The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,501–3,600 of 4,692
The role of artificial intelligence tools in climate change scientific assessmentsPreprint
Khourdajie, A. A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4747126 · Cited by 2
Dynamics Computational Sentiment Analysis in Financial MarketsPreprint
Carter, J., Nasir, W., Lee, S., & Parker, E. (2024) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0928.v1 · Cited by 2
Performance Comparison of Large Language Models, GPT and Gemini on Turkish News Classification TaskPreprint
Güven, Z. A. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4351735/v1 · Cited by 2
Large Language Models Training, Challenges, Applications, and DevelopmentPreprint
Taghandiki, K., & Mohammadi, M. H. (2024) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.171742381.10443150/v1 · Cited by 3
Automatic grammatical tagger for a Spanish–Mixtec parallel corpus
Santiago-Benito, H., Esparza, D. M. C., Castro-Sánchez, N. A., Terven, J. R., Romero-González, J.-A., & Garcia-Ramírez, T. (2024) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2024.101985 · Cited by 2
Sun, Y., Keung, J., Yang, Z., Yu, H. K., Luo, W., & Liao, Y. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5044241 · Cited by 2
Parker, S. T. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.01.16.25320680 · Cited by 2
Klein, A. Z., Weissenbacher, D., O’Connor, K., Elyaderani, A., Amaro, I. F., Onishi, T., Golder, S., Spiegel, K., Scotch, M., & Gonzalez‐Hernandez, G. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.04.25.25326298 · Cited by 1
deepak (2025) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/9jnhm_v1 · Cited by 2
EconBERT: A Large Language Model for EconomicsPreprint
Zhang, P., Rojcek, J., & Leippold, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5263616 · Cited by 2
A Catalog of Transformer Models
D’Souza, J. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r609337 · Cited by 3
A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework for LLM-Based Agent Memory
Wei, Q., Yang, T., Wang, Y., Li, X., Li, L., Yin, Z., Zhan, Y., Holz, T., Lin, Z., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02373 · Cited by 1
“The Distil Classifier is a binary sequence classification model built upon the DistilBERT-base-uncased architecture (Sanh et al., 2019), fine-tuned to distinguish between ’safe’ and ’harmful’ memory entries based on their textual content.”
ConGen: Unsupervised control and generalization distillation for sentence representation
Limkonchotiwat, P., Ponwitayarat, W., Lowphansirikul, L., Udomcharoenchaikit, C., Chuangsuwanich, E., & Nutanong, S. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.483 · Cited by 3
Vyākarana: A Colorless Green Benchmark for Syntactic Evaluation in Indic Languages
Patil, R., Dhillon, J., Mahurkar, S., Kulkarni, S., Malhotra, M., & Baths, V. (2021) · Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning (MRL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.mrl-1.14 · Cited by 1
Recovering Lexically and Semantically Reused Texts
MacLaughlin, A., Xu, S., & Smith, D. A. (2021) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.starsem-1.5 · Cited by 2
Taking Back Control of Social Media Feeds with Take Back Control
Salminen, J. O., Corporan, J., Jung, S., & Jansen, B. J. J. (2021) · International Conference on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) · doi:10.1109/inista52262.2021.9548614 · Cited by 1
Automatic Taxonomy Classification by Pretrained Language Model
Kuwana, A., Oba, A., Sawai, R., & Paik, I. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10212656 · Cited by 1
Cortis, K., Verma, K., & Davis, B. (2021) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_036 · Cited by 1
An adaptive knowledge distillation algorithm for text classification
Chen, Z., Hu, T., Chen, C., Ge, J., Wu, C., & Cheng, W. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Emergency Science and Information Technology (ICESIT) · doi:10.1109/icesit53460.2021.9696948 · Cited by 1
Voice Prescription using Natural Language Understanding
Shaikh, D. A., Fatehi, B., Khan, A., Shaikh, A., & Mapari, N. (2022) · International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT) · doi:10.1109/icaect54875.2022.9807998 · Cited by 1
Sketching a Linguistically-Driven Reasoning Dialog Model for Social Talk
Lưu, A. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop (ACL SRW) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-srw.14 · Cited by 1
Feature Representation Techniques for Hate Speech Detection on Social Media: A Comparative Study
Gongane, V. U., Munot, M. V., & Anuse, A. D. (2022) · International Conference on Signal and Information Processing · doi:10.1109/iconsip49665.2022.10007458 · Cited by 2
Class-wise and reduced calibration methods
Panchenko, M., Benmerzoug, A., & Delgado, M. D. B. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) · doi:10.1109/icmla55696.2022.00180 · Cited by 1
Dore, G. M. D. (2023) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-023-03147-0 · Cited by 1
Customized Transformer for Confident Browse Node Classification on Imbalanced Product Data
Selvakumaran, K., Sami, A., & Begum, B. (2023) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Sustainable Engineering Solutions (CISES) · doi:10.1109/cises58720.2023.10183484 · Cited by 1
Linguistic Feature Injection for Efficient Natural Language Processing
Fioravanti, S., Zugarini, A., Giannini, F., Rigutini, L., Maggini, M., & Diligenti, M. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191680 · Cited by 1
A Stacking-based Efficient Method for Toxic Language Detection on Live Streaming Chat
Oikawa, Y., Nakayama, Y., & Murakami, K. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-industry.58 · Cited by 1
Empowering MBTI Personality Classification through Transformer-Based Summarization Model
Elmoushy, S., Saeed, M. M., & Gomaa, W. H. (2023) · Intelligent Methods, Systems, and Applications (IMSA) · doi:10.1109/imsa58542.2023.10217442 · Cited by 1
Improving Long-Text Authorship Verification via Model Selection and Data Tuning
Nguyen, T., Dagli, C. K., Alperin, K., VanDam, C., & Singer, E. (2023) · Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature (LaTeCH-CLfL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.latechclfl-1.4 · Cited by 1
OphNER: Named Entity Recognition for Ophthalmology Newspapers
Le, B., Pham, T. Q., Hoang, A. T. V., & Nguyen, B. T. (2023) · International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/kse59128.2023.10299424 · Cited by 1
Guidance in Radiology Report Summarization: An Empirical Evaluation and Error Analysis
Trienes, J., Youssef, P., Schlötterer, J., & Seifert, C. (2023) · International Conference on Natural Language Generation · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.inlg-main.13 · Cited by 3
Co-training and Co-distillation for Quality Improvement and Compression of Language Models
Lee, H., Hou, R., Kim, J., Liang, D., Zhang, H., Hwang, S., & Min, A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.500 · Cited by 2
Zhou, Y. X., Camacho-Collados, J., & Bollegala, D. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.683 · Cited by 5
Breaking through Deterministic Barriers: Randomized Pruning Mask Generation and Selection
Li, J., Gao, W., Lei, Q., & Xu, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.763 · Cited by 4
Automatic Annotation of PubMed Articles with MeSH Qualifiers*
Tang, W., Klang, M., Medved, D., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340998 · Cited by 1
Mutasodirin, M. A., Prasojo, R. E., Abka, A. F., & Rasyidi, H. (2023) · International Conference on Advanced Informatics: Concepts, Theory and Applications (ICAICTA) · doi:10.1109/icaicta59291.2023.10390269 · Cited by 1
Adversarial Training with Comprehensive Objective for Medical Image Report Generation
Zhang, X., & Liu, J. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm58861.2023.10385588 · Cited by 1
Contrastive Learning Based Unsupervised Sentence Embeddings for Hinglish
Chaudhari, A. K., & Kushare, P. (2023) · International Conference on Computing Communication Control and automation · doi:10.1109/iccubea58933.2023.10392056 · Cited by 1
Late Fusion-based Distributed Multimodal Learning
Giobergia, F., & Baralis, E. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386612 · Cited by 1
Classifying Turkey Earthquake Tweets to Classify Them Based On Their Sentiment
Verma, A., Bansal, S., Gera, P., & Mohapatra, A. K. (2023) · International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) · doi:10.1109/ic3i59117.2023.10397724 · Cited by 2
Ebert, L., Huettemann, S., & Mueller, R. M. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.076 · Cited by 2
Knowledge Distillation Scheme for Named Entity Recognition Model Based on BERT
Ye, C., & Hernandez, A. A. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data and Business Intelligence (MLBDBI) · doi:10.1109/mlbdbi60823.2023.10482264 · Cited by 2
Efficient Authorship Attribution Method Using Ensemble Models Built by Knowledge Distillation
Sakurai, W., Asano, M., Imoto, D., Honma, M., & Kurosawa, K. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/iccc59590.2023.10507584 · Cited by 1
Firdaus, F., Rajagede, R. A., Sari, A., Hanifah, S., & Perwitasari, D. A. (2024) · International Journal of Engineering · doi:10.5829/ije.2024.37.09c.04 · Cited by 3
Comparison of Pretrained Models for Optimized Transformer Based Question Answering System
Gökçimen, T., & Daş, B. (2024) · International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS) · doi:10.1109/isdfs60797.2024.10527306 · Cited by 1
Vega, I., Valencia, J., Arcos, Á., Navarrete, D., & Baldeon-Calisto, M. (2024) · International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS) · doi:10.1109/isdfs60797.2024.10527264 · Cited by 1
Gazing After Glancing: Edge Information Guided Perception Network for Video Moment Retrieval
Huang, Z., Ji, Y., Li, Y., & Liu, C. (2024) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2024.3403533 · Cited by 1
Üretken uzamsal zekânın getirdiği paradigma değişimi
Güney, C. (2024) · Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation · doi:10.9733/jgg.2024r0009.t · Cited by 1
Zhao, S., Wang, Z., Yang, D., Li, X., Guo, B., & Yu, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31426 · Cited by 1
PromptLandscape: Guiding Prompts Exploration and Analysis with Visualization
Wang, J., Yeh, C. M., Fan, Y., Dai, X., Zheng, Y., Wang, L., & Zhang, W. (2024) · IEEE Pacific Visualization Conference (PacificVis) · doi:10.1109/pacificvis60374.2024.00045 · Cited by 1
Hate Speech on Social Platforms through the Application of ML and NLP Methods
Paunkoska, S., & Mirceva, G. (2024) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · doi:10.1109/mipro60963.2024.10569905 · Cited by 1
Barzallo, F., Baldeon-Calisto, M., Pérez, M., Moscoso, M. E., Navarrete, D., Riofrío, D., Medina, P., Lai-Yuen, S. K., Benítez, D. S., Pérez, N., et al. (2024) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393241266220 · Cited by 1
Weighted Subgraph Knowledge Distillation for Graph Model Compression
Liu, Y., & Shi, Z. (2024) · doi:10.1109/ieai62569.2024.00011 · Cited by 1
Effective Compression of Language Models by Combining Pruning and Knowledge Distillation
Chiu, C.-Y., Hong, D., Liu, P., & Wu, J. (2024) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac61105.2024.00066 · Cited by 1
Constructing ensembles for hate speech detection
Kucukkaya, I. E., & Toraman, Ç. (2024) · Natural language processing. · doi:10.1017/nlp.2024.44 · Cited by 3
TAWC: Text Augmentation with Word Contributions for Imbalance Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification
Santoso, N., Mendonça, I., & Aritsugi, M. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14198738 · Cited by 2
Closed-domain event extraction for hard news event monitoring: a systematic study
Dukić, D., Došilović, F. K., Pluščec, D., & Šnajder, J. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2355 · Cited by 1
Proskura, P., & Zaytsev, A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa61799.2024.10722805 · Cited by 1
ERDL: Efficient Retrieval Framework Based on Distillation from Large Language Models
Yu, H., Li, R., Zhang, Z., Ye, S., Liu, Q., Huang, Z., & Chen, E. (2024) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing (CLNLP) · doi:10.1109/clnlp64123.2024.00023 · Cited by 1
Symptom Based Medical Department Determination Using BERT
Chaurasia, M., Kumari, S., Chandel, S. S., Kumar, A., & Kumar, D. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Machine Intelligence (CVMI) · doi:10.1109/cvmi61877.2024.10782495 · Cited by 1
Court Case Dataset for Japanese Online Offensive Language Detection
Hisada, S., Wakamiya, S., & Aramaki, E. (2024) · Journal of Natural Language Processing · doi:10.5715/jnlp.31.1598 · Cited by 2
de Lima, V. M. A., & Marcacini, R. M. (2024) · Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality (SBQS) · doi:10.1145/3701625.3701700 · Cited by 3
Onobhayedo, P. A., Igah, C. O., & Okonkwo, A. (2024) · Journal on artificial intelligence · doi:10.32604/jai.2024.058649 · Cited by 2
Pham, H.-L., Mibayashi, R., Yamamoto, T., Kato, M. P., Yamamoto, Y., Shoji, Y., & Ohshima, H. (2025) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.2024dat0003 · Cited by 1
Buosi, S., Timilsina, M., Harris, L., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822369 · Cited by 1
HAYT application: the use of NLP to improve the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression
Amaro, I., Greca, A. D., & Tortora, G. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822039 · Cited by 2
Large Language Models to Enhance Malware Detection in Edge Computing
Rondanini, C., Carminati, B., Ferrari, E., Kundu, A., & Jajoo, A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA) · doi:10.1109/tps-isa62245.2024.00011 · Cited by 2
Preserving Privacy During Reinforcement Learning With AI Feedback
Gao, D., Miller, I. J., Allami, A. A., & Lin, D. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA) · doi:10.1109/tps-isa62245.2024.00033 · Cited by 2
Personality Prediction using Multiple Textual Datasets and Deep Learning Models
Arshad, F., Shaukat, A., & Latif, S. (2024) · International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT) · doi:10.1109/fit63703.2024.10838446 · Cited by 1
Toward Automatic Dataset Discovery From Scientific Publications
Kumar, S., Ghosal, T., & Ekbal, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3532767 · Cited by 1
Schler, J., Zubtsovsky, S., & Tuval‐Mashiach, R. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126559 · Cited by 1
Saliency-Based Token Swap - A Language-Agnostic Data Augmentation Method for Text Classification
Ilangeshwaran, H., Abeywardhana, L., & Rathnayake, S. (2024) · International Conference on Information Technology Research (ICITR) · doi:10.1109/icitr64794.2024.10857798 · Cited by 1
Beyond Scales and Essays: Artificial Intelligence Chatbots as Personality Interviewers
Sylvara, A. L., Gregg, E. E., & Sun, T. (2026) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2026.2664795 · Cited by 1
Using BERT to Generate Contextualised Textual Images for Sentiment Analysis
Singh, H., Na Helian, B., Adams, R. G., & Sun, Y. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84353-2_20 · Cited by 1
Stance classification: a comparative study and use case on Australian parliamentary debates
Ng, S., Zhang, J., Yu, S. S., Bhatti, A., Backholer, K., & Lim, C. P. (2025) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-025-00366-y · Cited by 3
Enhancing SimpLex, a Lexical Simplification Architecture
Camara, M., Ellouze, S., Jaoua, M., & Gargouri, B. (2024) · IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) · doi:10.1109/aiccsa63423.2024.10912569 · Cited by 1
BCS-Net: Multi-Task Breast Cancer Screening Network Enhanced by Multi-Modality Attention
Li, R., Li, R., Takaya, E., Lin, Z., Kobayashi, T., Mtsuda, N., & Ueda, T. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888652 · Cited by 1
Arch-Net: Model conversion and quantization for architecture agnostic model deployment
Fang, S., Xu, W., Feng, Z., Yuan, S. M., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Ding, W., & Zhou, S. (2025) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107384 · Cited by 1
PaSSw0rdVib3s!: AI-assisted password recognition for digital forensic investigations
van Dijk, R., van de Wetering, J., Argentini, R., Gorka, L., van Luenen, A. F., Minnema, S., Rijgersberg, E., Ugen, M., Mann, Z. Á., & Geradts, Z. (2025) · Forensic Science International Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301870 · Cited by 2
Question answering over temporal knowledge graphs based on hierarchical semantic extraction
Wang, J., Zhang, W., He, Q., & Zhao, D. (2024) · IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC) · doi:10.1109/swc62898.2024.00207 · Cited by 1
Text Summarization with DistilBERT-LSTM
Pattanayak, B., Majumder, A., Jothi, B., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/iciscn64258.2025.10934207 · Cited by 1
Automated Software Requirements Prioritization Using Natural Language Processing
Ahmad, I., Rasheed, U., Khalil, I., Anwaar, Z., & Butt, W. H. (2025) · International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS) · doi:10.1109/icacs64902.2025.10937796 · Cited by 1
Multimodal Learning for Just-In-Time Software Defect Prediction in Autonomous Driving Systems
Mohammad, F., & Ryu, D. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) · doi:10.1109/bigcomp64353.2025.00024 · Cited by 1
F3: An FPGA-Based Transformer Fine-Tuning Accelerator With Flexible Floating Point Format
He, Z., Jin, X., & Xu, Z. (2025) · IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/jetcas.2025.3555970 · Cited by 3
Re-Evaluating Group Robustness via Adaptive Class-Specific Scaling
Seo, S., & Han, B. (2025) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00812 · Cited by 1
Anggrainingsih, R., Wardani, D. W., Cahyono, H. D., Hendrasuryawan, B., Widoyono, B., & Setiadi, H. (2024) · International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI) · doi:10.1109/isriti64779.2024.10963454 · Cited by 1
Fine-Tuning Transformers for News Topic Classification: Method and Best Practice
Masaling, N. A. P., & Suhartono, D. (2024) · International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI) · doi:10.1109/isriti64779.2024.10963556 · Cited by 1
Bueno, R. O., Fersini, E., & Rosso, P. (2025) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.70062 · Cited by 1
Crisis impact extraction language model using transformer-based synergy via transfer learning
Woo, S. H., Woo, S., & Son, Y. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127956 · Cited by 1
Pramanik, S., Gupta, S. R., & Das, N. (2025) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-025-00947-3 · Cited by 1
Navarra, C., Kucher, K., Neset, T., Villaro, C. G., Schück, F., Unger, J., & Vrotsou, K. (2025) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105562 · Cited by 1
A Review of Transformer-Based Models for Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Jayasudha, J. (2025) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2025.71832 · Cited by 2
Bridging Social Media and Search Engines: Dredge Words and the Detection of Unreliable Domains
Williams, E., Carragher, P., & Carley, K. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35917 · Cited by 1
Relevancy classification in Bangla social media comments using Transformer architecture
Raha, F. R., Alve, S. R., & Rahman, M. S. (2024) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit64611.2024.11022585 · Cited by 1
Alam, M. A., Hossain, J., Ahsan, S., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit64611.2024.11022375 · Cited by 1
A Crop Recommendation System Using Transformer-Based NLP Models
Thankachan, J. A., Yuvasree, R., Varsa, S., Yureka, R., & Amreetha, R. (2025) · doi:10.1109/iccct63501.2025.11019021 · Cited by 2
Dynamic Mixture of Experts for Adaptive Computation in Character-Level Transformers
Huang, Z., Chen, M., & Zheng, S. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16060483 · Cited by 3
Intelligent Semantic Matching (ISM) for Video Tutorial Search using Transformer Models
Tayeb, A. J., & Haiduc, S. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr66628.2025.00108 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
