The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,201–3,300 of 4,692
Pros and Cons of Weight Pruning for Out-of-Distribution Detection: An Empirical Survey
Koda, S., Zolfi, A., Grolman, E., Shabtai, A., Morikawa, I., & Elovici, Y. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191141 · Cited by 2
Ranger: A Toolkit for Effect-Size Based Multi-Task Evaluation
Sertkan, M., Althammer, S., & Hofstätter, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.56 · Cited by 5
InfoSync: Information Synchronization across Multilingual Semi-structured Tables
Khincha, S., Jain, C., Gupta, V., Kataria, T., & Zhang, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.159 · Cited by 2
Evaluating and Improving Automatic Speech Recognition using Severity
Whetten, R., & Kennington, C. (2023) · Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing (BioNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.bionlp-1.6 · Cited by 2
Zhou, Q., Yang, Z., Li, P., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.738 · Cited by 2
DMLM: Descriptive Masked Language Modeling
Barba, E., Campolungo, N., & Roberto Navigli, A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.808 · Cited by 3
Exploring the Relationship between Alignment and Cross-lingual Transfer in Multilingual Transformers
Gaschi, F., Cerda, P., Rastin, P., & Toussaint, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.189 · Cited by 16
Woźny, M., & Lango, M. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.202 · Cited by 2
Distilling Efficient Language-Specific Models for Cross-Lingual Transfer
Ansell, A., Ponti, E. M., Korhonen, A., & Vulić, I. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.517 · Cited by 2
Quantifying Train-Evaluation Overlap with Nearest Neighbors
Kambhatla, G., Thủy, N. T. T., & Choi, E. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.183 · Cited by 3
Qachfar, F. Z., & Verma, R. M. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.293 · Cited by 2
Campos, D., Marques, A., Kurtz, M., & Zhai, C. X. (2023) · Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.sustainlp-1.3 · Cited by 3
Zero-Shot Dynamic Quantization for Transformer Inference
El-Kurdi, Y., Quinn, J., & Sil, A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-industry.45 · Cited by 2
Comparative Analysis of Cross-lingual Contextualized Word Embeddings
Saadi, H. S., Hangya, V., Eder, T., & Fraser, A. (2022) · Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning (MRL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.mrl-1.6 · Cited by 2
Liu, H., Cai, Y., Ou, Z., et al. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.seretod-1.10 · Cited by 2
Exploration of Contrastive Learning Strategies toward more Robust Stance Detection
Rajendran, U. K., & Trabelsi, A. (2023) · Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment & Social Media Analysis (WASSA) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.wassa-1.37 · Cited by 2
Bhan, M., Vittaut, J.-N., Chesneau, N., & Lesot, M. (2023) · Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing (TrustNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.trustnlp-1.19 · Cited by 3
Annealing Genetic-based Preposition Substitution for Text Rubbish Example Generation
Li, C. C., Yang, X., Liu, B., Liu, W., & Chen, H. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/569 · Cited by 2
News Categorisation Based on Pre-Trained Transformer Models
Espín-Riofrio, C., Murillo-Cepeda, V., García-Zambrano, D., Morán, V. D. R. M., Montejo‐Ráez, A., & Gamboa, J. Z. (2023) · LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI) · doi:10.18687/laccei2023.1.1.1076 · Cited by 2
Pon Karthika, K., & Priya, S. K. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121189 · Cited by 2
Borst, J., Wencker, T., & Niekler, A. (2023) · Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature (LaTeCH-CLfL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.latechclfl-1.11 · Cited by 4
ERATE: Efficient Retrieval Augmented Text Embeddings
Raina, V., Kassner, N., Popat, K., Lewis, P., Cancedda, N., & Martin, L. (2023) · Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP (Insights) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.insights-1.2 · Cited by 2
Made of Steel? Learning Plausible Materials for Components in the Vehicle Repair Domain
Eichel, A., Schlipf, H., & Walde, S. S. I. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.104 · Cited by 3
Kim, M., Shim, K., Park, S., Sung, W., & Choi, J. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.64 · Cited by 2
Escol, J. B. B., Guibone, J. L., Duenas, W. K. E., Abalorio, C. C., Bustillo, J. C. M., & Bojocan, J. T. (2023) · International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering · doi:10.46338/ijetae0923_03 · Cited by 2
Chen, T., Liu, S., Chen, Z., Hu, W., Chen, D., Wang, Y., Lyu, Q., Le, C. X., & Wang, W. (2023) · Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning · doi:10.54364/aaiml.2023.1181 · Cited by 2
Cluster Fusion Training: Exploring Cluster Analysis to Enhance Cross-Domain Sentiment Classification
Tomita, V. A. K., da Silva, A. C. M., & Marcacini, R. M. (2023) · doi:10.5753/eniac.2023.234035 · Cited by 2
Marrugo, D. A., Martínez-Santos, J. C., & Puertas, E. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46739-4_11 · Cited by 2
Dusart, A., Pinel-Sauvagnat, K., & Hubert, G. (2023) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100272 · Cited by 2
Finetuning Deep Learning Model for Review Rating Prediction
Bentaleb, A., & Abouchabaka, J. (2023) · International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems · doi:10.12785/ijcds/140182 · Cited by 2
Deng, Q., Yang, Y., Zhang, X., Qian, S., Zhang, M., & Cai, K. (2023) · IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) · doi:10.1109/dasc58513.2023.10311266 · Cited by 2
Verma, A., Goyal, N., Bansal, P., & Gambhir, P. (2023) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt56998.2023.10307214 · Cited by 2
Knowledge Distillation ≈ Label Smoothing: Fact or Fallacy? Label Smoothing: Fact or Fallacy?
Sultan, M. A. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.271 · Cited by 3
Symbolization, Prompt, and Classification: A Framework for Implicit Speaker Identification in Novels
Chen, Y., He, T., Zhou, H., Gu, J.-C., Lu, H., & Ling, Z.-H. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.225 · Cited by 2
Counterfactual Augmentation for Multimodal Learning Under Presentation Bias
Lin, V., Morency, L., Dimitriadis, D., et al. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.43 · Cited by 2
Compressing and Debiasing Vision-Language Pre-Trained Models for Visual Question Answering
Si, Q., Liu, Y., Lin, Z., Fu, P., Cao, Y., & Wang, W. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.34 · Cited by 2
Contrastive Learning for Universal Zero-Shot NLI with Cross-Lingual Sentence Embeddings
Kowsher, M., Sobuj, M. S. I., Prottasha, N. J., Arefin, M. S., & Morimoto, Y. (2023) · Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning (MRL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.mrl-1.18 · Cited by 3
Enhancing Scalability of Pre-trained Language Models via Efficient Parameter Sharing
Liu, P., Gao, Z., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., & Wen, J.-R. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.920 · Cited by 2
Exploring Semantic vs. Syntactic Features for Unsupervised Learning on Application Log Files
Karlsen, E., Copstein, R., Luo, X., Schwartzentruber, J., Niblett, B., Johnston, A., Heywood, M. I., & Zincir-Heywood, N. (2023) · Cyber Security in Networking Conference (CSNet) · doi:10.1109/csnet59123.2023.10339765 · Cited by 4
Improving Scientific Literature Classification: A Parameter-Efficient Transformer-Based Approach
Ahanger, M. M., & Wani, M. A. (2023) · International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems · doi:10.32985/ijeces.14.10.4 · Cited by 2
Black-Box Attacks on Image Activity Prediction and its Natural Language Explanations
Baia, A. E., Poggioni, V., & Cavallaro, A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw60793.2023.00396 · Cited by 2
Performance Characterization of Popular DNN Models on Out-of-Order CPUs
Prieto, P., Abad, P., Gregorio, J. A., & Puente, V. (2023) · International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT) · doi:10.1109/pact58117.2023.00025 · Cited by 2
Adult Content Detection on Indonesian Tweets by Fine-tuning Transformer-based Models
Hidayatullah, A. F., Apong, R. A. A. H. M., Lai, D. T. C., & Qazi, A. (2023) · International Conference on Applied Computational Intelligence in Information Systems (ACIIS) · doi:10.1109/aciis59385.2023.10367283 · Cited by 3
Learning Affective Responses to Music from Social Media Discourse
Beery, A. J., & Donnelly, P. J. (2023) · Signals and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44260-5_6 · Cited by 2
Gökçimen, T., & Daş, B. (2023) · International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (IISEC) · doi:10.1109/iisec59749.2023.10391042 · Cited by 2
Tirsogoiu, D.-M., & Marginean, A. N. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP) · doi:10.1109/iccp60212.2023.10398658 · Cited by 3
An Energy-Based Comparative Analysis of Common Approaches to Text Classification in the Legal Domain
Gültekin, S., Globo, A., Zugarini, A., Ernandes, M., & Rigutini, L. (2024) · International Conference on AI, Machine Learning and Applications (AIMLA) · doi:10.5121/csit.2024.140203 · Cited by 4
Zhuang, Y., Liu, B., Lin, X., & Xu, C. (2023) · International Conference on Data Science and Information Technology (DSIT) · doi:10.1109/dsit60026.2023.00058 · Cited by 2
Sculpting DistilBERT: Enhancing Efficiency in Resource-Constrained Scenarios
Prema, V., & Elavazhahan, V. (2023) · International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) · doi:10.1109/smart59791.2023.10428568 · Cited by 2
Yoo, B., & Kim, K.-J. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100061 · Cited by 3
Triple-Compressed BERT for Efficient Implementation on NLP Tasks
Peng, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2023) · International Conference on Electronic Information Engineering and Computer Science (EIECS) · doi:10.1109/eiecs59936.2023.10435469 · Cited by 2
Exploratory analysis on the natural language processing models for task specific purposes
Shidaganti, G. I., Shetty, R., Edara, T., Srinivas, P., & Tammineni, S. C. (2024) · Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics · doi:10.11591/eei.v13i2.6360 · Cited by 3
Mollah, M. A., & Sami, S. K. (2023) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit60459.2023.10441032 · Cited by 2
Sentiment analysis and classification of Ghanaian football tweets from the 2022 FIFA World Cup
Eshun, M., Gyening, R.-M. O. M., Takyi, K., Appiahene, P., Kwame, P. O., & Amoako-Banning, L. (2024) · Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.11591/ijeecs.v34.i1.pp497-507 · Cited by 2
Liao, H., Liang, Y., Chen, S., Xiang, L., Chang, Z., & Yun, X. (2024) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2024.2321552 · Cited by 3
Jingga, K., & Hidayaturrahman, H. (2023) · doi:10.1109/iwaiip58158.2023.10462787 · Cited by 2
Towards Equipping Transformer with the Ability of Systematic Compositionality
Chen, H., Qin, P., Lei, W., & Lv, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29788 · Cited by 3
A General Search-Based Framework for Generating Textual Counterfactual Explanations
Gilo, D., & Markovitch, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29764 · Cited by 4
Using Artificial Populations to Study Psychological Phenomena in Neural Models
Roberts, J., Moore, K., Wilenzick, D., & Fisher, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29856 · Cited by 3
C-CLIP: Contrastive Image-Text Encoders to Close the Descriptive-Commentative Gap
Theisen, W., & Scheirer, W. J. (2024) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv57701.2024.00708 · Cited by 3
Quellcodekritik. Zur Philologie von Algorithmen
Bajohr, H., & Krajewski, M. (2024) · doi:10.52438/avaa1004 · Cited by 6
Deep Learning Approach to predict Emotional Effect in Conversations
Jagadeesan, K., Annapurani, K., & Pant, R. (2024) · International Conference on Networking and Communications (ICNWC) · doi:10.1109/icnwc60771.2024.10537491 · Cited by 2
Multilingual Taxonomic Web Page Categorization Through Ensemble Knowledge Distillation
Ye, E., Bai, X., O’Hare, N., Asgarieh, E., Thadani, K., Perez-Sorrosal, F., & Adiga, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3406368 · Cited by 3
Xenophobia Meter: Defining and Measuring Online Sentiment toward Foreigners on Twitter
Umarova, K., Okorafor, O., Lu, P., Shan, S., Xu, A., Zhou, R., Otiono, J., Lyon, B., & Leshed, G. (2024) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31406 · Cited by 2
With Flying Colors: Predicting Community Success in Large-Scale Collaborative Campaigns
Israeli, A., & Tsur, O. (2024) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31344 · Cited by 2
Mariotti, E., Arias-Duart, A., Cafagna, M., Albert Gatt, A., García-Gasulla, D., & Alonso, J. M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3408062 · Cited by 2
A Distributed Training Approach on Email Spam Classification using DistilBERT
Padilla, D. A., Fernandez, B. D. P., & Rosario, V. I. D. (2024) · International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT) · doi:10.1109/icict62343.2024.00028 · Cited by 2
Agrawal, K., Boggarapu, H. V., & Arya, A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) · doi:10.1109/i2ct61223.2024.10543658 · Cited by 2
Anand, H., & Arya, A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) · doi:10.1109/i2ct61223.2024.10543560 · Cited by 2
A Syntax-Injected Approach for Faster and More Accurate Sentiment Analysis
Imran, M., Kellert, O., & Gómez-Rodríguez, C. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3519 · Cited by 9
How to Classify Domain Entities Into Top-Level Ontology Concepts Using Large Language Models
Lopes, A., Carbonera, J. L., Rodrigues, F. H., Garcia, L. F., & Abel, M. (2024) · Applied Ontology · doi:10.3233/ao-240032 · Cited by 4
QSMT-net: A query-sensitive proposal and multi-temporal-span matching network for video grounding
Wu, Q., Guo, L., Zhang, R., et al. (2024) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105188 · Cited by 2
Civil or Uncivil: Seeing the Role of User Actors and Providing Comments on Social Media
Wang, J., Tamtama, G. I. W., & Latifah, R. (2024) · International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON) · doi:10.1109/ecti-con60892.2024.10594939 · Cited by 2
Capturing the Spectrum of Social Media Conflict: A Novel Multi-objective Classification Model
Warke, O., Jose, J. M., Breitsohl, J., & Wang, J. (2024) · ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR) · doi:10.1145/3664190.3672510 · Cited by 3
FBPT: A Fully Binary Point Transformer
Hou, Z., Shang, Y., & Yan, Y. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10611616 · Cited by 2
Study on the Qualitative Cohesion in Bitcoin Market Price Prediction
Cho, N., Byun, J. H., & Yu, G. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3441755 · Cited by 2
MTSA: Multi-Granularity Metamorphic Testing for Sentiment Analysis Systems
Huang, H., Pan, Y., Luo, L., & Wang, Y. (2024) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac61105.2024.00176 · Cited by 2
Yu, D., & Qiu, L. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2024.3418837 · Cited by 2
Demystify Adult Learning: A Social Network and Large Language Model Assisted Approach
Liu, F., Ding, B., Guan, C., Zhang, W., Niyato, D. T., & Tan, J. W. L. (2024) · IEEE Annual Congress on Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) · doi:10.1109/aiot63253.2024.00048 · Cited by 2
Domain adaptation-based method for improving generalization of hate speech detection models
Nourollahi, S. F., Baradaran, R., & Amirkhani, H. (2024) · Archives de l'Institut d'Hessarek. · doi:10.61186/jsdp.21.1.125 · Cited by 2
Discrimination Bias Detection Through Categorical Association in Pre-Trained Language Models
Dusi, M., Arici, N., Gerevini, A., Putelli, L., & Serina, I. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3482010 · Cited by 5
Ranjith, R., Jo, A. A., & Raj, E. D. (2024) · IEEE World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC) · doi:10.1109/aic61668.2024.10730892 · Cited by 2
Zain, R. M., Anggai, S., Tukiyat, T., Musyafa, A., & Waskita, A. A. (2024) · International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and its Applications · doi:10.1109/ic3ina64086.2024.10732578 · Cited by 3
From Claim to Evidence: Verifying Chinese Health Claims with Medical Literature
Zuo, C., Liu, Y., Wang, C., & Banerjee, R. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9440-9_14 · Cited by 2
Singh, P., & Jain, A. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3487802 · Cited by 2
Mamelona, L., Ma, T., Li, J. I. A., Bediako-Kyeremeh, B., & Osibo, B. K. (2024) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.2024iip0002 · Cited by 2
Investigating Idiomaticity in Word Representations
He, W. P., Vieira, T. K., García, M., Scarton, C., Idiart, M., & Villavicencio, A. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00546 · Cited by 4
LightFusionRec: Lightweight Transformers-Based Cross-Domain Recommendation Model
Kharidia, V., Paprunia, D., & Kanikar, P. (2024) · International Conference on Software, Systems and Information Technology (SSITCON) · doi:10.1109/ssitcon62437.2024.10796005 · Cited by 2
LEXIQL: Quantum Natural Language Processing on NISQ-era Machines
Silver, D., Ranjan, A., Achutha, R., Patel, T., & Tiwari, D. (2024) · International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC) · doi:10.1109/sc41406.2024.00073 · Cited by 4
Feature Name Decoration Enhanced Router Performance Prediction by a Large Language Model
Hattori, K., Korikawa, T., & Takasaki, C. (2024) · International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM) · doi:10.23919/cnsm62983.2024.10814638 · Cited by 2
Exploring State-of-the-Art LLMs from BERT to XLNet: A study over Question Answering
Parra-Navarro, L. M., Batista, E. C. S., & Pacheco, M. A. C. (2024) · IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI) · doi:10.1109/la-cci62337.2024.10814828 · Cited by 2
An intelligent marketing platform with influencer classification in social networking services
Yu, X., Kim, J., Ahn, Y., Gu, M., Jeong, J. P., Bak, J., & Jo, J. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.112972 · Cited by 5
Explaining Veracity Predictions with Evidence Summarization: A Multi-Task Model Approach
Çekinel, R. F., & Karagöz, P. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825442 · Cited by 8
Singh, D., & Terayama, A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825282 · Cited by 2
Urdu Toxic Comment Classification With PURUTT Corpus Development
Saeed, H. H., Khalil, T., & Kamiran, F. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3535862 · Cited by 4
Pre-Training a Graph Recurrent Network for Text Understanding
Wang, Y., Yang, L., Teng, Z., Zhou, M., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3538221 · Cited by 4
AToM: Adaptive Token Merging for Efficient Acceleration of Vision Transformer
Shin, J., Kang, M., Han, Y., Park, J., & Kim, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2025.3540638 · Cited by 4
A Comprehensive Study on Advancements in Text Mining and Natural Language Processing
Mahire, S., Saravanan, U. K. B., Murali, M., & Prabakaran, N. (2024) · International Conference on Emerging Research in Computational Science (ICERCS) · doi:10.1109/icercs63125.2024.10895330 · Cited by 2
Influence of climate change and accidents on perception differs among energy technologies
L’Her, G., Duncan, N. A., Jenkins‐Smith, H. C., & Deinert, M. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf079 · Cited by 2
Hattori, K., Korikawa, T., & Takasaki, C. (2024) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom52923.2024.10901251 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
