Khasanova, E., Hiranandani, P., Gardiner, S., Chen, C., Corston-Oliver, S. H., & Fu, X.-Y. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-industry.29 · Cited by 4
A BERT-based Idiom Detection Model
Gamage, G., Silva, D. D., Adikari, A., & Alahakoon, D. (2022) · Conference on Human System Interactions · doi:10.1109/hsi55341.2022.9869485 · Cited by 6
Study of Question Answering on Legal Software Document using BERT based models
Quevedo, E., Rahman, M., Cerny, T., Rivas, P., & Bejarano, G. (2022) · doi:10.52591/lxai202207103 · Cited by 5
Pushing the Efficiency Limit Using Structured Sparse Convolutions
Verma, V. K., Mehta, N., Si, S., Henao, R., & Carin, L. (2023) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00644 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
