The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,701–2,800 of 4,692
A Novel Review Helpfulness Measure Based on the User-Review-Item Paradigm
Pajola, L., Chen, D., Conti, M., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2023) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3585280 · Cited by 4
COVID-19 Fake News Detection using Pre-Tuned BERT-Based Transfer Learning Models
Shrivastava, P., & Sharma, D. K. (2022) · International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) · doi:10.1109/smart55829.2022.10047307 · Cited by 5
A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Movie Success from Youtube Trailer Comments
Khan, F. E., Ruhan, A. M., Shamsuddin, R., & Ashraf, F. B. (2022) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit57492.2022.10055275 · Cited by 4
A Machine Learning Approach to Government Business Process Re-engineering
Riyadi, A., Kovacs, M., Serdült, U., & Kryssanov, V. V. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) · doi:10.1109/bigcomp57234.2023.00013 · Cited by 4
Nabiilah, G. Z., & Suhartono, D. (2023) · Revue d intelligence artificielle · doi:10.18280/ria.370110 · Cited by 7
What Are You Anxious About? Examining Subjects of Anxiety during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Chen, L. L., Wilson, S. R., Lohmann, S., & Negraia, D. V. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22133 · Cited by 5
Question-Type Identification for Academic Questions in Online Learning Platform
Rabiee, A., Goel, A., D'Souza, J., & Khanwalkar, S. (2023) · International Conference on Signal, Image Processing and Multimedia (SIPM) · doi:10.5121/csit.2023.130922 · Cited by 4
Emergent Quantized Communication
Carmeli, B., Meir, R., & Belinkov, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i10.26363 · Cited by 11
Islam, M. M., Gladstone, A., & Iqbal, T. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i1.25177 · Cited by 6
Malware Detection through Contextualized Vector Embeddings
Pandya, V., & Troia, F. D. (2023) · Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Conference (SVCC) · doi:10.1109/svcc56964.2023.10165170 · Cited by 4
Zhou, W., Bras, R. J. L., & Choi, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.664 · Cited by 5
AI Coach Assist: An Automated Approach for Call Recommendation in Contact Centers for Agent Coaching
Laskar, M. T. R., Chen, C., Fu, X.-Y., Azizi, M., Bhushan, S., & Corston-Oliver, S. H. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-industry.57 · Cited by 5
Gradient-based Intra-attention Pruning on Pre-trained Language Models
Yang, Z., Cui, Y., Yao, X., & Wang, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.156 · Cited by 7
Measuring and Mitigating Local Instability in Deep Neural Networks
Datta, A., Nandi, S., Xu, J., et al. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.176 · Cited by 4
Younes, M. B., Kharabsheh, A., & Younes, M. B. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.228 · Cited by 4
Unisa at SemEval-2023 Task 3: A SHAP-based method for Propaganda Detection
Bangerter, M. L., Fenza, G., Gallo, M., et al. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.122 · Cited by 4
Knowledge Distillation based Contextual Relevance Matching for E-commerce Product Search
Liu, Z., Wang, C., Feng, H., Wu, L., & Yang, L. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-industry.5 · Cited by 10
Language as a fingerprint: Self-supervised learning of user encodings using transformers
Rocca, R., & Yarkoni, T. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.123 · Cited by 4
SMASH: Improving SMAll Language Models’ Few-SHot Ability with Prompt-Based Distillation
Wang, Y., Liu, C., Chen, K., Wang, X., & Zhao, D. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.492 · Cited by 5
PLM-based World Models for Text-based Games
Kim, M., Jung, Y., Lee, D., & Hwang, S.-W. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.86 · Cited by 4
Back to the Roots: Predicting the Source Domain of Metaphors using Contrastive Learning
Sengupta, M., Alshomary, M., & Wachsmuth, H. (2022) · Workshop on Figurative Language Processing (FigLang) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.flp-1.19 · Cited by 4
DialogConv: A Lightweight Fully Convolutional Network for Multi-view Response Selection
Liu, Y., Shi, F., Gao, W., Wang, D., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.828 · Cited by 4
Al-Sarem, M., Saeed, F., Qasem, S. N., & Albarrak, A. M. (2023) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0140705 · Cited by 5
Self supervised learning and the poverty of the stimulus
Veres, C., & Sampson, J. (2023) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2023.102208 · Cited by 4
An Empirical Study on Active Learning for Multi-label Text Classification
Wang, M., & Liu, M. (2023) · Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP (Insights) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.insights-1.12 · Cited by 4
Vote’n’Rank: Revision of Benchmarking with Social Choice Theory
Rofin, M., Mikhailov, V., Florinsky, M., Kravchenko, A., Shavrina, T., Tutubalina, E. V., Самвелович, К. Д., & Artemova, E. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.48 · Cited by 4
Deep Learning Assisted Cyber Criminal Profiling
Bokolo, B. G., Chen, L., & Liu, Q. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (BDAI) · doi:10.1109/bdai59165.2023.10257003 · Cited by 4
Predictive Food Safety Risk Monitoring
Lee, N., Vasanthakumar, U., Chen, R., Lee, C., Lam, K., Hui, S. C., Kow, R., Er, B., Fua’di, M. T., & Aung, K. T. (2023) · International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) · doi:10.1109/iciss59129.2023.10291540 · Cited by 5
Li, N., Lü, C., Zhao, L., Zhenning, T., Wang, Z., Shao, Y., & Xiaolin, G. (2023) · International Conference on Advanced Electronics, Electrical and Green Energy (AEEGE) · doi:10.1109/aeege58828.2023.00010 · Cited by 4
Detecting Text Formality: A Study of Text Classification Approaches
Dementieva, D., Babakov, N., & Panchenko, A. (2023) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-092-2_031 · Cited by 6
Studi Empiris Model BERT dan DistilBERT Analisis Sentimen pada Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia
Putri, M., Sutanto, T. E., & Inna, S. (2023) · Indonesian Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.33022/ijcs.v12i5.3445 · Cited by 10
Xia, C., Tsang, D. H. K., & Lau, V. K. N. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3335971 · Cited by 4
Exploring Multi-Model Sentiment Analysis: A Conditional-Value System
Ziaulla, M., & Biradar, A. (2023) · International Conference on Computation System and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions (CSITSS) · doi:10.1109/csitss60515.2023.10334227 · Cited by 4
PTUK-HULAT at ArAIEval Shared Task Fine-tuned Distilbert to Predict Disinformative Tweets
Jaber, A., & Martı́nez, P. (2023) · Arabic Natural Language Processing Conference (ArabicNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.arabicnlp-1.50 · Cited by 4
EffEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Efficiency for MT Evaluation Metrics
Larionov, D., Grünwald, J., Leiter, C., & Eger, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.7 · Cited by 5
This Reads Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Natural Language Processing
Fanconi, C., Vandenhirtz, M., Husmann, S., & Vogt, J. E. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.869 · Cited by 4
Beyond Good Intentions: Reporting the Research Landscape of NLP for Social Good
Adauto, F. G., Jin, Z., Schölkopf, B., Hope, T., Sachan, M., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.31 · Cited by 8
PTP: Boosting Stability and Performance of Prompt Tuning with Perturbation-Based Regularizer
Chen, L., Chen, J., Huang, H., & Cheng, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.833 · Cited by 12
A Novel Neural Ensemble Architecture for On-the-fly Classification of Evolving Text Streams
Ghahramanian, P., Bakhshi, S., Bonab, H., et al. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3639054 · Cited by 4
Propaganda Detection in Russian Telegram Posts in the Scope of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine
Vanetik, N., Litvak, M., Reviakin, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-092-2_123 · Cited by 4
From Occupations to Tasks: A New Perspective on Automatability Prediction Using BERT
Xu, D., Yang, H., Rizoiu, M.-A., & Xu, G. (2023) · International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Computing · doi:10.1109/besc59560.2023.10386407 · Cited by 5
The Performance of Machine and Deep Learning Algorithms in Detecting Fake Reviews
Sachithanandam, B., Namin, A. S., & Abri, F. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386101 · Cited by 4
Glodd, A., & Hristova, D. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.679 · Cited by 4
Effective Malicious PowerShell Scripts Detection Using DistilBERT
Benselloua, A. Y. M., Messadi, S. A., & Belfedhal, A. E. (2023) · IEEE Afro-Mediterranean Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AMCAI) · doi:10.1109/amcai59331.2023.10431513 · Cited by 4
Feature Mixing-Based Active Learning for Multi-Label Text Classification
Han, X., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Deng, C., & Feng, J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10448407 · Cited by 4
Neural Transformers for Bias Detection: Assessing Pakistani News
Ali, O., Zaland, Z., Bazai, S. U., Ghafoor, M. I., Hussain, L., & Haider, A. (2024) · International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS) · doi:10.1109/icacs60934.2024.10473263 · Cited by 4
DATA AUGMENTATION IN TEXT CLASSIFICATION WITH MULTIPLE CATEGORIES
Павлишенко, Б. М., & Stasiuk, M. (2024) · Electronics and Information Technologies · doi:10.30970/eli.25.6 · Cited by 11
Using Transformers to Classify Arabic Dialects on Social Networks
Berhoum, A., Meftah, M. C. E., Laouid, A., Chait, K., & Kara, M. (2024) · International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Systems (PAIS) · doi:10.1109/pais62114.2024.10541289 · Cited by 5
The propensity for negative media reporting of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan in Australia
Wheeler, S. A., Zuo, A., & Pickersgill, J. (2024) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103320 · Cited by 4
Decoding Cyberbullying on Social Media: A Machine Learning Exploration
Saeid, A., Kanojia, D., & Neri, F. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai59869.2024.00084 · Cited by 6
BERT-FKGC: Text-Enhanced Few-Shot Representation Learning for Knowledge Graphs
Li, J., Wang, Z., Li, L., & Zeng, D. D. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10651190 · Cited by 5
Naturally Supervised 3D Visual Grounding with Language-Regularized Concept Learners
Feng, C., Hsu, J., Liu, W., & Wu, J. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01260 · Cited by 7
Automated Scoring of Clinical Expressive Language Evaluation Tasks
Wang, Y., Prud’hommeaux, E. T., Asgari, M., & Dolata, J. K. (2020) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.bea-1.18 · Cited by 5
Unsupervised Evaluation for Question Answering with Transformers
Muttenthaler, L., Augenstein, I., & Bjerva, J. (2020) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.8 · Cited by 4
Sentence Transformers and Bayesian Optimization for Adverse Drug Effect Detection from Twitter
Gencoglu, O. (2020) · Cited by 4
Assessing the Syntactic Capabilities of Transformer-based Multilingual Language Models
Pérez-Mayos, L., García, A. T., Mille, S., & Wanner, L. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.333 · Cited by 5
Context-Aware Question-Answer for Interactive Media Experiences
Jorgensen, K., Zhao, Z., Wang, H., Wang, M., & He, Z. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences · doi:10.1145/3452918.3458795 · Cited by 5
Maia, M., Handschuh, S., & Endres, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86475-0_13 · Cited by 4
Leveraging User Comments in Tweets for Rumor Detection
Patel, S. P., Shah, B., & Kaur, P. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-2597-8_8 · Cited by 3
Injecting Descriptive Meta-Information into Pre-Trained Language Models with Hypernetworks
Duan, W., He, X., Zhou, Z., Rao, H., & Thiele, L. (2021) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-229 · Cited by 4
Design and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Credibility Assessment in Twitter
Kaufhold, M., Bayer, M., Hartung, D., & Reuter, C. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86383-8_32 · Cited by 4
Audio DistilBERT: A Distilled Audio BERT for Speech Representation Learning
Yu, F., Guo, J., Xi, W., Yang, Z., Jiang, R., & Zhang, C. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533328 · Cited by 4
Magooda, A., & Litman, D. J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.175 · Cited by 4
Shahane, A. D., Pham, D. C., Lopez, R. B., & Denny, B. T. (2021) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-021-00053-x · Cited by 4
Pablos, A. G., Pérez, N., & Cuadros, M. (2021) · IberLEF@SEPLN · Cited by 4
An Uncertainty-Aware Encoder for Aspect Detection
Nguyen, T.-N., Nguyen, K.-H., Song, Y.-I., & Cao, T. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.69 · Cited by 4
A Framework for Area-efficient Multi-task BERT Execution on ReRAM-based Accelerators
Kang, M., Shin, H., Shin, J., & Kim, L. (2021) · International Conference on Computer Aided Design · doi:10.1109/iccad51958.2021.9643471 · Cited by 4
Bayram, U. (2022) · Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi · doi:10.17671/gazibtd.949599 · Cited by 5
A Staffing Recommender System based on Domain-Specific Knowledge Graph
Wang, Y., Allouache, Y., & Joubert, C. (2021) · International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) · doi:10.1109/snams53716.2021.9732087 · Cited by 4
A Neighborhood Framework for Resource-Lean Content Flagging
Sarwar, S. M., Zlatkova, D., Hardalov, M., Dinkov, Y., Augenstein, I., & Nakov, P. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00472 · Cited by 9
SPRINT: A Unified Toolkit for Evaluating and Demystifying Zero-shot Neural Sparse Retrieval
Thakur, N., Wang, K., Gurevych, I., & Lin, J. (2023) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3539618.3591902 · Cited by 4
Stanford MLab at SemEval 2023 Task 7: Neural Methods for Clinical Trial Report NLI
Takehana, C., Lim, D., Kurtuluş, E., Iyer, R., Tanimura, E., Aggarwal, P., Cantillon, M., Yu, A., Khan, S., & Chi, N. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.245 · Cited by 4
You Can Have Your Data and Balance It Too: Towards Balanced and Efficient Multilingual Models
Limisiewicz, T., Malkin, D., & Stanovsky, G. (2023) · Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP (SIGTYP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.sigtyp-1.1 · Cited by 5
End-to-end Training For Financial Report Summarization
Quatra, M. L., & Cagliero, L. (2020) · PORTO@Iris · Cited by 4
Data mining of public opinion: An overview
Hristova, G., Bogdanova, B., & Netov, N. (2022) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0100872 · Cited by 4
Compressing Transformer-Based Semantic Parsing Models using Compositional Code Embeddings
Prakash, P., Shashidhar, S. K., Zhao, W., Rongali, S., Khan, H., & Kayser, M. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.423 · Cited by 4
A Simple but Effective BERT Model for Dialog State Tracking on Resource-Limited SystemsPreprint
Lai, T., Tran, Q. H., Bui, T., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.12995 · Cited by 4
Adelani, D. I., Hedderich, M. A., Zhu, D., Berg, E. V. D., & Klakow, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.08370 · Cited by 15
Compressed Deep Networks: Goodbye SVD, Hello Robust Low-Rank ApproximationPreprint
Tukan, M., Maalouf, A., Weksler, M., & Feldman, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.05647 · Cited by 4
Optimizing Transformers with Approximate Computing for Faster, Smaller and more Accurate NLP ModelsPreprint
Nagarajan, A., Sen, S., Stevens, J. R., & Raghunathan, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Deep Learning Meets Projective ClusteringPreprint
Maalouf, A., Lang, H., Rus, D. L., & Feldman, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04290 · Cited by 5
Enhancing the Identification of Cyberbullying through Participant RolesPreprint
Ratnayaka, G., Atapattu, T., Herath, M., Zhang, G., & Falkner, K. E. K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.06640 · Cited by 4
Automated Detection of Cyberbullying Against Women and Immigrants and Cross-domain AdaptabilityPreprint
Atapattu, T., Herath, M., Zhang, G., & Falkner, K. E. K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.02565 · Cited by 8
HBert + BiasCorp -- Fighting Racism on the WebPreprint
Onabola, O., Ma, Z., Xie, Y., Akera, B., Ibraheem, A., Xue, J., Liu, D., & Bengio, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.02242 · Cited by 6
Contextual Text Embeddings for TwiPreprint
Azunre, P., Osei, S., Addo, S. A., Adu-Gyamfi, L., Moore, S., Adabankah, B., Opoku, B., Asare-Nyarko, C., Nyarko, S., Amoaba, C., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.15963 · Cited by 9
NLP for Ghanaian LanguagesPreprint
Azunre, P., Osei, S., Addo, S. A., Adu-Gyamfi, L., Moore, S., Adabankah, B., Opoku, B., Asare-Nyarko, C., Nyarko, S., Amoaba, C., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.15475 · Cited by 17
AdvPicker: Effectively Leveraging Unlabeled Data via Adversarial Discriminator for Cross-Lingual NERPreprint
Chen, W., Jiang, H., Wu, Q., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.02300 · Cited by 4
Global Knowledge Distillation in Federated Learning.Preprint
Pan, W., & Sun, L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Uncertainty-based Query Strategies for Active Learning with Transformers.Preprint
Schröder, C., Niekler, A., & Potthast, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 6
Extracting Semantics from Maintenance RecordsPreprint
Dixit, S., Mulwad, V., & Saxena, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.05454 · Cited by 4
TrollsWithOpinion: A Dataset for Predicting Domain-specific Opinion Manipulation in Troll MemesPreprint
Suryawanshi, S., Chakravarthi, B. R., Arčan, M., Little, S., & Buitelaar, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03571 · Cited by 6
LegaLMFiT: Efficient Short Legal Text Classification with LSTM Language Model Pre-TrainingPreprint
Clavié, B., Gheewala, A., Briton, P., Alphonsus, M., Laabiyad, R., & Piccoli, F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.00993 · Cited by 9
Galke, L. P. A., & Scherp, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Towards Theme Detection in Personal Finance QuestionsPreprint
Qiu, J. X., Faulkner, A., & Ezen-Can, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.01550 · Cited by 4
Influence Patterns for Explaining Information Flow in BERTPreprint
Lu, K., Wang, Z., Mardziel, P., & Datta, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.00740 · Cited by 4
FrugalScore: Learning Cheaper, Lighter and Faster Evaluation Metricsfor Automatic Text GenerationPreprint
Eddine, M. K., Shang, G., Tixier, A. J. ‐., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08559 · Cited by 4
A Short Study on Compressing Decoder-Based Language ModelsPreprint
Li, T., Mesbahi, Y. E., Kobyzev, I., Rashid, A., Mahmud, A., Anchuri, N., Hajimolahoseini, H., Liu, Y., & Rezagholizadeh, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08460 · Cited by 22
Robustness Challenges in Model Distillation and Pruning for Natural Language UnderstandingPreprint
Du, M., Mukherjee, S., Cheng, Y., Shokouhi, M., Xia, H., & Awadallah, A. H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08419 · Cited by 4
Handshakes AI Research at CASE 2021 Task 1: Exploring different approaches for multilingual tasksPreprint
Kalyan, V., Tan, P., Tan, S., & Andrews, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.15599 · Cited by 4
Interpreting Language Models Through Knowledge Graph ExtractionPreprint
Swamy, V., Romanou, A., & Jaggi, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.08546 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
