The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,301–3,400 of 4,692
Banday, B., Thopalli, K., Islam, T. Z., et al. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888077 · Cited by 2
MLOps Tools for Deployment: A Case Study on Text Classification
Lukić, M. D., Ivković, D. S., & Poledica, A. M. (2025) · doi:10.1109/it64745.2025.10929797 · Cited by 2
Hate Speech Detection of Roman Urdu Using Transformer Models
Ullah, R., Khan, W. U., Marwat, S. N. K., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1109/icet63392.2024.10935087 · Cited by 2
A Fine-Tuned BART Pre-trained Language Model for the Indonesian Question-Answering Task
Vincentio, A. D., & Hansun, S. (2025) · Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research · doi:10.48084/etasr.9828 · Cited by 2
Enhancing pre-trained language model by answering natural questions for event extraction
Zhang, Y., & Han, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1520290 · Cited by 2
Turkish Cyberbullying Detection with Fine-Tuned Pre-Trained Language Models
Bi̇lgi̇n, M., & Bekar, B. N. (2025) · Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi · doi:10.17671/gazibtd.1528238 · Cited by 2
Kan, B., Wang, T., Zhu, H., Liang, R., Yan, E., Wang, F. L., & Hao, T. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3572452 · Cited by 2
Adaptive Sampling Technique for Building Knockoff Text Sentiment Models
Pham, X.-C., Hoang, T.-N., Do, V.-B., & Tran, C.-T. (2024) · RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies (RIVF) · doi:10.1109/rivf64335.2024.11009072 · Cited by 2
“Strongmen” Don't Redistribute: Illiberal Leaders on the Right and Worsening Economic Inequality
Schafer, D., Maerz, S. F., Schneider, C. Q., & Krasnokutskaya, A. (2025) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.9812 · Cited by 3
Challenges and Methods in Annotating Natural Speech for Neurolinguistic Research
Agmon, G., Jaeger, M., Magen, E., Pinto, D., Perelmuter, Y., Golumbic, E. Z., & Bleichner, M. G. (2025) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol.a.12 · Cited by 3
Boosting Resource-Constrained Federated Learning Systems With Guessed Updates
Boukhari, M. Y., Dhasade, A., Kermarrec, A.-M., Pires, R. P., Safsafi, O., & Sharma, R. K. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2025.3578522 · Cited by 2
Mostafa, M. S., & Islam, M. S. (2024) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit64611.2024.11021792 · Cited by 2
Code Comment Classification with Data Augmentation and Transformer-Based Models
Rahman, M., & Siddiq, M. L. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Natural Language-Based Software Engineering (NLBSE) · doi:10.1109/nlbse66842.2025.00013 · Cited by 2
Embeddings hidden layers learning for neural network compression
Hu, J. C., Cavicchioli, R., & Capotondi, A. (2025) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107794 · Cited by 2
Text Summarization with LLM: A Comparison of Transformer and Non-Transformer Models
Saini, S., Pathak, S., Singh, S., Bhardwaj, B., & Sharma, S. (2025) · International Conference on Communication, Security and Artificial Intelligence (ICCSAI) · doi:10.1109/iccsai64074.2025.11064641 · Cited by 3
AI-Powered Detection of Fraudulent Job Listings using DistilBERT and XGBoost
Shetty, K., Shetty, S. K., Sanjana, B., Murthy, A. K., Harshitha, G. M., & Prathwini, P. (2025) · International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV) · doi:10.1109/icicv64824.2025.11085449 · Cited by 2
On the Generalization and Adaptation Ability of Machine-Generated Text Detectors in Academic Writing
Liu, Y., Zhong, Z., Liao, Y., Sun, Z. T., Zheng, J., Wei, J., Gong, Q., Tong, F., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3711896.3737408 · Cited by 7
Automating translation checks of financial documents using large language models
Pielka, M., Hahnbück, M., Deußer, T., Uedelhoven, D., Chatterjee, M., Shah, V., Soliman, O. I. I., Bank, J., Das, W., Talarico, M. C., et al. (2025) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-025-09862-z · Cited by 3
A Comparative Study: Using Machine Learning and Transformers Model to Identify Spam in SMS
Atwe, L., Jazzar, M., Eleyan, A., & Bejaoui, T. (2025) · International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets) · doi:10.1109/smartnets65254.2025.11106848 · Cited by 3
NepAES: exploring the promise of automated essay scoring for Nepali essays
Poudel, S., Rauniyar, K., Acharya, A., Rashid, J., Adhikari, S., Naseem, U., & Thapa, S. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3253 · Cited by 2
Hussain, M., Chen, C., Anwar, M., Ghorashi, S. A., Ahmed, A., Malik, M. S. A., & Yamin, I. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3287 · Cited by 2
Authorship Verification with Personalized Language Models
King, M., & Cook, P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58323-1_27 · Cited by 2
Light feed-forward networks for shard selection in large-scale product search
Lin, H., Xiong, P., Zhang, D., Yang, F., Kato, R., Kumar, M., Headden, W. P., & Yin, B. (2020) · Cited by 2
Punctuation Restoration using Transformer Models for Resource-Rich and -Poor Languages
Alam, T., Khan, A., & Alam, F. (2020) · Cited by 2
Khoury, M., Dangovski, R., Ou, L., Nakov, P., Shen, Y., & Jing, L. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.640 · Cited by 2
LGPSolver - Solving Logic Grid Puzzles Automatically
Jabrayilzade, E., & Tekır, S. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.100 · Cited by 6
Inno at SemEval-2020 Task 11: Leveraging Pure Transfomer for Multi-Class Propaganda Detection
Grigorev, D., & Ivanov, V. V. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.193 · Cited by 3
An evaluation of machine learning methods for domain name classification
Garg, A., Trivedi, N., Lu, J., Eirinaki, M., Yu, B., & Olumofin, F. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9377787 · Cited by 2
EENLP: Cross-lingual Eastern European NLP Index
Tikhonov, A., Malkhasov, A., Manoshin, A., Dima, G., Cserháti, R., Asif, M. S. H., & Sárdi, M. (2022) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/3a7bdciqv9e4 · Cited by 2
Embedding Non-planar Graphs: Storage and Representation
Klisura, Ð. (2021) · doi:10.18690/978-961-286-516-0.13 · Cited by 2
Switch Point biased Self-Training: Re-purposing Pretrained Models for Code-Switching
Chopra, P., Rallabandi, S. K., Black, A. W., & Chandu, K. R. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.373 · Cited by 5
Probing Structured Pruning on Multilingual Pre-trained Models: Settings, Algorithms, and Efficiency
Li, Y., Luo, F., Xu, R., Huang, S., Huang, F., & Wang, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.130 · Cited by 2
Zhan, P., Wu, Y., Zhou, S., Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.175 · Cited by 2
Hung, C.-C., Green, T., Litschko, R., Tsereteli, T., Takeshita, S., Bombieri, M., Glavaš, G., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.mia-1.8 · Cited by 2
Sparse Distillation: Speeding Up Text Classification by Using Bigger Student Models
Ye, Q., Khabsa, M., Lewis, M., Wang, S., Ren, X., & Jaech, A. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.169 · Cited by 2
Explaining Neural NLP Models for the Joint Analysis of Open-and-Closed-Ended Survey Answers
Mosca, E., Harmann, K., Eder, T., & Groh, G. (2022) · Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing (TrustNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.trustnlp-1.5 · Cited by 3
Benchmarking Transformers-based models on French Spoken Language Understanding tasks
Cattan, O., Ghannay, S., Servan, C., & Rosset, S. (2022) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2022-385 · Cited by 4
MUX-PLMs: Pre-training Language Models with Data Multiplexing
Murahari, V., Deshpande, A., Jimenez, C., Izhak Shafran, J., Wang, M., Cao, Y., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.repl4nlp-1.17 · Cited by 2
WikiBio: a Semantic Resource for the Intersectional Analysis of Biographical Events
Stranisci, M., Damiano, R., Mensa, E., Patti, V., Radicioni, D. P., & Caselli, T. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.691 · Cited by 13
CEIA-NLP at CASE 2022 Task 1: Protest News Detection for Portuguese
Fernandes, D., Junior, A., Marques, G. F. F., Soares, A. D. S., & Filho, A. G. O. (2022) · Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.case-1.26 · Cited by 2
Aligning Word Embeddings from BERT to Vocabulary-Free Representations
Rodríguez, A., Sooksatra, K., Rivas, P., Quevedo, E., Turek, J. S., Bichler, G., Cerny, T., Giddens, L., & Petter, S. (2023) · Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing (CSCE) · doi:10.1109/csce60160.2023.00023 · Cited by 2
Hybrid Attention Distribution and Factorized Embedding Matrix in Image Captioning
Wang, J., & Feng, J. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3018546 · Cited by 3
An Empirical Study for Vietnamese Constituency Parsing with Pre-training
Tran, T.-V., Pham, X.-T., Nguyen, D.-V., et al. (2021) · RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies (RIVF) · doi:10.1109/rivf51545.2021.9642143 · Cited by 2
Chen, Y., Yang, Y., Sun, H. M., Wang, Y., Xu, Y., Shen, W., Zhou, R., Tong, Y., Bai, J., & Zhang, R. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3412688 · Cited by 3
End-to-end NLP Pipelines in Rust
Becquin, G. (2020) · Workshop for NLP Open Source Software (NLP-OSS) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nlposs-1.4 · Cited by 2
Don’t Read Too Much Into It: Adaptive Computation for Open-Domain Question Answering
Wu, Y., Minervini, P., Stenetorp, P., & Riedel, S. (2020) · Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.sustainlp-1.9 · Cited by 2
Text Editing for Augmented Distilled BERT
Wei, S., Yu, D., & Lv, C. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai50040.2020.00075 · Cited by 2
Pachón, V., Vázquez, J. M., Betanzos, J. M. L., & Fernández, J. L. A. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.259 · Cited by 2
SqueezeBioBERT: BioBERT Distillation for Healthcare Natural Language Processing
Du, H. G., & Hu, Y. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66046-8_16 · Cited by 2
Language modeling and bidirectional coders representations: an overview of key technologies
Kachkou, D. I. (2021) · Informatics · doi:10.37661/1816-0301-2020-17-4-61-72 · Cited by 2
Humor@IITK at SemEval-2021 Task 7: Large Language Models for Quantifying Humor and Offensiveness
Gupta, A., Pal, A., Khurana, B., Tyagi, L., & Modi, A. (2021) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.36 · Cited by 2
Automatic Multiple-Choice and Fill-in-the-Blank Question Generation from Arbitrary Text
Cruz, R. R. D. L., Khalil, A., & Khalifa, S. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73103-8_16 · Cited by 2
Natural Language Understanding (NLU) on the Edge
Crausaz, N., Casas, J., Daher, K., Khaled, O. A., & Mugellini, E. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74009-2_6 · Cited by 2
Kalyan, V., Witteveen, S., & Andrews, M. (2021) · Workshop on Graph Based Methods for Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.textgraphs-1.20 · Cited by 3
Semantic Similarity Matching Using Contextualized Representations
Farahnak, F., Mohammadi, E., Davari, M., & Kosseim, L. (2021) · doi:10.21428/594757db.ea4e52c7 · Cited by 2
Compositional matrix-space models of language: Definitions, properties, and learning methods
Asaadi, S., Giesbrecht, E., & Rudolph, S. (2021) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324921000206 · Cited by 2
Povšič, J. J., & Brodnik, A. (2021) · doi:10.18690/978-961-286-516-0.2 · Cited by 3
Network embeddings from distributional thesauri for improving static word representations
Jana, A., Haldar, S., & Goyal, P. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115868 · Cited by 3
Understanding and Evaluating Commonsense Reasoning in Transformer-based Architectures
Gakhar, M., Chahal, N., & Aggarwal, A. (2021) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt51525.2021.9579601 · Cited by 2
Mental health analysis during COVID-19: A comparison before and during the pandemic
Bajaj, G. S., Yadav, H., Sahdev, H. S., Sah, S., & Kaur, P. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (IC2PCT) · doi:10.1109/gucon50781.2021.9573763 · Cited by 2
Not So Fast, Classifier – Accuracy and Entropy Reduction in Incremental Intent Classification
Hrycyk, L., Zarcone, A., & Hahn, L. (2021) · Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI (NLP4ConvAI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nlp4convai-1.6 · Cited by 2
Cryptocurrency Day Trading and Framing Prediction in Microblog Discourse
Maule, A. P. P., & Johnson, K. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.econlp-1.11 · Cited by 2
Relationship Between Personality Patterns and Harmfulness
Matsumoto, K., Kishima, R., Tsuchiya, S., Hirobayashi, T., Yoshida, M., & Kita, K. (2022) · International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering · doi:10.4018/ijitwe.298654 · Cited by 3
A manifesto for computational sociology: The Canadian perspective
Fu, Q., Gu, J., Zeng, Z., & Tindall, D. B. (2022) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/cars.12379 · Cited by 3
Perceiving the level of depression from web text
Bisht, S. S., Shandilya, H., Gupta, V., Agrawal, S., & Jain, S. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91196-2.00008-9 · Cited by 2
Stemming the Tide of Fake News about the COVID-19 Pandemic
Li, C.-Y., Chun, S. A., & Geller, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference · doi:10.32473/flairs.v35i.130716 · Cited by 3
A study on stock price crack prediction using qualitative information
Jeong, J., & Kim, C. (2022) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2022.23.4.707 · Cited by 2
Thai Tokenizer Invariant Classification Based on Bi-LSTM and DistilBERT Encoders
Kongsumran, N., Phimoltares, S., & Panthuwadeethorn, S. (2022) · International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON) · doi:10.1109/ecti-con54298.2022.9795573 · Cited by 2
Learning user preferences through online conversations via personalized memory transfer
Godavarthy, N., Wang, Y., Ebesu, T., Suthee, U., Xie, M., & Fang, Y. (2022) · Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s10791-022-09410-1 · Cited by 3
Domain-specific knowledge distillation yields smaller and better models for conversational commerce
Howell, K., Wang, J., Hazare, A., Bradley, J., Brew, C., Chen, X., Dunn, M., Hockey, B. A., Maurer, A., & Widdows, D. (2022) · Workshop on e-Commerce and NLP (ECNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.ecnlp-1.18 · Cited by 3
Pre-trained language models evaluating themselves - A comparative study
Koch, P., Aßenmacher, M., & Heumann, C. (2022) · Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP (Insights) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.insights-1.25 · Cited by 2
Rouhizadeh, H., & Teodoro, D. (2022) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.semeval-1.212 · Cited by 3
Lightweight Transformers for Conversational AI
Pressel, D., Liu, W., Johnston, M. O., & Chen, M. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-industry.25 · Cited by 2
Improving Code-Switching Dependency Parsing with Semi-Supervised Auxiliary Tasks
Özateş, Ş. B., Özgür, A., Güngör, T., & Çetinoğlu, Ö. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.87 · Cited by 1
Zosa, E., Boroş, E., Koloski, B., & Pivovarova, L. (2022) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.semeval-1.156 · Cited by 2
TLDR at SemEval-2022 Task 1: Using Transformers to Learn Dictionaries and Representations
Srivastava, A., & Vemulapati, H. V. (2022) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.semeval-1.6 · Cited by 2
Answering Binary Causal Questions Using Role-Oriented Concept Embedding
Kayesh, H., Islam, M. S., & Wang, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2022.3204245 · Cited by 2
Hate Speech detection in English and Malayalam Code-Mixed Text using BERT embedding
Varma, P. D., Vinod, P., Nandakumar, M., et al. (2022) · International Conference on Computing, Communication, Security and Intelligent Systems (IC3SIS) · doi:10.1109/ic3sis54991.2022.9885339 · Cited by 2
MESDeceiver: Efficiently Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examples
Zhao, T., Ge, Z., Hu, H., & Shi, D. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892490 · Cited by 2
Gradual Further Pre-training Architecture for Economics/Finance Domain Adaptation of Language Model
Sakaji, H., Suzuki, M., Izumi, K., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020445 · Cited by 2
Identifying Discourse Elements in Writing by Longformer for NER Token Classification
Alkabool, A., Abdullah, S. A., Zadeh, S., & Mahfooz, H. (2023) · Iraqi Journal for Electrical And Electronic Engineering · doi:10.37917/ijeee.19.1.11 · Cited by 3
Using BERT to extract emotions from personal journals
Ovidiu-Mihai, V., Ileni, T. A., & Petrescu, M. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP) · doi:10.1109/iccp56966.2022.10053943 · Cited by 2
On the Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent in Low-Precision Number Formats
Cacciola, M., Frangioni, A., Asgharian, M., Ghaffari, A., & Nia, V. P. (2023) · International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods · doi:10.5220/0011795500003411 · Cited by 4
Neural Coreference Resolution for Turkish
Demir, Ş. (2023) · Journal of Intelligent Systems Theory and Applications · doi:10.38016/jista.1225097 · Cited by 2
Sentence Similarity Recognition in Portuguese from Multiple Embedding Models
Rodrigues, A. C. N., & Marcacini, R. M. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla55696.2022.00029 · Cited by 2
Falaki, A. A., & Gras, R. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla55696.2022.00030 · Cited by 2
Scalable Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learning
Rubashevskii, A., Kotova, D., & Panov, M. (2023) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611977653.ch83 · Cited by 3
Explicit and Implicit Semantic Ranking Framework
Zhu, X., Lin, T., Anand, V., Calderwood, M. D., Clausen-Brown, E., Lueck, G., Yim, W.-W., & Wu, C. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543873.3584621 · Cited by 2
Automating Arduino Programming: From Hardware Setups to Sample Source Code Generation
Yusuf, I. N. B., Jamal, D. B. A., & Jiang, L. (2023) · International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr59073.2023.00069 · Cited by 5
Kumar, J., Gupta, A., Lu, Z., Stefan, A., & King, T. H. (2023) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3539618.3591826 · Cited by 4
KATIE: A System for Key Attributes Identification in Product Knowledge Graph Construction
Er-Rahmadi, B., Oncevay, A., Ji, Y., & Pan, J. Z. (2023) · Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3539618.3591846 · Cited by 1
Segura-Bédmar, I. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.25 · Cited by 2
Measuring Consistency in Text-based Financial Forecasting Models
Yang, L., Ma, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.769 · Cited by 5
Segura-Bédmar, I. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.26 · Cited by 2
Störmer, P., Esser, T., & Thomasius, P. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.169 · Cited by 2
Plug-and-Play Recipe Generation with Content Planning
Liu, Y., Su, Y., Shareghi, E., & Collier, N. (2022) · Workshop on Generation, Evaluation and Metrics (GEM) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.gem-1.19 · Cited by 4
Gubelmann, R., Hongler, P., Margadant, E., & Handschuh, S. (2022) · Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop (NLLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.nllp-1.2 · Cited by 2
BARLE: Background-Aware Representation Learning for Background Shift Out-of-Distribution Detection
Duan, H., Yang, Y., Abbasi, A., & Tam, K. Y. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.53 · Cited by 2
Contextualizing Language Models for Norms Diverging from Social Majority
Kiehne, N., Kroll, H., & Balke, W. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.339 · Cited by 2
A Zoom into Ecuadorian Politics: Manifesto Text Classification using NLP
Barzallo, F., Moscoso, M. E., Pérez, M., Baldeon-Calisto, M., Navarrete, D., Riofrío, D., Medina, P., & Lai-Yuen, S. K. (2023) · International Conference on Pattern Recognition Systems (ICPRS) · doi:10.1109/icprs58416.2023.10213340 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
